KinderCare Learning Center · 5 Morgan Dr, Reading
KinderCare Learning Center is a certified child care center in Reading, PA, with capacity for 154 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 (accredited) rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 12 times and confirmed violations in 5 complaint investigations. The state cited 95 violations, 15 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for health & medication (24 of 95). 39 citations came in the last 12 months, including 3 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #60 of 84 centers in Reading and has more citations per inspection than 81% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
Staff person/facility person #1 has not completed mandated reporter training within the last 60 months. This is evidenced by the previously documented mandated reporter training on file being dated 6/30/21. Staff #2 has not renewed the state police clearance or FBI clearance within the last 60 months. This is evidenced by the previously documented state police clearance on file being dated 6/28/21 and the FBI on file being dated 6/30/21.
In the back infant room there was less than 2' of space on three sides of the crib that an infant was sleeping in.
The most recently recorded alarm test was done 7/1/26, a period of greater than 30 days.
The emergency contacts for numerous children were missing from the classrooms where the children were receiving care. Missing emergency contacts included children in the front infant room, the front and back toddler rooms, the older toddler room.
Ongoing non-compliance: During the renewal inspection, the most recent health report on file for child #3 was dated 4/25/25; for child #10 it was dated 10/14/24 both periods of greater than 6 months (see code sheet for dates of birth). An acceptable plan of correction was submitted that stated "Management will require the parent provide an updated health report at least every 6 months for an infant or young toddler. A designated student file tracker and check list will be used along with a tab system to indicate required paperwork due dates and completion of forms including health reports." The correction date was 4/30/26. On 5/4/26, there was still no updated health assessment for child #3 and #10.
Ongoing non-compliance: During the renewal inspection, the most recent health assessment on file for child #5 was dated 6/25/24, and for child #6 it was dated 12/26/24, both periods of greater than 12 months. An acceptable plan of correction was submitted that stated "Management will require the parent provide an updated health report at least every 12 months for an older toddler or preschool child. A designated student file tracker and check list will be used along with a tab system to indicate required paperwork due dates and completion of forms including health reports." The correction date was 4/30/26. On 5/4/26, there was still no updated health assessment for child #5.
Ongoing non-compliance: During the renewal inspection, the health report on file for child #6 was dated 12/26/24, which was more than 60 days following the first day of attendance (see code sheet for start date). There was no health assessment on file for child #9 who has been enrolled for more than 60 days (see code sheet for start date). An acceptable plan of correction was submitted that stated "Management will ensure that all students have a health report on file within the first 60 days of care. Any child who fails to comply will have care suspended until which time there is a current health report on file. A designated student file tracker and check list will be used along with a tab system to indicate required paperwork due dates and completion of forms." The correction date was 4/30/26. On 5/4/26, there was still no health assessment on file for child #9 who has been enrolled for more than 60 days (see code sheet for start date).
Ongoing non-compliance: During the renewal inspection, there was no documentation of 2 years of experience to qualify staff #8, #9, and #10 for the assistant group supervisor position. An acceptable plan of correction was received that stated "Management will ensure that any staff listed as an assistant group supervisor will have on file: a copy of a high school diploma or GED and documented 2 years of experience with children. Management will use the designated staff file tracker and check list to maintain compliance with documentation of staff qualifications." The correction date was 4/30/26. On 5/4/26, there was still no documentation of 2 years of experience for staff #9 and #10.
Ongoing non-compliance: During the renewal inspection, there were no written references on file for staff #9. An acceptable plan of correction was submitted that stated, "Management will ensure that a facility person's record includes 2 written nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person. Management will use the designated staff file tracker and check list to ensure all required staff information is on file in accordance to regulations." The correction date was 4/30/26. On 5/4/26, there were still no references on file for staff #9.
On 2/24/26 staff person #1 was observed to be caring for children unsupervised. Staff person #1 has not completed mandated reporter training within the last 60 months. This is evidenced by the previously documented mandated reporter training on file being dated 2/8/2021. The operator could not produce a continuity of operations plan that is required by 45 CFR 98.41(a)(1)(vii).
As of the renewal inspection on 2/24/26, the most recent mandated reporter training on file for staff #1 was dated 2/8/21, a period of greater than 60 months. There was a period of greater than 60 months between the mandated reporter trainings for staff #2. Training was completed 8/27/20 and the next one was dated 1/26/26. There was a disclosure statement with a signature date of 12/16/25 on file for staff #3 (see code sheet for start date). The child abuse clearance for staff #10 was dated 6/2/25, which is after the start date. The FBI clearance is dated 8/5/25 which is greater than 45 days after the start date (see code sheet for start date). Staff #11 had a child abuse clearance dated 3/5/25 which was after the start date (see code sheet for start date).
There was a gap of greater than 12 months in the emergency plan training for staff #1, #2, #4, #5, #6, #7 with training recorded on 2/6/24 and next on 4/7/25. The most recent emergency plan training for staff #9 was dated 12/5/24.
There was trash on the floor in the hallway. In the school age room there was Chapstick, cereal, smashed fruit, and trash on the floor several hours after before school care.
The pad on the soft climber in the front young toddler room and the soft seat in the Preschool room were frayed.
Child #11 was sleeping in a crib and there was less than 2 feet of space on three sides of the crib.
On 2/24/26, the most recent health report on file for child #3 was dated 4/25/25; for child #10 it was dated 10/14/24 both periods of greater than 6 months (see code sheet for dates of birth).
On 2/24/26, the most recent health assessment on file for child #5 was dated 6/25/24, and for child #6 it was dated 12/26/24, both periods of greater than 12 months.
There was insufficient documentation of immunization against Hepatitis A for child #2, Pneumococcal for child #4, and HIB for child #8.
There was an EpiPen for child #12 in the school age room that expired on 12/31/25.
Staff #1 had a health assessment on 5/22/23 and next on 8/7/25. Staff #4 had a health assessment on 1/12/24 and next on 2/1/26. Both were periods of greater than 24 months.
Written notification of safe routes was not posted by the operator at a conspicuous location in the child care facility.
The health report on file for child #6 was dated 12/26/24, which was more than 60 days following the first day of attendance (see code sheet for start date). There was no health assessment on file for child #9 who has been enrolled for more than 60 days (see code sheet for start date)
The Pediatric 1st Aid for staff #1 was not renewed prior to the expiration of the previous certificate. The previous one was issued 4/6/23 and the next one is dated 5/22/25.
The most recent documentation of fire safety training for staff #1 was dated 3/18/24. There was a gap of greater than 1 year in the fire safety training for staff #2, #4, #5, #6, #7.
There was a written evaluation for staff #1 on 3/6/24 and next on 4/14/25 a period of greater than 12 months. For staff #2the evaluations were done 3/26/24 and then 4/10/25. The most current written evaluation for staff #4 is dated 3/26/24, more than 12 months ago. The most current written evaluation for staff #7 is dated 10/22/24.
There was no documentation of 2 years of experience to qualify staff #8, #9, and #10 for the assistant group supervisor position.
The agreement of child #4 was not signed by the operator.
The emergency contact information for child #8 did not include the address of the physician.
The emergency contact information for child #5, #6, and #10 did not include the work address and phone number of the enrolling parent.
The emergency contact information for child #8 did not include the insurance policy number.
The emergency contact information for child #5and #8 did not include the address of the release persons. There was no name, address and telephone number of a release person listed for child #10.
There were numerous children in most classrooms that did not have the emergency contact information present in the space where they were receiving care.
The most recent emergency contact and fee agreement for child #5, #6, #8, and #10 were dated from February of 2025 and had not been updated or reviewed in more than 6 months.
There was no parental consent for the administration of minor first aid for child #1, and child #9.
There were no agreements on file for child #1, #7, and #9.
The file of staff #3 did not include the staff person's current address.
There were no written references on file for staff #9.
The operator did not notify the regional licensing office within 24 hours, and did not submit a written report to the regional licensing office within 72 hours of child #1 receiving emergency room treatment.
During an unannounced inspection, the fire alarm test log was reviewed. The alarm was tested 12/10/25 and next on 1/12/26, a period of greater than 30 days.
Show 57 older citations
Throughout the morning of 9/3/25 during an unannounced inspection, there were 12 preschool children in the room with one staff; 11 young and older toddlers in a room with 2 staff; there were 6 young toddlers with 1 staff; there were 8 older toddlers with 1 staff.
On 9/3/25 during an unannounced inspection, the most recent fire drill logged was on 6/17/25, a gap of greater than 60 days.
On 9/3/25 during an unannounced inspection, the most recent fire alarm test logged was on 7/11/25, a period of greater than 30 days.
Continued Non-Compliance: During an unannounced inspection on 6/16/25, the file of staff #1 and #2 were reviewed. There was no documentation of a DHS FBI clearance and there was no receipt demonstrating that the staff had been fingerprinted. An acceptable plan of corrections was received stating "Receipt was obtained for #1 and #2 until actual clearance was obtained. Provider will make sure to obtain copy of proof of clearance (receipt) until physical clearances are obtained prior to staff beginning employment." The correction date was 6/20/25. On 7/28/25, staff #2 did not have FBI clearance or a receipt for fingerprinting on file.
The hopscotch rug in the preschool room was frayed on the edge with a loop of the binding creating a tripping hazard.
On 7/1/25, staff #1 placed child #1 in a storage closet in the classroom and closed the closet door leaving the child unattended in the closet for approximately 1 minute. Facility Person #1 was suspended and then terminated.
On 7/1/25, staff #1 placed child #1 in a storage closet in the classroom and closed the closet door leaving the child unattended in the closet for approximately 1 minute. Facility Person #1 was suspended and then terminated.
During an unannounced inspection on 6/16/25, the file of staff #1 and #2 (see code sheet for start dates) were reviewed. There was no documentation of a DHS FBI clearance and there was no receipt demonstrating that the staff had been fingerprinted.
During an unannounced inspection on 6/16/25, the fire alarm test log indicated that the most recent alarm test was on 4/17/25.
During an unannounced inspection on 4/15/25, staff #1 did not have clearances from a state she lived in during the previous five years and was on site (see code sheet for start date). Staff #2 was onsite and did not have a signed disclosure statement on file (see code sheet for start date).
On 4/15/25 there was evidence of roaches in the kitchen area. Additionally, there were ants on the desk in the office.
As of the unannounced inspection on 4/15/25, the most recent fire drill was 1/9/25.
As of the unannounced inspection on 4/15/25, the most recent alarm test was on 1/9/25.
Staff person #2 only had 1 written reference on file.
Staff #3 (see code sheet for hire date) did not have clearances from the state in which she resided in the previous 5 years. Staff #5 (see code sheet for hire date) did not have FBI clearance. Staff #7 (see code sheet for hire date) did not have NSOR on file. Staff #8 (see code sheet for hire date) did not have NSOR on file.
The first aid kit on the bus did not contain water. Staff #10 reported that it is the only first aid kit they have on the bus during the school year.
During the renewal inspection, the closer arm on the front door kept coming apart causing the door to not function properly.
During the inspection an child #5 was asleep in a crib. There was not two feet of space on three sides of the crib.
During the inspection, a child came out of the bathroom after toileting and did not wash his hands.
There was no documentation of TB screening and results on file for staff #4.
There was no documentation of an exam for communicable diseases for staff #1, and #2. The health assessment for staff #7 indicated a communicable disease with no further information provided.
The initial health assessment and immunization record for child #2 was dated 12/26/24, more than 60 days following the first day of attendance (see code sheet for start date). The initial health assessment and immunization record for child #3 was dated 1/6/23, more than 60 days following the first day of attendance (see code sheet for start date).
Staff #3, #4, and #6 did not have sufficient documentation of experience to qualify as an AGS.
There was no high school diploma on file for staff #9 to qualify as an Aide.
The fee agreement of child #2 did not include the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released.
The emergency contact information for child #1 did not include a policy number. The emergency contact information for child #3 did not include the health insurance coverage or policy number.
The emergency contact information for child #4 did not include the address of the individuals designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
Staff #4 did not have 2 written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
On 11/13/24, two older toddlers were left unsupervised on the playground for approximately 1-5 minutes.
Files for staff person #1-#5, see code sheet for hire date, all contained either expired or incomplete updated PA state police clearances. Updated clearances for staff #1-#5 were all requested on 9/29/23, however, these updated clearances for staff #1-#5 were printed and placed on file without a confirmed record result. This was corrected the day of inspection.
It was observed in the toddler back room that a gym mat had an area that was ripped and worn, leaving this mat not in good repair.
It was observed in the toddler front room that the garbage can used for diapering did not contain a lid.
It was observed in the Discovery Preschool room that a AA battery was on the floor accessible to the mouthing children in that room.
It was observed in both the front and rear infant rooms as well as in discovery preschool and the preschool room that cribs and cots, containing resting children, did not have at least 2 feet of space on three sides of those cots and cribs in use.
It was observed during a diaper change in the infant room that staff did not ensure that the infant's hands were washed after diapering. Also during this observed diaper change, the changing table surface, although sprayed, was not properly sanitized due to the cleaner not being left to sit on the surface for the required time it would take to sanitize that surface according to the instructions.
File for staff person #2 contained a health assessment dated 6/27/22, but this written health assessment on file had documented that no physical was conducted.
It was observed that although the established indoor space for the infant room rear measured for seven children, there were eight infants present and receiving care in that space at the time of inspection.
It was observed that the facility's emergency plan was updated in February 2023, but the updated plan was only sent to the local township and not sent to the county emergency management agency.
File for child #3, see code sheet for enrollment date, did not contain a health report and the child has been enrolled for more than 60 days at the facility. File for child #4, see code sheet for enrollment date, did not contain an initial health report. The only health report observed on file the day of inspection was dated 9/20/22.
File for staff person #1 documented that they participated in a fire safety training on 9/17/21, but no documentation on file verifies that staff person #1 has participated in an updated annual fire safety training since that date.
File for staff person #3 did not contain a written evaluation completed by the director within the last 12 months.
Emergency contact form for child #3 did not contain the name, address and telephone number of the child's physician or source of medical care. This same form also did not contain the child's health insurance coverage information and policy number.
It was observed that staff person #2 and #3 were not actively supervising the children in the preschool classroom. Staff person #2 and #3 could not see all children based on their placement in the classroom and were sending children unsupervised into the classroom cubby room to obtain their belongings.
It was observed during a complaint investigation on 3/23/23, that staff person #1 was holding child #1 by their wrist while the child was visibly upset and trying to pull away. It was stated during staff interviews that children are restrained, by restricting their movement, as a common practice when staff feel behaviors warrant it at the facility.
It was observed that the emergency plan letter, which had been provided to each enrolled family, did not contain all of the facility's emergency plan procedures as described in 3270.27(a). The emergency plan letter given to parents did not contain the facility's lockdown procedure or accommodations for infants, toddlers, those with special needs or chronic medical conditions.
File for child #3 and #4, both young toddlers, did not contain an updated health report dated within the last 6 months as required.
File for child #5 did not contain a review of the status all immunizations recommended by the ACIP.
It was observed that the facility did not have verification that the emergency plan was sent to the local municipality.
It was observed and stated that the facility did not send to the local traffic authority the facility's annual traffic letter, and did not post the facility's pick up and drop off procedures.
File for staff person #2, currently employed as an assistant group supervisor, contained a high school diploma, and 15 credit hours in a human service related field from an accredited college, but did not contain adequate documentation of 1 year experience working with children.
Agreement for child #1 did not specify the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released.
Emergency contact form for child #2 did not contain the address of the child's physician.
Emergency contact form for child #2 did not contain the enrolling parent's work address or work telephone number.
Emergency contact form for child #2 did not contain the release person's address.
File for staff person #1, employed more than 90 days at facility, did not contain documentation of completion of pediatric CPR and first aid training.
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, child #1 was left unsupervised in the preschool room. At approximately 4:31pm, it was stated that staff person #1 had lined up the children in the preschool room and walked the children over to the prek room. At 4:35pm, parent of child #1 entered facility and signed child out for pick up on the Sign Out Record Sheet used by facility, but child #1 was unable to be located in the prek room with staff person #1. Child #1 was found hiding under the table alone in the preschool room. Director was notified immediately of the incident via a phone call at 4:42pm. Child was left unsupervised for a period of time between 4-11 minutes and was in the primary care group of staff person #1.
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, child #1 was left unsupervised in the preschool room. At approximately 4:31pm, it was stated that staff person #1 had lined up the children in the preschool room and walked the children over to the prek room. At 4:35pm, parent of child #1 entered facility and signed child out for pick up on the Sign Out Record Sheet used by facility, but child#1 was unable to be located in the prek room with staff person #1. Child #1 was found hiding under the table alone in the preschool room. Director was notified immediately of the incident via a phone call at 4:42pm. Child was left unsupervised for a period of time between 4-11 minutes and was in the primary care group of staff person #1.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $91.00 | $68.00 |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $91.00 | $68.00 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $87.00 | $65.00 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $82.00 | $62.00 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $78.00 | $58.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $73.00 | $51.00 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $73.00 | $51.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has KinderCare Learning Center had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 15 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Sep 9, 2026 (background checks): “Staff person/facility person #1 has not completed mandated reporter training within the last 60 months. This is evidenced by the previously documented mandated reporter training on file being dated 6/30/21. Staff #2 has…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about KinderCare Learning Center?
Pennsylvania lists 5 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is KinderCare Learning Center’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4 (accredited), effective Sep 10, 2025. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does KinderCare Learning Center compare with other daycares in Reading?
It is tied for #60 of 84 centers in Reading by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 81% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was KinderCare Learning Center last inspected?
Sep 9, 2026 (allocated unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does KinderCare Learning Center cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $91.00 for newborn, $91.00 for infant, $87.00 for young toddler, $82.00 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs KinderCare Learning Center?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is KUEHG Corporation.
Certified centers nearby
3 Cloister Ct, Reading · 0.4 mi away · 108 spots About typical Kidz Paradise
1340 W Wyomissing Blvd, West Lawn · 0.5 mi away · 88 spots Among the most cited KCE Champions LLC at Cornwall Terrace Elem School
3100 Iroquois Ave, Reading · 1.0 mi away More citations than most Raqia Children Center LLC
3436 Penn Ave, Reading · 1.3 mi away · 40 spots About typical La Salle Academy
440 Holland St, Reading · 1.6 mi away · 36 spots More citations than most Hadassah Children Center
3836 Penn Ave, Reading · 1.6 mi away · 89 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.