GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE
GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE is a certified child care center in Pennsburg, PA, with capacity for 142 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 12 times. The state cited 61 violations, 8 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for training & qualifications (19 of 61). 10 citations came in the last 12 months. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #277 of 403 centers in Montgomery County and has more citations per inspection than 53% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
At the time of the inspection the children were playing on the playground adjacent to the parking lot and the woods, the gate of the playground was broken and not locking at all.
At the time of the inspection there was continued noncompliance observed, the records of all three of staff providing care were indicating that they were aide level staff, due to the lack of previous childcare experience
At the time of the inspection there was not staff person who was responsible for compliance with this chapter in the Director's absence.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 (serving the facility since October 2024) had an emergency plan training that was completed over one year ago
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #3 had a current valid health assesment without the proof of the TB screening.
At the time of the inspection the health assessment of staff person #5 did not contain the the physician's or CRNP's assessment of the person's suitability to provide child care.
At the time of the inspection the following staff were observed caring for children did not have the two recommendation letters required for childcare staff in their staff record. #3, and #4
Due to a lack of verified child care experience or certification of educational level 6 of the 9 staff records reviewed were determined to be aide level staff.
At the time of the inspection the records of staff person #1 and staff person #2 did not have all12 hours of child care training documented for their current annual cycle.
At the time of the inspection certification representative did request access to the staff and child files, staff at the facility was unable to provide immediate access.
At the time of the inspection the 'parent board' did not contain the facility's current certificate of compliance.
Show 55 older citations
At the time of the inspection the facility did not have the proof of the annual inspection, by a fire safety professional, of the fire detection system (to verify the operability of the system).
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 did not contain complete proof of all required professional development listed in subsections (f)1-10.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #2 (having served the facility over 90 days) was lacking the proof of the completion of professional development in pediatric first aid and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the record of staff person #3 was lacking the required pre-service, health and safety training
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 was lacking the following CPSL required documents: Mandated Reporter training.
At the time of the inspection the records of staff person #4, staff person #2 and staff person #3 were lacking the verification of child care experience to qualify them for the position they are performing at the facility. The record of staff person #4 was lacking verification of educational level.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #5 (having served the facility for multiple years) was lacking the current proof of annual minimum of 12 clock hours of child care training.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 was lacking the following CPSL required documents: FBI clearance, National Sex Offender Registry clearance, Mandated Reporter training.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 was lacking documentation of the training regarding the emergency plan at the time of initial employment, on an annual basis and at the time of each plan update.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 did not contain complete proof of all required professional development listed in subsections (f)1-10.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 was lacking verification of educational level or any previous childcare experience.
At the time of the inspection the facility did not have the current certificate of compliance posted in a conspicuous location used by parents.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 was lacking state police clearance, child abuse clearance and FBI clearance. The record of staff person #2 was lacking state police clearance.
At the time of the inspection the records of staff person #1 and staff person #2 were lacking proof of training regarding the emergency plan of the facility
At the time of the inspection the children were being cared for in the lobby of the facility, a public space.
Continued noncompliance from the August and October renewal inspections: At the time of the inspection one of the first aid kit in the large muscle play space was stored on a table and easily accessible to the children in care.
At the time of the inspection the records of staff person #1 and staff person #2 did not include current valid health assessments.
Continued non compliance from pervious verification of corrections visit on October 3rd. On the date of the most recent inspection summary issued by the Department was not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #2 did not include proof of education level, previous child care experience or letters of reference.
Continued noncompliance from the August renewal: at the time of the inspection the emergency contact information for the children in care was not present in the large muscle play space where the children were receiving care.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 did not contain verification of educational level or previous childcare experience, nor did it contain the required reference letters.
Continued non compliance from pervious verification of corrections visit on October 3rd. At the time of the inspection the facility did not have a current certificate of compliance posted in a conspicuous location used by parents.
At the time of the inspection the staff person #1 was asked if they could identify their 'primary care group' and they responded: "we are responsible for all of them"
Continued noncompliance from the August renewal inspection: At the time of the inspection one of the first aid kit in the large muscle play space was stored on a table and easily accessible to the children in care.
At the time of the inspection the staff at the facility were unable to provide this writer immediate access to the files and records.
On the date of the most recent inspection summary issued by the Department was not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents.
Continued noncompliance from the August renewal: at the time of the inspection the emergency contact information for the children in care was not present in the large muscle play space where the children were receiving care.
At the time of the inspection the facility did not have a current certificate of compliance posted in a conspicuous location used by parents.
At the time of the inspection the following CPSL violations were observed: The record of staff person #1 was lacking a current valid FBI clearance, the record of staff person #4 was lacking a current state police clearance, the record of staff person #5 was lacking a current valid state police clearance, the record of staff person #6 was lacking a current valid state national sex offender clearance letter, the record of staff person #6 was lacking a current valid state national sex offender clearance letter.
At the time of the inspection the emergency plan of the facility did not include written documentation of a review and update of the emergency plan within the last year.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person # 1 did not contain proof of the current emergency plan training.
At the time of the inspection one of the first aid kit in the large muscle play space was stored along side the children's lunch boxes.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #2 was lacking a current valid health assessment.
At the time of the inspection the fire drill log at the facility did not indicate specific time of day of the drill, the hypothetical location of the fire, the evacuation time, and the names of the facility persons and the number of children who participate in the fire drill.
At the time of the inspection the facility did not have proof of the general liability insurance to cover the persons who are on the premises.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 (having served the facility over one year) did rnot contain proof of the current fire safety training.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #2 did not contain proof of the required water safety training.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #2 did not include the verification of child care experience, education and training prior to service at the facility that would serve as qualifications for the position in which the person is performing.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 (having served the facility over one year) did not have a current performance evaluation.
At the time of the inspection the emergency contact information for the children in care was not present in the large muscle play space where the children were receiving care.
At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 (having served the facility over 45 days) was lacking in the NSOR clearance information.
At the time of the inspection staff interviewed did not have an awareness of the required 'primary care group'
At the time of the inspection the first aid kits in the gym were on the floor and accessible to the children. In addition the kits did not contain tweezers.
At the time of the inspection the facility did not have the current inspection report Certifiying the operability of the fire detection system.
At the time of the inspection staff person #2, having served the facility over 90 day, was observed supervising an aide level staff person and a child.
At the time of the inspection the emergency contact information of the children in care in the gym was not in the gym with them.
On 8/26/22, Staff #3 file did not contain NSOR clearance required by CPSL. No evidence of NSOR request was observed on file.
On 8/26/22, Staff #2 and Staff #5 were observed out of ratio with 24 children in the 2nd floor child care space. The youngest children were PK (have not started Kindergarten).
On 8/26/22, Staff #2 file did not contain evidence of annual training in the facility's emergency plan. The last training was dated 5/23/21.
On 8/26/22, medication was observed accessible to children in the facility's emergency backpack. The backpack was observed unzipped and on the grass located in the outdoor play space where children were playing.
On 8/26/22, Staff #3 file did not contain an initial health assessment. (Results of TB test only were observed in the file)
On 8/26/22, the facility's fire detection inspection report dated 7/27/22 contained deficiencies. No evidence that the fire detection system deficiencies have been corrected was on file at the facility.
On 8/26/22, Staff #1 and Staff #2 file did not contain proof of annual fire safety training.
On 8/26/22, Staff #3 file did not contain verification of education.
On 8/26/22, Child #1 file did not contain a signed agreement.
On 8/26/22, an individual record was not on file for Staff #4.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Enforcement actions
Negative sanctions Pennsylvania lists for this center, such as a downgrade to a provisional certificate, refusing to renew or revoking its certificate of compliance, with the status COMPASS shows. “Operation permitted” means the center may keep operating while it appeals; “operation not permitted” means it may not.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $85.00 | $26.14 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $85.00 | $26.14 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 8 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Feb 3, 2025 (background checks): “At the time of the inspection the record of staff person #1 was lacking the following CPSL required documents: FBI clearance, National Sex Offender Registry clearance, Mandated Reporter training.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective May 6, 2025. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE compare with other daycares in Montgomery County?
It is tied for #277 of 403 centers in Montgomery County by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 53% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE last inspected?
Aug 20, 2026 (allocated unannounced monitoring). No violations were cited during that visit.
How much does GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $85.00 for young school-age, $85.00 for older school-age in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs GPY Upper Perkiomen BASE?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Greater Philadelphia YMCA.
Certified centers nearby
81 Main St, Pennsburg · 0.5 mi away · 60 spots Fewer citations than most Lifespan
399 Washington St, East Greenville · 0.6 mi away · 163 spots Fewer citations than most Globetrotters Academy
26 E 6th St, East Greenville · 0.9 mi away · 68 spots About typical Upper Perkiomen Child Care Center
1244 Saint Pauls Church Rd, Pennsburg · 1.4 mi away · 176 spots About typical Red Hill Christian School
208 5th St, Red Hill · 2.1 mi away · 116 spots About typical Lifespan at Hereford Elementary
1043 Gravel Pike, Hereford · 3.9 mi away About typical
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.