Cassies Cradle
Cassies Cradle is a certified child care center in Homestead, PA, with capacity for 39 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 9 times and confirmed violations in 3 complaint investigations. The state cited 77 violations, 16 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for building & playground safety (19 of 77). 19 citations came in the last 12 months, including 3 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #8 of 9 centers in Homestead and has more citations per inspection than 87% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The file(s) for Staff Person(s) #2, #3 and #4 contained NSOR Certificates that were dated more than 60 months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file(s) for Staff Person(s) #4 contained PA State Police and Child Abuse Clearances and an NSOR Certificate that were dated more than 60 months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Updated Child Health Assessment for Children #1 (OT) lacked in the child file. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The two most recent health assessments for Staff #2 and #4 were dated more than 24 months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Initial Health Assessment for Staff #1 was dated (01.16.2025) which is past their Date of Hire. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The initial health assessment on file for Staff Person #1 includes tuberculosis screening. Additionally, the TB test on record is not from another childcare setting and is not dated within 12 months prior to employment. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The initial health assessment on file for Staff Person #5 includes tuberculosis screening; however, the TB Test is not from another childcare setting. Therefore, the TB Test on record is not valid for this facility.
The two most recent Pediatric First Aid and Pediatric CPR Trainings for staff #1 and #3 were dated more than 24 months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The last two fire safety trainings in the file for Staff #2 and #3 were dated more than one year apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Emergency Contact Form(s) for Child(ren) #2 lacked written parental "Consent for Emergency Medical Care." (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Emergency Contact Form(s) for Child(ren) #2 lacked a signature for "Consent for Minor First Aid." (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The files for Staff Persons #1 and #2 lacked a signed, dated and witnessed Disclosure Statement. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file(s) for Staff #1 lacked the FBI Clearance; therefore, Staff #1 was incorrectly provisionally hired. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file(s) for Staff #2 lacked the PA State Police clearance; therefore, Staff #1 was incorrectly provisionally hired. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The files for Staff Persons #1 and #2 lacked a signed, dated and witnessed Disclosure Statement. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file(s) for Staff #1 lacked the FBI Clearance; therefore, Staff #1 was incorrectly provisionally hired. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file(s) for Staff #2 lacked the PA State Police clearance; therefore, Staff #1 was incorrectly provisionally hired. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The landing at the top-of-the-stairs leading to the Pre-School Room, the slider window did not have an opening-restrictor; the operable section could open beyond 6 inches.
The following unsafe conditions were observed in the outdoor play space: The plastic playhouse had a crack on the blue floo leading to the slide which poses a cutting or pinch point hazard and the Saturn Ball or Pogo Ball had cracked edges around the hard plastic rim which encompasses the blue ball posed a cutting hazard. In the Preschool Room, to the left of the window air conditioner and across from the room's entrance, an electrical outlet was observed without a cover plate. The outlet was extremely loose, creating a gap between the outlet and the wall large enough for a child's finger to fit. Exposed wires were visible within the gap, posing an electrical shock hazard.
Three (3) 2'×4' ceiling tiles were stacked on the sidewalk and waterlogged in front of the side exit door at the time of inspection, obstructing safe egress and posing a tripping hazard in an emergency.
In the Young Toddler/Infant Room, under the back window a red, foam cushion was observed to be fraying and accessible to children who are still placing objects in their mouths.
In the Pre-School classroom on the second floor, a bookcase located under the front window was observed to be separating at the top right corner and along the right-side panel, creating a potential pinch point hazard.
The file(s) for Staff Person(s) #1 lacked an Initial Health Assessment. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
Staff Person(s) #1 and #2 lacked documentation of acceptable Pediatric First Aid and Pediatric CPR training completed through a PQAS Certified Instructor or PQAS approved curriculum. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The file(s) for Staff #1 and #2 lacked documentation of education and previous childcare experience, making it unable to be determined if the individual qualified as a staff person. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
Show 58 older citations
The PA State Police, Child Abuse, FBI and NSOR Clearances in the files for staff #1 were dated more than 60 months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET).
The two most recent Emergency Plan Trainings for Staff #3 were dated more than 12-months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The First Aid kit in the Infant Room on the first floor lacked sterile gauze pads.
In the basement (OT Room) the bottom of the steel door frame was rusted through which could pose a cutting or puncture hazard.
In the Toddler room, on the window ledge, which looks out to the side yard has chipping paint and plaster.
Two green, plastic chairs were obstructing the exit door from the Older Toddler Room to the outdoor play space.
The Updated Child Health Assessment for Child #3 (OT) lacked from the file. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
Mandated Reporter Training for staff #3 was dated more than 60 months ago. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Fee Agreement Form for Child File #3 lacked the "Release Person's Name." (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Emergency Contact Form for child #1 lacked the "Release Person's Name," "Release Person's Address" and "Release Person's Phone Number."
At approximately 1:00 pm, upon entrance into the building, staff #2 was observed in the doorway of the infant room and the front L-shaped room. Shortly after, staff #2, who was identified as in the infant staff since staff #3 was on break, was later standing in the doorway of the infant and toddler classrooms. Staff #2 identified 3 children in the infant room and 1 child in the toddler room in their supervisory group. However, one staff is unable to supervise and be present in 2 separate childcare spaces simultaneously. The infant sleeping in the toddler room without a staff physically present in the childcare space created a 0:1 staff to child ratio.
** At approximately 1:00 pm, staff #1 was in the front L shape room with 7 children, the oldest being 2 years and the youngest being 1 year of age. While 6 children were on their mats resting, 1 child was sitting at the table eating crackers. With a child at the table and not resting on a mat, nap ratios no longer apply. With a young toddler in the classroom, the 1:5 staff to child ratio was exceeded by 2 since 1 child was sitting at the table.
At approximately 1:00 pm, staff #1 was in the front L shape room with 7 children, the oldest being 2 years and the youngest being 1 year of age. While 6 children were on their mats resting, 1 child, was sitting at the table eating crackers. With a child at the table and not resting on a mat, nap ratios no longer apply. With a young toddler in the classroom, the 1:5 staff to child ratio was exceeded by 2 since 1 child was sitting at the table.
**At approximately 1:00 pm, upon entering the building, staff #2 was observed in the doorway of the infant room and the front L-shaped room, with their back toward the toddler room doorway. Shortly after, while standing in the doorway between the infant and toddler classrooms, staff #2, who was identified as the infant staff since staff #3 was on break, identified 3 children in the infant room and 1 child in the toddler room in their supervisory group. However, one staff is unable to be physically present in both the infant and toddler rooms and supervise children in 2 separate childcare spaces simultaneously.
At approximately 1:00 pm, upon entering the building, staff #2 was observed in the doorway of the infant room and the front L-shaped room, with their back toward the toddler room doorway. Shortly after, while standing in the doorway between the infant and toddler classrooms, staff #2, who was identified as the infant staff since staff #3 was on break, identified 3 children in the infant room and 1 child in the toddler room in their supervisory group. However, one staff is unable to be physically present in both the infant and toddler rooms and supervise children in 2 separate childcare spaces simultaneously.
***At approximately 1:00 pm, upon entering the building, staff #2 was observed in the doorway of the infant room and the front L-shaped room, with their back toward the toddler room doorway. Shortly after, while standing in the doorway between the infant and toddler classrooms, staff #2, who was identified as the infant staff since staff #3 was on break, identified 3 children in the infant room and 1 child in the toddler room in their supervisory group. However, one staff is unable to be physically present in both the infant and toddler rooms and supervise children in 2 separate childcare spaces simultaneously.
At approximately 1:00 pm, upon entering the building, staff #2 was observed in the doorway of the infant room and the front L-shaped room, with their back toward the toddler room doorway. Shortly after, while standing in the doorway between the infant and toddler classrooms, staff #2, who was identified as the infant staff since staff #3 was on break, identified 3 children in the infant room and 1 child in the toddler room in their supervisory group. However, one staff is unable to be physically present in both the infant and toddler rooms and supervise children in 2 separate childcare spaces simultaneously.
During naptime, 4 staff were on the facility premises with the napping children and one staff was on break running errands. Staff #5 identified the 6 older toddlers on their mats and 1 young toddler at the table in their primary group. Staff # 4 identified 3 infants and 1young toddler in their cribs in their primary supervisory group. Staff #3 identified 9 preschool children in their group and staff #2 identified 3 older toddlers and 3 preschool children in their supervisory groups. There were not enough staff on the premises to meet the ratio needs of the facility.
The file for Staff Person #1 (see LIS code sheet), a provisionally hired staff, lacked a request for the NSOR and a copy of the final NSOR. Additionally, Staff #1, who did not have all required clearances, was observed working alone unsupervised by a permanent employee.
The facility file lacked documentation of Emergency Plan Training for staff persons #1, #2, #3 and #4 being conducted within the last year and all staff were employed more than 90 days.
At approximately 0930 HRS, in the "Front 'L' Room," Staff person #1 (AIDE), was observed supervising seven (7) Older Toddlers without being supervised by a staff person qualified at minimum as an Assistant Group Supervisor.
On the 3rd Floor (PS) Room in an unlocked, child-height counter drawer, were two (2) pair of adult scissors and a red, packing tape dispenser with a metal, jagged cutting surface, which posed a cutting hazard which was accessible to children.
The outdoor walkway, on the right side of the building, leading to the third-floor entrance door, a patch of concrete was missing which was approximately six (6) inches wide and three (3) feet long was observed posing a tripping hazard.
In the basement, (OT Room), above the baseboard heater in the back right corner, is exposed corner beard (which is used for drywalling) had sharp protruding edges which poses a cutting hazard. In the outdoor play space in the back of the building, near the side entrance gate was a blue, broken, plastic funnel, which poses a cutting hazard.
Two "Little Tikes Cozy Coupe" plastic cars were obstructing the gate at the bottom of the stairs leading to the outdoor play space.
The Updated Child Health Assessment for Children #4 (OT) lacked from the child file.
During a diaper change, a staff member was observed placing a soiled diaper on the changing table for the remaining duration of the diaper change instead of immediately discarding it.
The facility's fire alarm test report documented testing of the fire alarm system between 05/01/2023 and 06/01/2023 (32 Days). The test conducted was more than 30 days apart.
The Initial Child Health Report for Child #1, enrolled for more than 60 days, was lacking from the child file.
The Fee Agreement Forms for Child Files #1 and #4 lacked the "Fee Amount."
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #3 lacked the Name, Address and Phone Number of the Physician or Medical Care Provider.
The Emergency Contact form for Child File #2 lacked the address of the listed release person.
The Older Toddler Room, in the basement, lacked the required emergency contact information for four (4) children receiving care in the space. The infant room lacked the required emergency contact information for one (1) child receiving care in the space.
Staff person #1 was observed supervising and interacting with children without being supervised by an AGS or higher.
The file for Staff Person #1 lacked documentation of education, making it unable to be determined if the individual qualified as a staff person.
The two most recent State Police and FBI Clearances for Staff #1 were dated more than 60 months apart.
First aid kits in the facility lacked gauze pads.
In the two-year-old room, in the upper right-hand corner, above the large glass block window was blue peeling paint.
The Initial Health Assessment for Child File #5 was lacking a signature from the physician, physician's assistant or a CRNP.
Child file #1 (OT) lacked updated written verification of ongoing administered vaccines: 2 doses of Rotavirus and lacked a yearly (2022) Influenza shot with no Letter of Exemption in the File. Child file #4 (OT) lacked a yearly (2022) Influenza shot with no Letter of Exemption in the File. Child file #5 (INFANT) lacked updated written verification of ongoing administered vaccines: 1 Dose of DTAP and 1 Dose of Rotavirus.
The file for Staff #2 lacked a Health Assessment.
The file for Staff #2 on the health assessment dated 09/06/2022 did not indicate Staff #2 is "suitable for child-care."
During the inspection, the Hard wired, inter-connected fire detection system, (Model #9120 B) was tested and did not work properly. The facility file lacked proof of purchase for the hard-wired, inter-connected fire detection system. The fire extinguishers at the following areas had not been inspected since December 2020: Front Room by main door, backdoor, Pre-School Room and Kitchen.
The initial health assessment for Child File #5 was not present in the child file.
Staff person #4 who has worked at the facility for more than 90 days, had pediatric first aid and pediatric CPR training beyond 90 days.
The Emergency Contact form for child file #3 lacked the address of the listed release person.
The Infant and two-year-old rooms lacked the required emergency contact information for the children receiving care in the space.
The file for child #2 lacks verification of a flu vaccination.
Staff files #2 and #3 lack current health assessments.
The facility did not have proof of purchase for the fire detection system.
The facility did not log the testing of the fire detection system.
The facility did not have the liability insurance on file.
The file for staff #2 lacks general health and safety training that was due within 90 days of hire. Staff #2 does have current pediatric first and cpr.
Staff #1 through #4 lack mandated reporter training.
The file for staff #2 lacks verification of a HS diploma to qualify her as an AGS.
The file for child #1 lacks an updated parental signature on the emergency contact form and agreement.
The file for staff #2 lacks 2 non family reference letters.
Staff #1 lacks 6 of the 12 hours of annual child care training.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $60.00 | $60.00 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $60.00 | $60.00 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $60.00 | $60.00 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $60.00 | $60.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $60.00 | $60.00 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $60.00 | $60.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has Cassies Cradle had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 16 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jan 8, 2026 (background checks): “The file(s) for Staff Person(s) #2, #3 and #4 contained NSOR Certificates that were dated more than 60 months apart. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file(s) for Staff Person(s) #4 contained PA State Police and Child Abuse…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Cassies Cradle?
Pennsylvania lists 3 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Cassies Cradle’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Oct 19, 2018. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Cassies Cradle compare with other daycares in Homestead?
It is #8 of 9 centers in Homestead by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 87% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Cassies Cradle last inspected?
Jan 8, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does Cassies Cradle cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $60.00 for infant, $60.00 for young toddler, $60.00 for older toddler, $60.00 for preschool in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs Cassies Cradle?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Cassies Cradle INC.
Certified centers nearby
4102 Main St, Homestead · 0.4 mi away More citations than most Wee the Lil People Clubhouse LLC
4121 Main St, Homestead · 0.4 mi away · 34 spots Among the most cited Noahs Ark Christian Child Care CTR
612 Coal Rd, West Mifflin · 0.5 mi away · 179 spots About typical Musa/Little Lambs Early Learning Center
1705 Maple St, Homestead · 1.0 mi away · 96 spots About typical Musas After School and Summer Program
221 E 12th Ave, Homestead · 1.3 mi away More citations than most Busy Bee Playcare LLC
1234 Muldowney Ave, Pittsburgh · 1.4 mi away · 35 spots More citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.