The Learning Lamp at Portage
The Learning Lamp at Portage is a certified child care center in Portage, PA, with capacity for 42 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 3 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 7 times. The state cited 49 violations, 4 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for records & paperwork (18 of 49). 13 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #16 of 38 centers in Cambria County and has more citations per inspection than 71% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
Observed a pair of adult scissors in a pen holder on the teacher's desk in Room 101 which were accessible to children.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 11/5/25. Observed a first-aid kit on top of a table beside the teacher's desk in Room 103 which was accessible to children.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 11/5/25. The facility was able to provide written documentation that the fire detection system was tested annually by a fire safety professional. The facility provided documentation that the fire detection system was inspected by a fire safety professional on 8/5/24 and 8/7/25. The inspection report dated 8/7/25 indicated 1 deficiency, and the facility was unable to provide documentation that the system had been repaired and passed with a follow-up inspection
The file of Staff #2 lacked the results of the National Sex Offender Registry Certificate prior to or on the date Staff #2 began working in a child care position (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #2 contained a NSOR dated 10/10/25.
On 11/5/25 observed a first-aid kit on top of a mini refrigerator in Room 103 which was accessible to children.
On 11/5/25 observed wooden blocks with rough edges in both Room 101 and Room 103. Observed a chipped bin labeled "Tuesday" with rough edges in Room 101.
The file of Child #3 lacked an updated health report at least every 12 months for an older toddler or preschool child. The file of Child #3 contained a health report dated 6/10/24.
Child #2, a 5-year-old, lacked Hepatitis A immunizations according to the recommendations of the ACIP. Child #2 had no documentation of Hepatitis A immunizations.
The health report for Child #1 did not include a statement that the child is able to participate in child care and appears to be free from contagious or communicable disease.
The health reports for Children #1 and #2 did not include a statement that age-appropriate screenings recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics were conducted since the time of the previous health report required by this section.
The facility was able to provide written documentation that the fire detection system was tested annually by a fire safety professional. The facility provided documentation that the fire detection system was inspected by a fire safety professional on 8/5/24 and 8/7/25. The inspection report dated 8/7/25 indicated 1 deficiency, and the facility was unable to provide documentation that the system had been repaired and passed with a follow-up inspection
Child #2 lacked a health report no later than 60 days following the first day of attendance at the facility. Child #2 who had an admission date of 8/21/25 had a health report in the file, but it was not dated.
The file of Staff #1 lacked documentation of participating, at least annually, in fire safety training conducted by a fire protection professional. The file of Staff #1 contained documentation of fire safety training completed on 9/25/25 with a previous one completed on 2/22/24.
The file of Staff #1 lacked a written evaluation on a regular basis, a minimum of one evaluation every 12 months (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 did not contain a written evaluation.
The emergency contact form and agreement for Child #2 were not reviewed at least once in a 6-month period. Child #2's emergency contact was signed on 1/3/25 and reviewed on 9/15/25. Child #2's agreement was signed on 1/2/25 with no reviews. The emergency contact form and agreement for Child #3 were not reviewed at least once in a 6-month period. Child #3's emergency contact and agreement were signed on 12/18/24 with a review on 8/25/25.
Show 38 older citations
The file of Staff #2 lacked documentation of application for the State Criminal History Check and Child Abuse and Neglect Registry Check from the State(s) in which Staff #2 resided in the last 5 years prior to providing initial service in a child care setting (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #2 did not contain a State Criminal History Check and Child Abuse and Neglect Registry Check from the State(s) in which Staff #2 resided. The file of Staff #3 lacked a dated disclosure statement
At approximately 12:30 PM on 11/6/24 Certification Staff observed 3 preschoolers lying on rest equipment behind bookcases in Room 101 which did not allow for critical oversight in which the supervisors could see, hear, direct, and assess the activity of the supervisees.
On 11/6/24 observed a first-aid kit on the floor behind the teacher's desk in Room 101 which was accessible to children.
On 11/6/24 observed rust on the railing leading from Room 102 to the outdoor play space.
On 11/6/24 observed 2 urinals in the boys' bathroom located by the cafeteria that lacked handwashing signs. On 11/6/24 observed 3 stalls in the girls' bathroom located by the cafeteria that lacked handwashing signs. On 11/6/24 observed 4 sinks outside of the boys' and girls' bathrooms by the cafeteria that lacked handwashing signs.
On 11/6/24 observed a cracked red square Magna Tile with an exposed magnet in Room 102. On 11/6/24 observed a frayed dog/letter D carpet square in Room 102.
On 11/6/24 observed 2 thermometers in the refrigerator located in Room 102. The one thermometer indicated the temperature was 46 degrees, and the other thermometer indicated the temperature was 50 degrees.
Child #2, a 4-year-old, lacked Hepatitis B, DTAP/DTP/TD, Pneumococcal, MMR, Varicella, and Hepatitis A immunizations according to the recommendations of the ACIP. Child #2 had documentation of 2 Hepatitis B immunizations, 3 DTAP/DTP/TD immunizations, 1 Pneumococcal immunization, no MMR immunizations, no Varicella immunizations, and no Hepatitis A immunizations. The file of Child #2 contained a standardized form titled "Pennsylvania Code §23.84 Exemption from Immunization" instead of an exemption letter from the parent.
The facility was able to provide written documentation that the fire detection system was tested annually by a fire safety professional. The facility provided documentation that the fire detection system was inspected by a fire safety professional on 8/2/23 and 8/5/24. The inspection report dated 8/5/24 indicated 10 deficiencies, and the facility was unable to provide documentation that the system had been repaired and passed with a follow-up inspection.
The facility did not have a policy that addressed the recognition of potential signs and symptom of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma, strategies for coping with a crying, fussing, or distraught child, and the prevention and identification of child maltreatment.
The file of Staff #1 lacked a written evaluation on a regular basis, a minimum of one evaluation every 12 months (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 contained a written evaluation dated 9/9/24 with a previous one dated 7/31/23.
The agreement for Child #1 did not specify the date of the child's admission. The agreement for Child #4 did not specify the date of the child's admission.
Emergency contact information for Child #2 did not include the complete work address of the enrolling parent.
On 11/6/24 a written plan identifying the means of transporting a child to emergency care and staffing provisions in the event of an emergency was not displayed conspicuously in Room 101 and Room 102.
The emergency contact and agreement for Child #3 were not reviewed and updated at least once in a 6-month period. Child #3's emergency contact and agreement were signed on 1/23/24 and reviewed on 8/15/24.
On 11/6/24 the facility's current certificate of compliance was not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents. The certificate posted was in effect from 2/3/23 until 2/3/24.
The files of children #1 and #2 lacked emergency contact forms with the address of the child's physician or source of medical care.
The file of child #2 lacked an emergency contact form with the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
At the time of the inspection, there was no documentation of the emergency plan sent to the local municipality.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 11/22/21. The file of Child #1 lacked the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released on the agreement.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 11/11/21. The files of Children #2 and #3 lacked the date of the child's admission on the agreement.
Staff #1 lacked a copy of the National Sex Offender Registry Verification Certificate prior to providing initial service in a child care setting. Staff #1, with a start date of 9/13/21, had a NSOR dated 9/14/21.
On 11/22/21 observed Pure Silk Shaving Cream which indicated "keep out of the reach of children" in the bottom right drawer of the teacher's desk in the Preschool Classroom which was accessible to children.
On 11/22/21observed a first-aid kit located in a bag hanging on the pencil sharpener at the exit door to the outside in the Pre K Classroom which was accessible to children.
On 11/22/21 the last stall on the left side of the girls' bathroom lacked a handwashing sign.
Child #5, a 5 year old, lacked DTAP/DTP/TD, HIB, Pneumococcal, and Hepatitis A immunizations in accordance with the schedule recommended by the ACIP. Child #5 had documentation of 3 DTAP/DTP/TD immunizations, 1 HIB immunization, 1 Pneumococcal immunization, and 1 Hepatitis A immunization.
On 11/22/21 observed medication for Child #4 located in the bag with the first aid kit hanging on the pencil sharpener by the exit door to the outside in the Pre K Classroom which was accessible to children.
On 11/22/21 observed the operator did not establish a medication log for Child #6.
The facility was unable to provide proof of purchase of the interconnected fire detection system.
The file of Child #4 lacked an agreement signed by the operator.
The file of Child #4 lacked the fee to be charged per day or per week on the agreement.
The file of Child #1 lacked the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released on the agreement.
The files of Children #2 and #4 lacked the date of the child's admission on the agreement.
The file of Child #5 lacked the telephone number of the child's physician or source of medical care on the emergency contact form.
The files of Children #2 and #3 lacked the complete home address of the enrolling parent on the emergency contact form.
The file of Child #3 lacked signed parental consent for emergency medical care prior to admission. Child #3 had an admission date of 9/13/21 with an emergency contact form signed 9/14/21.
The file of Child #3 lacked the complete address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released on the emergency contact form.
The file of Child #3 lacked signed parental consent for administration of minor first-aid by facility staff prior to admission on the emergency contact form. Child #3 had an admission date of 9/13/21 with an emergency contact form signed 9/14/21.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $25.20 | $25.20 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has The Learning Lamp at Portage had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 4 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Nov 3, 2025 (background checks): “The file of Staff #2 lacked the results of the National Sex Offender Registry Certificate prior to or on the date Staff #2 began working in a child care position (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #2 contained a…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about The Learning Lamp at Portage?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at The Learning Lamp at Portage since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is The Learning Lamp at Portage’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 3, effective Mar 12, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does The Learning Lamp at Portage compare with other daycares in Cambria County?
It is #16 of 38 centers in Cambria County by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 71% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was The Learning Lamp at Portage last inspected?
Jan 7, 2026 (unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does The Learning Lamp at Portage cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $25.20 for preschool in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs The Learning Lamp at Portage?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is The Learning Lamp.
Certified centers nearby
376 Wood St, Lilly · 3.2 mi away · 51 spots More citations than most The Learning Lamp B/A School Program Forest Hills
547 Locust Street, Sidman · 6.0 mi away More citations than most Mac Learning Center
5 College Dr, Cresson · 6.1 mi away · 33 spots Among the most cited Childrens Express INC
417 Laurel Ave, Cresson · 6.7 mi away · 160 spots More citations than most Little Red School House
400 Powell Ave, Cresson · 6.9 mi away · 52 spots Among the most cited Start Smart Learning Center Sankertown
421 Maple Ave, Cresson · 7.2 mi away · 101 spots More citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.