YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary
YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary is a certified child care center in Pittsburgh, PA. It holds a Keystone STAR 2 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times. The state cited 36 violations, 10 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for health & medication (11 of 36). 7 citations came in the last 12 months, including 2 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #61 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh and has more citations per inspection than 58% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
On July 16, 2026, Staff Person #1 was observed to be participating in swimming activity and responsible for 5 school age children. The facility was unable to provide verification that Staff Person #1 had received water safety instruction from a certified lifeguard prior to participation and being assigned responsibility for children engaged in swimming activity.
SECOND CITATION. An emergency contact form was not present for child #1, a school age child, participating in swimming activity at the time of the inspection. FACILITY PREVIOUSLY CITED ON 7.2.26.
Staff Person #1 and #2 were observed to be caring for 24 school age children at the park across from the swimming pool. Staff Person #1 identified being responsible for 12 school age children and used identification tags to show their group. Using the tags, Staff Person #1 reported that they did not know who the one child was from the group. They also identified another child as someone who was later identified by Staff Person #2 as one of their children. It was confirmed that the child they both identified was actually in Staff Person #2's group which meant that Staff Person #1 had not identified one of their children.
The facility was scheduled to participate in swimming from 1pm-2:30pm. At approximately 2pm, another YMCA program was observed to arrive at the swimming pool. It was reported that Staff Person #3, the designated lifeguard for the facility, would also be the designated lifeguard to the other YMCA facility at the same time. Each location is required to have their own assigned lifeguard during swimming activity.
Sunscreens, labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children, were observed in the grassy area at the park area across from street from the pool where school age children were waiting for their turn to swim. The sunscreens were accessible to the children.
Emergency contact forms were not present in the pool area where 12 school age children were receiving care. The emergency contact forms were with a separate group of 24 school age children at the park across the street from the pool area. The emergency contact forms were then brought to the pool area with the second group of school agers who went to swim, which resulted in school age children being at the park without emergency contact forms present.
Five spray bottles containing a disinfectant cleaning solution and one bottle of Super Sorb instant absorber were observed on a table accessible to children receiving care in the child care space. The cleaning materials were all labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children. Announcement C-24-02 requires cleaning and other toxic materials shall be kept in an area or container that is locked or made inaccessible to children.
The current health report on file for Staff Person #1 lacked information related to an examination for communicable disease.
While participating in swimming activity, Staff Person #1 identified being responsible for a group that included 7 young school agers. The Staff:Child ratio while young school age children are swimming is 1:6.
The files for Children #1 and #2 lacked an initial health assessment within 60 days of their enrollment at the facility.
Show 27 older citations
The file for Staff Person #1 lacked 12 hours of child care training in their assessed training year of October 2023 and October 2024.
An EpiPen was observed in an unlocked backpack on the ground in the outdoor play space where the children were playing. The backpack was accessible to children receiving care in the space.
Lunchboxes containing potentially hazardous food were observed in many of the lunch boxes being maintained in the individual hallway lockers. These potentially hazardous foods included several Lunchables, meats and cheeses, yogurt cups and tubes, and left over meals from home to include pasta and pizza.
The disclosure statement in the file for person #2 was from previous employment in the legal entity's unlicensed summer camp.
The most recent emergency drill documented at the facility was dated 11/1/23. Documentation of the previous emergency drill could not be located, so timeliness could not be assessed.
The file for staff person #3, who had worked with children more than 90 days, did not include first-aid/CPR training.
The file for staff person #1 included a foreign degree that had not been translated by an acceptable agency, so the level of education could not be determined.
There were two excursion bags observed lying near the fence in the grassy area of the pool, making them accessible to children. The bags contained several medications, including inhalers and epi-pens.
At approximately 1:30 pm, staff person #5 was observed in the pool 6 children. At approximately 2 pm, staff person #5, was observed walking from the pool to the grassy area with 4 children. It was determined that 2 of the children had run off and staff person #5 did not know where they were, for approximately 2-3 minutes. Staff person #5 was heard telling the two children that they scared them because the staff person did not know where they were. Based on conversation with staff, staff person #6 spotted the 2 children near the mushroom fountain, which is at the other end of the grassy area, and sent them back over to join staff person #5.
At approximately 1:30 pm, staff person #5 was observed in the pool 6 children. At approximately 2 pm, staff person #5, was observed walking from the pool to the grassy area with 4 children. It was determined that 2 of the children had run off and staff person #5 did not know where they were, for approximately 2-3 minutes. Staff person #5 was heard telling the two children that they scared them because the staff person did not know where they were. Based on conversation with staff, staff person #6 spotted the 2 children near the mushroom fountain, which is at the other end of the grassy area, and sent them back over to join staff person #5.
At approximately 1:30 pm, upon entering Highland Park swimming pool, staff person #1 was observed standing near the edge of the pool, speaking to staff person #2, the lifeguard. At the same time, staff persons #3 and #4 were observed with 29 school-age children in the grassy area near the fence on the parking lot side of the pool, a combination of 20 young school-agers and 9 older school-agers. After a brief conversation with staff person #2, staff person #1 joined the staff and children in the grassy area. All three staff were wearing supervision ID tags with the children's names. When asked to identify their groups, staff person #1 identified 6 children, staff person #3 identified 10 children and staff person #4 identified 12 children, leaving one child not identified by anyone. As each staff person was asked to identify their groups, the names of the children they identified were read back to them to confirm the names and number of children in their group. Staff were then told that there was a child who hadn't been identified by anyone. The names of children in each staff person's group were reviewed with them a second time, again, to confirm names and number of children in…
At approximately 1:30 p m, upon entering Highland Park swimming pool, it was observed that there were 2 staff in the pool with 12 children and 3 staff in the grassy area with 29 children, for a total of 41 children, a combination of 32 young schoolagers and 9 schoolagers.Because the children and staff were all within the boundaries of the pool area, they could not maintain swim ratios. They would need at least 7 staff to maintain proper swim ratios.
Staff person #2, the lifeguard who was on duty for this facility, was also the acting lifeguard for a separate facility at the pool, under the same legal entity.
There were two excursion bags observed lying near the fence in the grassy area of the pool, making them accessible to children. The bags contained hand sanitizer, which included instructions to keep out of the reach of children.
There was an unlabeled epi-pen in one of the excursion bags at the pool. Based on conversation with staff, it belonged to child #1.
There were two excursion bags observed lying near the fence in the grassy area of the pool, making them accessible to children. The bags contained several medications, including inhalers and epi-pens.
The epi-pen for child #1 expired in June 2023
On 7/5/23, the following medications were observed in the excursion bags at the pool: There was a medication log on site for the epi-pen for child #1, but it was not signed and dated by a parent. There was no medication log/parental consent on site for the inhaler for child #2 and #3. There was a med log and a care plan on site for the epi-pen for child #4, but neither documents were signed and dated by a parent. On 7/6/23, when photos of the medication logs were texted to this certification representative, the logs were signed by a parent, but the dates appeared altered. The original date on the log for child #1 appeared to be 7/6/23, but the number "3" was written over top of the number "6," making the date 7/3/23. The original date on the log for child #2 appeared to be 7/6/23, but the number "5" was written over the top of the number "6," changing the date to 7/5/23. The original date on the log for child #3 appeared to be 7/6/23, but the entire date was scratched out and "6/26/23" was written above it. The log and care plan texted to this rep for child #4 still did not include a parent signature.
The 2nd box on the health report for child #1 was not checked and there was no information from the physician regarding the child's current medications and the reasons for the medications.
The title of the individual who signed the health report in the file for child #1 was listed as "chiropractor."
The health report in the file for child #2 did not include an assessment of an acute or chronic health problem or special need and recommendations for treatment or services, including information regarding abnormal results of screening tests for vision, hearing or lead poisoning.
The last two fire safety trainings in the file for staff person #1, #3, #4 and #5 were dated more than 12 months apart.
The only acceptable FA/CPR training in the file for staff person # 2. employed before 4/29/22 and beyond their first 90 days working with children was dated 11/7/22. The file for staff person #3. #4 and #5, all hired before 4/29/22 and beyond their first 90 days working with children, was dated 6/9/22.
The emergency contact information in the file for child #1 did not include the child's date of birth.
The emergnecy contact information in the file for child #1 did not include addresses for 5 of the 6 release persons.
At approximately 4:40 PM on 11/16/21, Facility Person #1 left the classroom where she and Facility Person #2 were supervising 16 young schoolagers and one older schoolager to walk down the hall and answer the door, leaving Facility Person #2 the only staff person in classroom supervising the 17 schoolagers.
The emergency contact form on file for child #1 did not include all release persons listed on the agreement or the addresses of the three release persons listed.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $59.80 | $32.20 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $59.80 | $32.20 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 10 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jul 2, 2026 (supervision): “Staff Person #1 and #2 were observed to be caring for 24 school age children at the park across from the swimming pool. Staff Person #1 identified being responsible for 12 school age children and used identification…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 2, effective Mar 19, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary compare with other daycares in Pittsburgh?
It is tied for #61 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 58% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary last inspected?
Nov 20, 2025 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $59.80 for young school-age, $59.80 for older school-age in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs YMCA of Greater PGH/Ohara Elementary?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh.
Certified centers nearby
1220 Powers Run Rd, Pittsburgh · 0.4 mi away · 159 spots More citations than most ST Thomas Kids Daycare Preschool INC
378 Delaware Ave, Oakmont · 1.2 mi away · 53 spots More citations than most Riverview Childrens Center
655 Sylvan Way, Verona · 1.3 mi away · 167 spots More citations than most Riverstone Academy
250 Freeport Rd, Pittsburgh · 1.7 mi away · 115 spots Among the most cited YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh Tenth ST Elementary
701 10th St, Oakmont · 1.7 mi away About typical The Leo Academy for Early Education
237 6th St, Pittsburgh · 1.8 mi away · 81 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.