My Day Care
My Day Care is a certified child care center in Ebensburg, PA, with capacity for 76 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 7 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 62 violations, 6 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for building & playground safety (15 of 62). 23 citations came in the last 12 months. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #26 of 38 centers in Cambria County and has more citations per inspection than 85% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The toilet in the bathroom of Children's House lacked a handwashing sign.
Observed an electrical outlet to the left of the shelf containing LEGOS which lacked a protective receptacle cover.
Observed a black with white polka dots block with exposed foam in the Young Toddler Room.
Observed rest equipment not labeled for the use of a specific child in the Older Toddler Room.
The file of Child #5 lacked an updated health report at least every 12 months for an older toddler or preschool child. The file of Child #5 contained a health report dated 4/30/26 with a previous one dated 1/15/25.
The file of Child #2, an infant, lacked Rotavirus, DTAP/DTP/TD, HIB, Pneumococcal, and Polio immunizations according to the recommendation of the ACIP. Child #2 had documentation of one Rotavirus immunization, one DTAP/DTP/TD immunization, one HIB immunization, one Pneumococcal immunization and one Polio immunization.
The health report for Child #5 did not include a statement that the child is able to participate in child care and appears to be free from contagious or communicable disease.
The health report for Child #3 did not include a statement that age-appropriate screenings recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics were conducted since the time of the previous health report required by this section.
The file of Staff #1 lacked a health assessment conducted within 12 months prior to providing initial service in a child care setting (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 contained a health assessment dated 9/9/24.
The file of Staff #1 lacked an initial health assessment which included tuberculosis screening by Mantoux method at initial employment (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 had a Mantoux test read date of 7/25/24.
The operator did not conspicuously post the menu at least 1 week in advance or provide a menu to each family.
Observed bottles which were not labeled with the child's name in the Infant Room.
The file of Staff #4 lacked documentation of completing Pediatric first aid and CPR by a PQAS certified trainer within 90 days of hire (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #4 contained documentation of completing Pediatric first and CPR on 2/19/26.
Staff persons #2 and #5 have not completed the following required pre- service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric first aid and CPR by a PQAS certified trainer.
The file of Staff #1 lacked documentation of meeting one of the applicable staff qualifications for the position in which the person was performing.
The files of Staff #3 and #4, who were designated as assistant group supervisors, lacked documentation of 2 years' experience with children.
The file of Child #4 did not contain a child service report completed at least every 6 months (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Child #4 contained a child service report dated 4/22/26.
The agreement for Child #2 did not specify the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released.
The files of Children #1, #2, and #4 contained the original agreement. The facility did not make a copy for the files and give the original to the parents.
Emergency contact information for Child #5 did not include the address and telephone number of the child's physician or source of medical care.
Emergency contact information for Child #4 did not include the complete work address of the enrolling parent. Emergency contact information for Child #5 did not include the work address of the enrolling parent.
Emergency contact information for Child #4 did not include the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
The facility's current certificate of compliance was not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents.
Show 40 older citations
2nd citation. Previously cited on 5/21/25. Based on interviews, Child #1 exited the facility unbeknownst to staff. When Staff #1 was interviewed, Staff #1 indicated staff and children prepared to go to the outdoor play space between 10:20 and 10:30 AM. Staff #1 indicated he/she helped children put on their coats and shoes and replaced a child's blanket in the cubby before going towards the rear exit. Staff #1 indicated as he/she approached the exit, Staff #2 brought Child #1 into the center after being returned by an unknown person. Staff #1 stated Child #1 was assigned to Staff #2 and was unsure how long Child #1 was outside. When Staff #2 was interviewed, Staff #2 indicated the children started cleaning up to go outside to the play space between 9:50 and 9:55 AM. Staff #2 indicated when children were done putting away the toys, staff helped children with putting on their coats and shoes. Staff #2 indicated while counting children in the room, a person knocked on the rear exit around 10:05 AM and returned Child #1. Staff #2 indicated the person stated he/she found Child #1 outside, but the person did not specify where. Staff #2 stated he/she was assigned Child #1. When Staff #3…
The file of Staff #1 lacked a National Sex Offender Registry Certificate updated every 60 months. The file of Staff #1 contained a NSOR dated 3/12/25 with a previous one dated 2/24/20.
Based on interviews, Child #1 exited the facility unbeknownst to staff. When Staff #1 was interviewed, Staff #1 indicated staff and children prepared to go to the outdoor play space between 10:20 and 10:30 AM. Staff #1 indicated he/she helped children put on their coats and shoes and replaced a child's blanket in the cubby before going towards the rear exit. Staff #1 indicated as he/she approached the exit, Staff #2 brought Child #1 into the center after being returned by an unknown person. Staff #1 stated Child #1 was assigned to Staff #2 and was unsure how long Child #1 was outside. When Staff #2 was interviewed, Staff #2 indicated the children started cleaning up to go outside to the play space between 9:50 and 9:55 AM. Staff #2 indicated when children were done putting away the toys, staff helped children with putting on their coats and shoes. Staff #2 indicated while counting children in the room, a person knocked on the rear exit around 10:05 AM and returned Child #1. Staff #2 indicated the person stated he/she found Child #1 outside, but the person did not specify where. Staff #2 stated he/she was assigned Child #1. When Staff #3 was interviewed, Staff #3 indicated staff…
Based on interviews, Child #1 exited the facility unbeknownst to staff. When Staff #1 was interviewed, Staff #1 indicated staff and children prepared to go to the outdoor play space between 10:20 and 10:30 AM. Staff #1 indicated he/she helped children put on their coats and shoes and replaced a child's blanket in the cubby before going towards the rear exit. Staff #1 indicated as he/she approached the exit, Staff #2 brought Child #1 into the center after being returned by an unknown person. Staff #1 stated Child #1 was assigned to Staff #2 and was unsure how long Child #1 was outside. When Staff #2 was interviewed, Staff #2 indicated the children started cleaning up to go outside to the play space between 9:50 and 9:55 AM. Staff #2 indicated when children were done putting away the toys, staff helped children with putting on their coats and shoes. Staff #2 indicated while counting children in the room, a person knocked on the rear exit around 10:05 AM and returned Child #1. Staff #2 indicated the person stated he found Child #1 outside, but the person did not specify where. Staff #2 stated he/she was assigned Child #1. When Staff #3 was interviewed, Staff #3 indicated staff and…
Based on interviews, Child #1 exited the facility unbeknownst to staff. When Staff #1 was interviewed, Staff #1 indicated staff and children prepared to go to the outdoor play space between 10:20 and 10:30 AM. Staff #1 indicated he/she helped children put on their coats and shoes and replaced a child's blanket in the cubby before going towards the rear exit. Staff #1 indicated as he/she approached the exit, Staff #2 brought Child #1 into the center after being returned by an unknown person. Staff #1 stated Child #1 was assigned to Staff #2 and was unsure how long Child #1 was outside. When Staff #2 was interviewed, Staff #2 indicated the children started cleaning up to go outside to the play space between 9:50 and 9:55 AM. Staff #2 indicated when children were done putting away the toys, staff helped children with putting on their coats and shoes. Staff #2 indicated while counting children in the room, a person knocked on the rear exit around 10:05 AM and returned Child #1. Staff #2 indicated the person stated he/she found Child #1 outside, but the person did not specify where. Staff #2 stated he/she was assigned Child #1. When Staff #3 was interviewed, Staff #3 indicated staff…
The facility did not have an emergency plan that provides for a method for facility persons to contact parents as soon as reasonably possible when an emergency situation arises.
The letter provided to the parent explaining emergency procedures did not address accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions.
Observed Baby Oilogic Slumber and Sleep Essential Oil Linen Mist which indicated "keep out of the reach of children" in a black backpack located in a cubby outside of the Infant Room which was accessible to children.
The first-aid kit in the Infant Room lacked the following: soap, tweezers, tape, scissors, and disposable, nonporous gloves.
Observed exposed screws on the siding on the back wall by the basketball hoop in the outdoor play space.
Observed rest equipment not labeled for the use of a specific child in the Young Toddler Room and the Preschool Room.
The file of Child #1, a 17-month-old, lacked Pneumococcal immunizations according to the recommendations of the ACIP. Child #1 had documentation of 3 Pneumococcal immunizations.
The file of Staff #2 lacked a health assessment conducted within 12 months prior to providing initial service in a child care setting (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #2 contained a health assessment dated 11/30/23. The file of Staff #3 lacked a health assessment conducted every 24 months. The file of Staff #3 contained a current health assessment dated 5/2/24 with a previous one dated 4/28/22. The file of Staff #4 lacked a health assessment conducted every 24 months. The file of Staff #4 contained a current health assessment dated 4/10/25 with a previous one dated 7/28/22.
The facility had a policy that addressed the recognition of potential signs and symptoms of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma and strategies for coping with a crying, fussing, or distraught child, but the policy did not address the prevention and identification of child maltreatment.
The file of Staff #2 lacked documentation of completing pediatric first aid/CPR from a PQUAS approved trainer and a PQUAS approved curriculum within 90 days of their date of hire (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #2 contained documentation of completing pediatric first aid and CPR on 4/12/24. The file of Staff #2 lacked documentation of completing health and safety training within 90 days of hire (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #2 contained documentation of completing health and safety training on 5/1/24.
Emergency contact information was not present in the Infant Room for the children receiving care in the space.
The file of Staff #5 lacked two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person. The file of Staff #5 contained one written, nonfamily reference.
The operator did not provide the parent of each child enrolled with information on how to access the regulations in this chapter electronically and with instructions for contacting the appropriate regional child care office.
Based on interviews, staff were unaware of a staff person who was responsible for compliance with this chapter in the Director's absence.
Observed 1 pack 'n play with a loose sheet in the Young Infant Room creating a potential suffocation hazard. Observed 2 pack 'n plays with loose sheets in the Older Infant Room creating a potential suffocation hazard.
The file of Staff #2 lacked a dated disclosure statement.
Observed an electrical outlet to the left of the changing table located by the bathrooms which lacked a protective receptacle cover. Observed an electrical outlet to the right of the pack 'n plays in the Older Infant Room which lacked a protective receptacle cover.
Observed peeling paint on the fence to the right of the gate leading to the outdoor play space.
Observed 3 cracked magna tiles with exposed magnets in the Preschool Room.
The file of Staff #1 lacked a health assessment conducted within 12 months prior to providing initial service in a child care setting (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 contained a health assessment dated 8/6/24.
At the time of the inspection, there was not a first aid kit present in the school space where 5 school age children were observed in care.
Observed in the preschool room on the purple wall near the entrance to the school age room, flaking plaster. Observed in the preschool room on the green wall near the "car center" flaking plaster.
Observed in the preschool room, 3 broken Magni-Tiles.
Observed an Epi Pen for child #1 but no medication log.
The smoke detection testing log indicated testing more than 30 days apart due to the fact the dates were 2-2-24 and 3-13-24 which is 40 days.
The file of child #2 had a health assessment on file. However, the document was not dated. Therefore, it could not be assessed for timeliness.
The file of staff #1 lacked documentation of completing Fire Safety training.
The file of staff #2 had documentation of completing Mandated Reporter training more than 90 from initial hire due to the fact it was dated 4-27-24, (see LIS CODE sheet).
The files of children #1 and #2 lacked emergency contact forms with the full, complete work addresses of the enrolling parents.
At the time of reviewing the Emergency Plan, it lacked a Continuity of Operations.
Observed the following in the playground: a white section of fence located along the back adjacent with the tan building was detached causing a pinch or crush hazard; the bottom half of the white fence located at the corner near the sandbox was cracked causing a pinch or crush hazard; and the green carpet was not secure across the width of the playground, causing a tripping hazard.
Observed child #1 sitting in a Baby Trend brand highchair, not secured based on the manufacturer's guidelines due to the fact the highchair was missing its shoulder straps. Also observed an Everflo brand highchair missing its shoulder straps per the manufacturer's guidelines.
The file of staff #1 had documentation of completing Mandated Reporter training more than 60 months apart due to the fact the documents were dated 9-16-21 and 9-3-15.
Observed in the young toddler space, Parent's Choice diaper cream labeled for child #1 with an expiration date of 4/22.
At the time of the renewal inspection, there was not documentation showing the facility had a policy in place for the prevention of Shaken Baby Syndrome, Abusive Head Trauma, and Child Maltreatment Requirements.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $41.60 | $31.20 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has My Day Care had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 6 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on May 21, 2025 (background checks): “The file of Staff #1 lacked a National Sex Offender Registry Certificate updated every 60 months. The file of Staff #1 contained a NSOR dated 3/12/25 with a previous one dated 2/24/20.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about My Day Care?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is My Day Care’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Jul 18, 2022. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does My Day Care compare with other daycares in Cambria County?
It is tied for #26 of 38 centers in Cambria County by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 85% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was My Day Care last inspected?
May 18, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does My Day Care cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $41.60 for newborn, $41.60 for infant, $41.60 for young toddler, $41.60 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs My Day Care?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is My Day Care INC.
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.