Shawnas Early Learning Center
Shawnas Early Learning Center is a certified child care center in Uniontown, PA, with capacity for 65 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 6 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 67 violations, 6 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for records & paperwork (19 of 67). 9 citations came in the last 12 months. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #11 of 13 centers in Uniontown and has more citations per inspection than 93% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
In the PS 1 room, a window above the ground floor that opens directly to the outdoors and accessible to children was not constructed, modified or adapted to limit the opening to 6 or fewer inches.
In the PS 1 room, a handwashing sign was not posted at the toilet in the bathroom.
There were cracks observed on a large plastic storage container in the outdoor play space, which poses a potential pinch point for children in care.
The fire detection system was not tested every 30 days between 10/3 and 11/3/2025.
Staff person #1 participated in fire safety training on 9/22/2025, which was more than 12 months following the date of their previous training on 8/18/2024.
The emergency contact information for child #1 did not include the telephone number of the child's physician.
The emergency contact information for child #1 did not include the work address and telephone number of the enrolling parent; the emergency contact information for child #2 and #3 did not include the work telephone number of the enrolling parent.
The emergency contact information for child #1, #2 and #3 did not include health insurance coverage and policy number for a child under a family policy or Medical Assistance benefits, if applicable.
The emergency contact information for child #2 and #3 did not include the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
Large empty plastic storage bags were observed in a cubicle in the bathroom, accessible to children using the bathroom, which posed a potential suffocation hazard to children in care.
Show 57 older citations
The record for staff #1 included a current child abuse clearance dated 8/15/2024, which was more than 60 months following the date of their previous clearance on 8/9/2019.
The parent letter did not include the facility's plan to provide accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions.
Toxic materials labeled keep out of the reach of children were observed in the following areas that were accessible to children in care: an air freshener was plugged in by the sink in the bathroom in the older toddler room; a bottle of hand sanitizer was observed on a shelf in the PS1 room; and wet wipes and boogie wipes in an unlocked drawer in the PS2 room.
Trash that appeared to have been contaminated by human secretions was contained in a plastic-lined receptacle that was not closed in the kitchen area.
It appeared that the toilet in the bathroom in the older toddler room had not been cleaned daily, as there was a black ring observed in the toilet bowl.
An emergency drill was not conducted annually between 9/5/2023 to 10/17/2024.
The fire detection system was not tested at least once every 30 days during the following time periods: 3/6 to 4/8/2024; and 6/28 to 8/2/2024.
The emergency contact information for child #5 did not include the name, address and telephone number of the child's physician or source of medical care.
The emergency contact information for child #1 and #5 did not include the written consent signed by a parent for emergency medical care.
The emergency contact information for child #2 and #5 did not include health insurance coverage and policy number for a child under a family policy or Medical Assistance benefits, if applicable.
The emergency contact information for child #1, #2, #3 and #4 did not include the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
The record for child #1 did not contain signed parental consent for administration of minor first-aid procedures by facility staff.
The record for facility person #1, who worked in child care as a volunteer, lacked a disclosure statement for volunteers, a child abuse clearance and a NSOR verification certificate.
The emergency plan was not posted.
In the PS1 room, a Peace Lily, which is toxic to humans, was observed sitting on the children's cubbies and an air freshener, labeled keep out of the reach of children, was plugged into the wall by the front entrance, accessible to children in care.
The last documented fire drill was on 11/22/2024.
The last documented test of the fire detection system was on 11/22/2024.
Reports of incidents involving children in care are not given to the parent and copies of the reports are not retained at the facility in an accident file and in the children's files.
The record for facility person #1 lacked two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
The record for staff #2 included a current state police clearance dated 5/8/2023, which was more than 60 months following the date of their previous clearance on 2/12/2018; a current child abuse clearance dated 5/8/2023, which was more than 60 months following the date of their previous clearance on 2/20/2018; and a current FBI clearance dated 5/15/2023, which was more than 60 months following the date of their previous clearance on 4/9/2018.
The parent letter explaining the emergency procedures did not include the following subsequent updates to their plan: lockdown; accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions; and continuity of care.
In the infant/toddler room, the sink was not at a proper height and there was no platform or steps being used for it to be easily approached by the children using it.
The record for child #1 and #2 lacked documentation of the influenza vaccine being administered in accordance with the recommendations of the ACIP.
The record for staff #1 included a current health assessment dated more than 24 months following the date of their previous health assessment. The record for staff #5 and #6 lacked a health assessment, including results from tuberculin skin test, conducted within 12 months prior to providing initial service in a child care setting.
In the infant/toddler room, a bottle used by a child in care was not labeled with the child's name.
The facility's emergency plan did not provide for accommodations for infants and toddlers.
The facility's emergency plan did not provide for accommodations for shelter of children during an emergency that included lock-down.
The operator's policy and procedure to identify the prevention of shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and child maltreatment did not address the prevention and identification of child maltreatment, as per Announcement C-22-03.
Staff persons #3 and #4 completed professional development in pediatric first aid and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation on 9/9/2023 on 9/9/2023, which was more than 90 days following their date of hire.
A loose fitted sheet was observed in a pack n play intended for the use of an infant in care, which poses a suffocation risk for the child.
The facility's emergency plan did not include a continuity of operations plan to maintain compliance with 45 CFR § 98.41(a)(1)(vii).
A written statement giving the formula and feeding schedule for an infant was not obtained from the parent for the infants in care.
The facility did not maintain documentation of the submission of emergency plan updates to the appropriate local emergency management agency.
The operator did not notify local traffic safety authorities annually in writing of the location of the facility and the program's use of pedestrian and vehicular routes around the child care facility.
The agreement for child #2 did not specify the amount of the fee to be charged per day or per week.
The agreement for child #2 did not specify the child's departure time.
The emergency information for child #1 was not reviewed by a parent at least once in a 6-month period between 1/21/2022 to 9/13/2022.
The financial agreement for child #1 was not reviewed by a parent at least once in a 6-month period between 1/21/2022 to 9/13/2022.
Staff persons #1 and #2 completed professional development in pediatric first aid and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation on 7/18/2022, which was more than 90 days following their date of hire.
The file for staff #1, provisionally hired on 8/24/21, contained documentation of applying for the NSOR certificate after their first day in a child care position. The application was dated on 9/22/21. A completed NSOR certificate, dated 10/25/21, is now on file. The file for staff #3, provisionally hired on 1/25/21, contained documentation of applying for the NSOR certificate after their first day in a child care position. The application was dated 8/16/21. A completed NSOR certificate, dated 9/07/21, is now on file.
The facility's emergency plan did not include procedures for contacting parents when an emergency arises or when the emergency has ended.
The file for staff #1, with a start date of 8/24/21, did not contain documentation of training regarding the emergency plan at initial hire. Staff #1 completed the training on 9/19/21.
The operator did not have a letter to provide to parents explaining the emergency procedures.
An open bag of SWI de-icing salt was observed on the porch outside the rear exit of the pre-k 3 room.
The faucet at the sink in the pre-k 3 room was not securely attached to the sink creating a pinch point.
A crack, which created a pinch point, was observed on a plastic dump truck in the outdoor play space.
The following medications, intended for use by child #3, were not labeled with the child's name and were observed in the medication box in the infant/toddler room; Tyenol, Zarbees cough and mucus syrup, Orajel, and Nyastatin.
Orajel and nyastatin, intended for child #3 and observed in the infant/toddler room, lacked written parental consent for administration.
The facility's emergency plan did not include accommodations for infants and toddlers.
The hypothetical location for two consecutive fire drills was the same location; the infant room. The consecutive drills occurred on 7/1/21 and 8/02/21.
The operator was unable to provide proof of purchase or proof of installation of the interconnected fire alarm system as required by Act 62.
The facility's emergency plan did not contain procedures for shelter of children during a lock-down or shelter of children in place at the facility.
The file for staff #3, with a start date of 1/25/21 contained documentation of completing the health and safety training as listed in the regulation 3270.31(f) more than 90 days after their first day in a child care position. The trainings are dated 9/21/21 and 10/25/21. The file for staff #2, employed since 9/08/20, contained documentation of completing the health and safety training as listed in the regulation 3270.31(f) after the deadline of 6/17/21. The trainings were dated 9/21/21 and 10/25/21.
The file for staff #3, designated as an assistant group supervisor, did not contain proof of 2 years experience with children.
The file for child #1 contained an agreement which did not shall specify the date of the child's admission.
The file for child #2 contained emergency contact information which did not include the address of the child's physician.
Th operator did not have means of providing parents of enrolled children with information on how to access the regulations in this chapter electronically.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $55.00 | — |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $55.00 | — |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $55.00 | — |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $50.00 | — |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $45.00 | $25.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $45.00 | $25.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has Shawnas Early Learning Center had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 6 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Nov 22, 2024 (sleep safety): “Large empty plastic storage bags were observed in a cubicle in the bathroom, accessible to children using the bathroom, which posed a potential suffocation hazard to children in care.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Shawnas Early Learning Center?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Shawnas Early Learning Center’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Mar 12, 2020. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Shawnas Early Learning Center compare with other daycares in Uniontown?
It is #11 of 13 centers in Uniontown by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 93% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Shawnas Early Learning Center last inspected?
Nov 20, 2025 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does Shawnas Early Learning Center cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $55.00 for newborn, $55.00 for infant, $55.00 for young toddler, $50.00 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs Shawnas Early Learning Center?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Shawna Winslow.
Certified centers nearby
325 Connellsville St, Uniontown · 2.9 mi away · 72 spots About typical Willow Tree Learning CTR
69 Romeo Ln, Uniontown · 3.1 mi away · 92 spots Among the most cited Little Legends Program
150 Coolspring St, Uniontown · 3.3 mi away · 41 spots Among the most cited ABC School House
144 N Gallatin Ave, Uniontown · 3.3 mi away · 67 spots More citations than most Legacy Learning Center
1264 Pittsburgh Rd, Uniontown · 3.4 mi away · 52 spots More citations than most Kwailas Daycare Co
93 Jefferson St, Uniontown · 3.6 mi away · 36 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.