The Learning Village II
The Learning Village II is a certified child care center in Mars, PA, with capacity for 151 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times and confirmed violations in 3 complaint investigations. The state cited 74 violations, 11 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). 18 citations came in the last 12 months, including 3 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #5 of 8 centers in Mars and has more citations per inspection than 89% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The NSOR clearance on file for Facility Person #3 was completed after their start date in a child care position.
The most recent emergency plan review/update was documented as completed on 7/9/25, more than 12 months prior.
There was a small area of damaged plaster on the wall in the restroom in the K-Prep room under the toilet paper holder.
The TB test results on file for Facility Person #2 were completed more than 12 months prior to their start date in child care.
The health assessment on file for Facility Person #1 indicated they had a communicable disease, but did not provide further details.
Facility Persons #4 and #5 were classified as group supervisors. There was insufficient documentation of the education required for the classification on file for Facility Persons #4 and #5.
Based on interviews, it was determined that Staff Person #1 grabbed a child's arm, in a jerking motion and pulled the child toward him/her and Staff Person #1 grabbed a child by both arms and forcefully pushed the child backwards.
The current emergency plan training documented and on file for Facility Person #6 was completed more than 12 months after the previously documented emergency plan training.
There was a cleaner in a spray bottle on top of the refrigerator in the KPrep Room, next to a container of a food item.
There was peeling paint/damaged plaster in the following locations: in Preschool 1 on the wall in the corner near where the cots are stored, in the Schoolage room on a wall near the restroom, and in the Transition room on the wall behind the high chairs.
The current health assessment on file for child #1 was completed more than 12 months after the previous health assessment on file.
In the Older Toddler room, diaper changing records for 11/3/25 were reviewed. Records indicated that several children were diapered at 11:30 AM and then again at 2:30 PM. Staff stated that the children's diapers were not checked or changed in between these times as they had a snack after naptime and were checked/changed after their snack time.
The health assessment on file for Facility Person #2 did not include an examination for communicable diseases and the results of that examination.
The current firesafety training documented and on file for Facility Person #3 was completed more than 12 months after the previously documented firesafety training.
The current staff evaluations completed and on file for Facility Persons #4 and #5 were completed more than 12 months after the previously completed evaluations.
The daily activity schedule was not posted in the Infant Room.
The emergency contact form on file for child #2 did not include the addresses for all release persons.
According to statements from staff, staff persons have been observed not supervising children appropriately while in the outdoor playspace. Staff state they have observed other staff on their phones or standing in a group talking to each other, rather than paying attention to the children. Staff also state that at times they have seen children on the playground unable to be seen by the staff supervising them, as the only staff with the group is either in a seated stationary position or standing near the fence talking to others on the other side of the fence, and there is equipment blocking the view of a portion of the playground.
Show 56 older citations
Based on interviews it was determined that Staff Person #1 used harsh, demeaning or abusive language in the presence of children.
During the complaint investigation and while reviewing staff files, it was determined that Staff Person #2, who resided in New York State within the past five (5) years, lacked the required out-of-state clearances.
Staff Person #1 completed Pediatric First Aid/Pediatric CPR training; however, the First Aid/CPR card did not include the word "Pediatric" in the "Optional Modules Completed" section of the card. (See LIS Code Sheet)
During a complaint investigation, and based on staff interviews, it was determined that in the Young Toddler Room, the childcare facility did not provide daily activities that promoted the development of skills, social competence, and self-esteem for a younger toddler.
According to staff statements, there are occasions when children are dropped off at the center by parents in the morning, and the additional child or children put the particular group out of ratio when the parents leave the classroom. The group remains out of a ratio for a few minutes while classroom staff alert center administration and until staffing is adjusted.
The child abuse clearance on file for Facility Person #4 dated after their start date in a child care position.
The facility's emergency plan did not include a plan for continuity of operations in the event of an emergency.
The letter to the parents explaining the emergency plan did not include information regarding the facility's plan for a lockdown or accommodations in the event of an emergency.
There were uncovered outlets on a power strip on the floor in the schoolage room.
There were two unlocked drawers of sunscreen, in reach of children, in the schoolage room. There were sunscreens in the drawers labeled, "keep out of reach of children."
There was a bottle of a cleaner in the older toddler room not labeled with the contents.
There was a child's medication (Claritin) kept in the office that was not in the original container.
The current health assessments on file for Facility Persons #1 and #3 were each completed more than 24 months after the previous health assessment on file for the facility person.
The program's emergency plan did not provide for accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions.
The files for Facility Persons #2, #5 and #6 did not include documentation of either the required education and/or child care experience to serve as their indicated staff classifications.
The file for Staff person #3 includes an incomplete criminal history clearance that did not include a dissemination date, (See LIS Code Sheet), making it invalid.
The NSOR on file for Staff person #4, who is a volunteer, was applied for on 7/24/23, after the first day with children; Volunteers may not be provisional hires (See LIS Code sheet). The completed NSOR is dated 10/12/23.
There was no handwashing sign at the sink in the girl's bathroom in the School-age room.
There were googly eyes measuring smaller than 1 inch in size, reportedly used for craft projects, in the 1-yr old classroom.
There were approximately 3-4 children in the PreK 2room who did not have rest equipment, but laid on an area rug during quiet time.
There was no thermometer in the refrigerator in the School-age room, where children's lunches are stored.
The two most recent health assessments on file for Child #1, who is a preschool age child, are dated 7/27/22 and 8/17/23, more than 12 months apart. The two most recent health assessments on file for Child #2, who is a preschool age child, are dated 8/31/22 and 9/13/23, more than 12 months apart.
The health assessment on file for Staff person #2 does not include the physician or health care professional's assessment of the person's suitability to provide child care.
The fire alarm 30-day test log includes test dates 8/27/23-9/27/23, more than 30 days apart.
Staff person #1 did not complete the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Get Started with Center-based Care: Building Blocks for Quality; the training was completed on 10/22/23.
The emergency contact form on file for Child #1 does not include the telephone number for the child's pediatrician or source of medical care.
There was a child who was observed receiving care in the Transition classroom without their emergency contact form being in the classroom.
The file for staff person #2 does not include documentation of application of a Maryland child abuse clearance or Maryland Sex Offender registry search prior to date of hire (See IS CODE SHEET) required for provisional hiring under the CPSL. The file for staff person #3 does not include documentation of application of a Minnesota child abuse clearance or Minnesota Sex Offender registry search prior to date of hire (See IS CODE SHEET) required for provisional hiring under the CPSL.
The emergency plan on site does not include provisions regarding volunteer emergency preparedness training, and continuity of operations, required as of 7/1/22, as per Announcement C-22-04.
There was shaving cream, labeled "Keep out of the reach of children", used for arts and crafts projects, in the Preschool classroom.
The first aid kit in the Infant (formerly School-age) room did not include gloves.
There was an uncovered fence bolt on the gate leading from the toddler playground to the preschool playground, which creates a potential hazard for a child.
Peeling paint was observed in the Older Toddler room by the bookshelf, which was accessible to children.
The most recent health assessment on file for Child #2, who is an Infant, is dated 3/23/22, more than 6 months ago.
The most recent influenza vaccination on file for Child #5, who is 4 years old, is dated 1/27/20, is dated more than 1 year ago, and is recommended annually by the ACIP.
While in the Older Toddler room, children were observed being fed their lunches without washing their hands prior to eating.
The initial health assessment on file for Staff person #4 is not valid, as Questions #1, #2, and #3 were not answered by the examining health care professional.
The initial health assessment on file for Staff person #1 does not indicate that the staff person was examined for communicable/contagious disease. (See LIS Code Sheet).
There were 3 infant feeding bottles observed in the Infant room that were not labeled with the child's name for whom the bottles were intended.
The 30 day test log for the fire detection system includes tests date 1/8/22 and 2/16/22, more than 30 days apart.
Staff person #3 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet):Pediatric First Aid/Pediatric CPR.
The emergency contact form on file for Child #1, #2, #3, and #4 does not include information on the child's special needs, as specified by the child's parent, physician, physician's assistant or CRNP, which is needed in an emergency situation.
The emergency contact form on file for Child #2 does not include a complete address for all listed release persons.
There was a child observed receiving care in the Preschool without their emergency contact form being in the classroom.
The file for staff person #3, hired provisionally with a start date of 11-9-21, lacked the out of state Criminal History check or application for the Criminal History check at their start date and requires a current out of state Criminal History check.
On the outdoor toddler play space on the ledge near the door to the facility, there was a screwdriver that had sharp edges and was accessible to children.
In the 2 year old room, there was peeling paint in multiple areas towards the corner and along the yellow wall near the cots. In the preschool room, there was peeling paint in one area on the left wall above the cots. In the pre-k room, there was peeling paint on the green wall in one area near the cots, on the back wall in multiple areas, and near the middle corner area in multiple areas.
On the preschool/pre-k play space, there were covers on both of the benches of the picnic table that had tears in multiple areas.
The file for child #3, with a start date of 8-19-21, lacked an immunization record within 60 days of their start date and requires a current immunization record.
The files for child #2, with a start date of 3-29-21, and child #3, with a start date of 8-19-21, lacked an initial health assessment within 90 days of their start date and require a current health assessment. (The suspended regulation requires the parent to provide an initial health assessment no later than 90 days following the first day of attendance at the facility.)
The file for staff person #2 lacked current fire safety training completed within the last year.
The file for staff person #1, with a start date of 1-18-21, lacked pediatric first-aid and CPR training within 90 days of their start date and requires current training.
The file for child #4 had an agreement that lacked the fee amount.
The file for child #4 had an agreement that lacked the child's arrival and departure times.
The file for child #1 had an emergency contact form that lacked the address and telephone number of the child's physician.
The file for child #5 had an emergency contact form that lacked the name of the health insurance and the policy number.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $77.00 | $77.00 |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $77.00 | $77.00 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $76.00 | $76.00 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $75.00 | $75.00 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $68.00 | $68.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $56.00 | $39.60 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has The Learning Village II had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 11 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Aug 18, 2026 (background checks): “The NSOR clearance on file for Facility Person #3 was completed after their start date in a child care position.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about The Learning Village II?
Pennsylvania lists 3 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is The Learning Village II’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Apr 23, 2021. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does The Learning Village II compare with other daycares in Mars?
It is #5 of 8 centers in Mars by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 89% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was The Learning Village II last inspected?
Aug 18, 2026 (allocated unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does The Learning Village II cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $77.00 for newborn, $77.00 for infant, $76.00 for young toddler, $75.00 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs The Learning Village II?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is The Learning Village Early Childhood Dev Ctr LLC.
Certified centers nearby
212 Hook St, Mars · 0.5 mi away · 82 spots More citations than most Little Appleseed Learning Center
341 Mars Valencia Rd, Mars · 0.5 mi away · 86 spots Among the most cited The Goddard School
1000 Winston Way, Valencia · 1.2 mi away · 173 spots About typical Doodle Bugs Childrens Learning Academy
230 Scharberry Ln, Mars · 2.0 mi away · 164 spots Among the most cited Little Appleseed Learning Center
615 Warrendale Rd, Gibsonia · 2.1 mi away · 70 spots More citations than most Little House Learning CTR
7021 Crider Rd, Mars · 2.2 mi away · 158 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.