Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool · Preschool, Ontario
Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool is a licensed child care center in Ontario, CA, licensed for up to 83 children and serving preschool-age children. It has held its California license since 2023. Since February 2021, state licensing staff have inspected it twice and investigated 4 complaints, 1 of them substantiated. The state issued 31 citations, 9 of them Type A (the most serious), most often for building & playground safety (11 of 31). 12 citations came in the last 12 months, including 3 Type A. Measured by weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #37 of 38 centers in Ontario and has more citations per inspection than 99% of California licensed centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The playground behind the fence to the right, aka "tumblers playground" 1 The facility representative submitted a written statement stating that the "tumblers playground" will be closed until remediation has been done. Facility representative agrees to submit proof of purchase order immediately, and submit proof of remediation. Failure to do so will is not properly filled with rubber bits. This was previously cited as a Type A citation, but due to the facilty representative closing the "tumblers playground", it is not longer an immediate threat to the health and safety of children. However, this is a potential risk to the health and safety of children in care. 8 result in repeat citations and may accrue civil penalties.
During a tour of the outdoor area, LPA observed a large hole in the 1 Facility representative agrees to submit a plan for the outdoor playgrounds. (1)Fill the hole with something, to prevent the tripping hazard. (2)Fix the latch on the gate to prevent access to the side yard, and (3)refill rubber in the Tumblers playground. Proof is due to the department no later than the
During the tour to the tumblers class, LPA counted 9 children present with 2 staff. As LPA continued the tour, there was a child in the restroom left without any supervision. The 2 staff were tending to other children, with no visual supervision on the child in the 8 restroom. This poses an immediate health, safety/personal rights risk to persons in care. A CIVIL PENALTY IS BEING ASSESSED.
Currently, there is no site director appointed to this site. This poses a potential risk to he health/safety to children in care. 1 Facility representative agrees to either submit a directors packet for a fully qualified director, or to submit a request for a waiver, no later than the
During the tour, LPA observed 2 gates to a hallway between 1 Facility representative is asked to make these items inaccessible and store behind a key lock. Proof of this is due to the department no later than the
(g) All personnel, including the licensee, administrator & volunteers, shall be in good health and be physically& mentally capable of performing assigned tasks. (2) Each person specified in (g) above shall have a health-screening report signed by the person Facility representative agrees to submit an LIC503 for S4 no later than the
(a) Prior to/ w/in 30 calendar days following enrollment of a child, licensee shall obtain a written medical assessment of child. This enables licensee to assess whether the center can provide necessary health related services to the child. A 3rd review of C5's file still does not have the above on file. 1 Facility representative agrees to obtain a written medical assessment for C5 and place in their file. This is due to the department no later than the
The previous individual appointed as the site director did not qualify. Currently, there is no site director appointed to this site. This poses a potential risk to he health/safety to children in care. 1 Facility representative agrees to submit a directors packet for a fully qualified director to the department no later than the
LPA observed a large banner at the front of the center, advertising care. However, no facility number was observed to be on the banner. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.
The facility agrees to submit all pending items for the current appointed director, or submit a full packet for any other current or new staff who could qualify as a fully qualified site director. A civil penalty of $250 has been assessed. This is due to licensing no later than the
Based on a 2nd record reveiw for S1 and S4, S4 is still missing health screening. This poses a potential health/safety risk to persons in care 1 The facility representative stated that S4 shared that a health screening has been scheduled. A civil penalty of $250 has been assessed. Facility representative agrees to submit proof of LIC503 or similar for S4 to the department, no later than the
(a) Prior to/ w/in 30 calendar days following enrollment of a child, licensee shall obtain a written medical assessment of child. This enables licensee to assess whether the center can provide necessary health-related services to the child. A second review of C5's file still does not have the above on file. 1 Facility representative agrees to obtain a written medical assessment for C5 and place in their file. This is due to the department no later than the
Show 19 older citations
During a tour of the center, LPA noted the following items in an unlocked cabinet, accessible on the most bottom shelf: 1 bag of "Pure Epsom Salt", 1 bag of "Epsom Salt", 8fl Oz bottle of Tide detergent, 2 cans of shaving cream, and 1 64 fl Oz bottle of "Sta-Flo, concentrated liquid starch". This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
During the tour, LPA observed the trash can without a lid having food waste in it. A child was observed with their hand in the trash can. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
During a tour of the outdoor area, LPA observed a large hole in the ground where a tree used to be. This hole is approximately 3'8" in width in size, and approximately 1 foot deep, if not a little more. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Several(5-10) children in the "cheerioes" classroom were observed running into the restroom by themselves, throughout the day. Staff were indicating to the children to let them know when they're done. Furthermore, during transition from the outdoor area to indoor area, there were approximately 3-7 children indoors, and staff had their back to them until one of the children started to cry. This poses an immediate health, safety/personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on directors own admission, the facility did not have any documentation of disaster drills available for review. Director also stated that she recalls the disaster drills being done sometime in January, but have not done any since then. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
During the facility tour, LPA observed 3 containers of disinfecting wipes, and an unlabeled cleaning spray. These were stored in a cabinet with the door closed, but not locked. The shelf they were on was low enough for daycare children to access. Director understands the difference between having 1 item in an inaccessible area for use, vs 'storing' multiple containers, not behind a key lock. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on observation during the tour, LPA noted that none of the plastic play structures outdoors were bolted or weighed down. LPA was able to move them by pushing them with not much force. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. 1 out of 4 staff (S1) files did not have their Mandated Reporter Training (MRT) for "Child Care Providers" certificate updated. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on record review, 2 out of 4 staff (S1 and S4) did not have a health-screening report (OR LIC503) on file for review during this inspection. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on record reveiw,1 out of 4 staff were not on the facility roster. However, their fingerprints have been cleared, they were just never transferred and associated to this facility. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on record review, 1 out of 6 children (C5) did not have a written medical assessment of the child on file. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
During a previous visit, LPA discovered there was a change in director for the center. This change had taken place well over the 10 days allotted, and was never communicated to LPA. LPA had requested the new appointed director submit a directors packet, which has still not been received. LPA reviewed what was available, and left the center with a list of missing items. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
staff present did not show up on the facility roster. S1 and S2.
Facility representative agrees to submit a fully completed directors packet to the department, no later than the
Facility representatives agrees to submit proof of records or a list of records for S3 and S4, no later than
Based on [(observation) and (interview), the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed no operable carbon monoxide detector for preschool program which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed dirt and debris on toilets, sinks, tables, trash cans, door/walls; detached wall siding with peeling paint, dirty carts holding water bottles, air filters with layered dirt/debris, exposed ceiling tile, in operable sinks/ one toilet and ceiling water stains which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that there was no LIC503 for S4 on file which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living including eating, sleeping or toileting; or withholding of shelter, clothing, medication or aids to physical functioning. Director agrees to speak with Child N.1's parents/legal guardian to assess situation and make a decision by 05/18/23. Director will provided plan of correction in writing by deadline to CCL. Technical Support Program/CCL (TSP) has been reached and Director will follow up with TSP/ LPA to receive Training on Personal Rights and Children with Challenging Behavior. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Per interviews conducted at the facility with staff and children in care, LPA was able to confirm that Child N.1 was spitting (saliva and phlegm) to children and staff in their faces, neck and arms due to health concerns, It was decided by staff to cover child's mouth with a mask to prevent child from spreading germs.…
Complaint investigations
Staff used an inappropriate form of discipline with day care child while in care.
How often are complaints about daycares in San Bernardino County substantiated? See the county-by-county report →
About this center
Other licenses at this address
Common questions
Does Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool take infants?
Not under this license, which covers preschool-age children. An infant center is licensed separately at the same address (listed below).
Has Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool had any serious violations?
California issued 9 Type A citations since 2021, its most serious category. The most recent was on Jun 11, 2026, for outdoor activity space. Each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool?
California investigated 4 complaints since 2021 and substantiated 1. Allegations are shown only for substantiated complaints.
How does Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool compare with other daycares in Ontario?
It is tied for #37 of 38 centers in Ontario by weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 99% of California licensed centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool last inspected?
Sep 18, 2025. The state issued at least one citation during that visit.
How much does Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool cost?
California does not publish individual centers’ prices, so ask Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool for its current tuition. For comparison, the median full-time price at licensed centers in San Bernardino County, which includes Ontario, was $835 a month for preschoolers (about $1,050 today) in the state’s 2021 Regional Market Rate Survey.
Who runs Lil' Blue Heartwood Preschool?
The licensee is Lil Blue Heartwood Preschool, and the administrator listed with the state is Na.
Licensed centers nearby
2460 S Euclid Ave, Ontario · under 0.1 mi away · 16 spots Among the most cited KinderCare Learning Center
2140 South Euclid Avenue, Ontario · 0.4 mi away · 24 spots Among the most cited KinderCare Learning Center
2140 S Euclid Ave, Ontario · 0.4 mi away · 96 spots Among the most cited KinderCare Learning Center
2140 South Euclid Avenue, Ontario · 0.4 mi away · 28 spots Among the most cited Ontario Christian Preschool/Day Care
1907 South Euclid Avenue, Ontario · 0.7 mi away · 150 spots More citations than most Omsd/Sultana Elementary School
1845 South Sultana Avenue, Ontario · 0.8 mi away · 24 spots No citations
Citations are quoted from California Department of Social Services inspection and complaint reports. Type A citations are the state’s most serious category (an immediate risk to children’s health, safety or personal rights); Type B citations are a potential risk. A citation is a finding about one rule, not a judgment about a center overall. Complaint allegations appear here only when the state substantiated them.
To read the full state reports, search facility number 364846289 on the California Care Facility Search. Data refreshed Oct 3, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.