The Goddard School · Gibsonia
The Goddard School is a certified child care center in Gibsonia, PA, with capacity for 174 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 9 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 49 violations, 19 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). 7 citations came in the last 12 months, including 3 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #7 of 10 centers in Gibsonia and has more citations per inspection than 68% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The file for child #3 lacked a health report that included a statement that the child is able to participate in child care and appears to be free from contagious or communicable disease.
The files for children #1, #2, and #3 lacked emergency contact information that included the work addresses and work telephone numbers of the enrolling parent. The file for child #2 lacked emergency contact information that included the home address and home telephone number of the enrolling parent.
The file for child #2 lacked emergency contact information that included information on the child's special needs, as specified by the child's parent, physician, physician's assistant or CRNP, which is needed in an emergency situation.
The file for child #2 lacked emergency contact information that included the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
According to the facility's self-report and staff statements, on 10/22/25, Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 were transitioning 15 preschoolers from their classroom to the gym when Child #1 was left in the restroom which is located inside of the classroom. Staff person #4 walked into the classroom between 20 to 30 seconds after the class had left and found child #1 in the restroom. Staff Person #1 and Staff Person #2 reported that they realized Child #1 was not with the class when they were conducting the name to face check at the gym threshold. Staff Person #2 ran back to the classroom to get child #1. Child #1 was alone for 20 to 30 seconds before reuniting with their class in the gym.
According to the facility's self-report and staff statements, on 10/22/25, Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 were transitioning 15 preschoolers from their classroom to the gym when Child #1 was left in the restroom which is located inside of the classroom. Staff person #4 walked into the classroom between 20 to 30 seconds after the class had left and found child #1 in the restroom. Staff Person #1 and Staff Person #2 reported that they realized Child #1 was not with the class when they were conducting the name to face check at the gym threshold. Staff Person #2 ran back to the classroom to get child #1. Child #1 was alone for 20 to 30 seconds before reuniting with their class in the gym.
According to the facility's self-report and staff statements, on 10/22/25, Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 were transitioning 15 preschoolers from their classroom to the gym when Child #1 was left in the restroom which is located inside of the classroom. Staff person #4 walked into the classroom between 20 to 30 seconds after the class had left and found child #1 in the restroom. Staff Person #1 and Staff Person #2 reported that they realized Child #1 was not with the class when they were conducting the name to face check at the gym threshold. Staff Person #2 ran back to the classroom to get child #1. Child #1 was alone for 20 to 30 seconds before reuniting with their class in the gym.
Based on staff interviews, it was determined that Staff Person #1 used physical discipline. Staff Person #1 was observed lifting a child in an aggressive manner that caused the child's neck to snap backward. Additionally, with the child facing Staff Person #1, Staff Person #1 lifted the child by placing their arms over the child and under the child's armpits and then forcefully placed the child down onto the floor. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The operator self-reported that Staff person #1 and #2 served a Nutrigrain bar containing oats to child #1 who has a documented oat allergy. Child #1 began vomiting after eating the bar and the parents were called to pick up the child.
The file for staff person #2 who was hired on (See LIS Code Sheet) as an assistant group supervisor lacked an NSOR verification certificate that was completed in the last 60 months. The NSOR verification certificate in the file was dated 11/7/19.
Show 39 older citations
The file for child #1 whom is a preschool child lacked a health report that was completed 12 months from the previous health report. The health reports in the file were dated 8/15/23 and 9/3/24.
The files for staff persons #1, #3, and #4 lacked firesafety training that was completed 12 months from the previous firesafety training. Staff person #1 firesafety training in the file was dated 5/11/23 and 6/18/24. Staff person #3 firesafety training in the file was dated 6/23/23 and 7/22/24. Staff person #4 firesafety training in the file was dated 7/7/23 and 8/7/24.
Based on a self-report and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised on the outdoor playground. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #1 saw child #1 playing on the slide less than a minute after the children and staff went inside to their classroom. Staff #2 went outside to the playground and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the classroom.
*Based on a self-report and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised on the outdoor playground. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #1 saw child #1 playing on the slide less than a minute after the children and staff went inside to their classroom. Staff #2 went outside to the playground and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the classroom.
Based on a self-report and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised on the outdoor playground. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #1 saw child #1 playing on the slide less than a minute after the children and staff went inside to their classroom. Staff #2 went outside to the playground and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the classroom.
*Based on a self-report and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised on the outdoor playground. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #1 saw child #1 playing on the slide less than a minute after the children and staff went inside to their classroom. Staff #2 went outside to the playground and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the classroom.
*Based on a self-report and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised on the outdoor playground. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #1 saw child #1 playing on the slide less than a minute after the children and staff went inside to their classroom. Staff #2 went outside to the playground and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the classroom.
Based on a self-report and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised on the outdoor playground. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #1 saw child #1 playing on the slide less than a minute after the children and staff went inside to their classroom. Staff #2 went outside to the playground and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the classroom.
The files for staff persons #2 and #3 lacked disclosure statements that included witness signatures and dates.
The file for staff person #1 lacked mandated reporter training that was completed with 90 days from the hire date (See LIS Code Sheet). The mandated reporter training in the file was dated 1/24/24.
The file for staff person #4 lacked a high school diploma.
The file for staff person #1 lacked a child abuse clearance that was updated 60 months from the previous child abuse clearance. The child abuse clearances in the file are dated 6/28/18 and 7/1/23. The file for staff person #2 who was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet) lacked a valid FBI Clearance. The FBI Clearance was requested through the Department of Justice instead of the Department of Human Services. The file for staff person #4 lacked a State Police Clearance prior to the hire date (See LIS Code Sheet). The State Police Clearance in the file was dated 8/18/23.
In the Two's 2 classroom there was a heat lamp on an aquarium that measured 125 degrees accessible to the children in care.
In the Preschool 2 classroom a cracked plastic toy car carrier was observed causing rough edges, sharp corners, and pinch and crush points.
The file for staff person #3 lacked an adult health assessment that included accurate results of the communicable disease examination. The health assessment was marked yes for communicable diseases.
The file for staff #1 lacked mandated reporter training that was completed 90 days from the date of hire (See LIS Code Sheet). The mandated reporter training in the file was dated 9/22/23.
The files for children #1, #2, and #4 lacked an agreement that specified the amount of the fee to be charged.
The file for child #6 lacked emergency contact information that included information on the child's special needs, as specified by the child's parent, physician, physician's assistant or CRNP, which is needed in an emergency situation.
The file for child #1 lacked emergency contact information that included the city, state, and zip code of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released. The files for children #3 and #5 lacked emergency contact information that included the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
Based on a self-report, as well as written and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised in the classroom. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #2 heard child #1 knocking on the classroom window less than a minute after the classroom went outside onto the playground. Staff #2 retrieved a key to unlock the classroom door and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the playground.
Based on a self-report, as well as written and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised in the classroom. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #2 heard child #1 knocking on the classroom window less than a minute after the classroom went outside onto the playground. Staff #2 retrieved a key to unlock the classroom door and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the playground.
Based on a self-report, as well as written and verbal statements, it was determined that Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 left child #1 unsupervised in the classroom. This occurred for a very short period of time as Staff #2 heard child #1 knocking on the classroom window less than a minute after the classroom went outside onto the playground. Staff #2 retrieved a key to unlock the classroom door and Child #1 was reunited with Staff #1 and Staff #2 in the playground.
The file for staff person #3, whom was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet), lacked an FBI Clearance prior to the hire date. The FBI Clearance in the file was dated 6/9/23.
The file for staff person #1 lacked proof of one of the qualification levels specified at §3270.35(b)(1)-(4).
The files for staff persons #2 and #3 lacked a high school diploma or a general educational development certificate.
The file for staff person #1, whom was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet), lacked a valid FBI Clearance. The FBI Clearance was completed by the Department of Education not the Department of Human Services.
The file for staff person #1 lacked an initial health assessment.
The file for staff person #2 lacked a high school diploma or a general educational development certificate and 2 years experience with children.
The file for staff person #1, whom was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet) lacked an NSOR verification certificate within 45 days of hire and was not removed from the childcare position. Staff person #1 was suspended on 3/13/23, which was 69 days from the date of hire. The file for staff person #2, whom was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet) lacked a disclosure statement that was completed prior to the hire date. The disclosure statement in the file is dated 2/27/23. The file for staff person #2 also lacked Illinois clearances. The staff person had lived in Illinois in the past five years prior to moving to Pennsylvania. Staff person #2 was suspended within 45 days from the date of hire. The file for staff person #5, whom was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet), lacked an NSOR verification certificate. The NSOR verification certificate in the file was dated 1/5/23. The file for staff person #6, whom was hired as an assistant group supervisor on (See LIS Code Sheet), lacked an NSOR verification certificate within 45 days of hire and was not removed from the childcare position. Staff person #6 was…
The file for child #3 lacked a health report that had the date the health report was completed.
The files for staff persons #2 and #11 lacked initial health assessments. The file for staff person #7 lacked an initial health assessment prior to the hire date (See LIS Code Sheet). The health assessment in the file is dated 1/29/23.
The file for staff person #4 lacked an adult health assessment that included the correct results of the communicable disease examination. The file for staff person #9 lacked an adult health assessment that included an examination for communicable diseases and the results of that examination.
The file for staff person #5 lacked an adult health assessment that included the physician's or CRNP's assessment of the person's suitability to provide child care.
The Fire Drill and Fire Detection Log was observed there were 40 days between 1/18/23 and 2/27/23.
The file for staff person #4 lacked a high school diploma.
The file for staff person #12 lacked a high school diploma.
The file for child #2 lacked an agreement that specified the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released.
The files for children #1, #2, and #3 lacked emergency contact information that included the parent's home and work telephone numbers.
The files for staff persons #3, #10, #11, and #12 lacked two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
About this center
Common questions
Has The Goddard School had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 19 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Nov 3, 2025 (staff ratios): “According to the facility's self-report and staff statements, on 10/22/25, Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 were transitioning 15 preschoolers from their classroom to the gym when Child #1 was left in the restroom which…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about The Goddard School?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is The Goddard School’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Jun 2, 2023. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does The Goddard School compare with other daycares in Gibsonia?
It is #7 of 10 centers in Gibsonia by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 68% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was The Goddard School last inspected?
Jan 23, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
Who runs The Goddard School?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Play Learn Thrive LLC.
Certified centers nearby
2484 Sample Rd, Allison Park · 1.3 mi away · 56 spots Among the most cited Tender Care Learning Center-Hampton
2852 Oxford Blvd, Allison Park · 1.6 mi away · 83 spots More citations than most Royal Oak Nursery School and Kindergarten
4413 Mount Royal Blvd, Allison Park · 1.7 mi away · 115 spots Among the most cited Kiddie Tech
9600 Babcock Blvd, Allison Park · 1.7 mi away · 101 spots About typical Early Years Community Learning Center
4943 William Flynn Hwy, Gibsonia · 1.8 mi away · 42 spots About typical North Pittsburgh Childrens House
5031 Oakview Dr, Gibsonia · 1.9 mi away · 19 spots Fewer citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.