Fairview Elem Care Program
Fairview Elem Care Program is a certified child care center in Waynesboro, PA. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 61 violations, 7 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for records & paperwork (19 of 61). 3 citations came in the last 12 months. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #4 of 9 centers in Waynesboro and has more citations per inspection than 75% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The file for staff person #1 was observed to lack documentation of a health assessment occurring every 24 months. This was evidenced by health forms in the file dated 08/28/2019 and 03/27/2023 a period of 42 months.
The file for Staff person #3 was observed to lack documentation of a valid first-aid and CPR acquired within 90 days of hire. This was evidenced by no CPR certification in the file, a period of 107 days from date of hire.
The file for staff person #2 was observed to lack documentation of participating at least annually, in fire safety training. This was evidenced by the most recent fire safety training certificate was dated 08/18/24 a period of 16 months.
The facility was observed to be providing a letter explaining the emergency procedures the parent of each enrolled child however, this letter failed to include information regarding the accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities and children with chronic medical conditions.
The facility was observed to have a medication prescribed to child #6 but failed to have written consent of the parent for administration of medication.
The facility was observed to lack evidence the operator notified local traffic safety authorities in writing annually of the location of the facility and the program's use of pedestrian and vehicular routes around the child care facility.
The files for staff persons #1, #2 and #3 were observed to lack a written evaluation of staff persons on a regular basis, a minimum of one evaluation every 12 months. As evidenced by an evaluation dated 2/27/2023 present in staff person #1's file, no evaluations present in staff person #2's file, and evaluations dated 02/27/23 and 08/20/2024 present in staff person #3's file.
The file for child #1 was observed to contain agreements that were not signed by the operator or the parent. The files for children #2, #3, #4 and #5 were observed to contain agreements that were not signed by the operator.
The files for children #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5 were observed to contain agreements that failed to specify the persons designated by a parent to whom the child may be released.
The files for children #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5 were observed to contain agreements that failed to specify the date of the child's admission.
Show 54 older citations
The Director or designated staff person who is responsible for compliance with this chapter did not ensure fire drills were conducted at least once every 60 days. The facility provided documentation of fire drills being conducted on 12/11/23 and 1/26/24.
Staff person #1 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): pediatric first aid/CPR from a PQAS approved trainer and a PQAS approved curriculum. Staff #1 had documentation of completing the online portion only on 1/18/24.
Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 ran away from the child care program at approximately 4:19 PM on 3/25/24 while Staff #1, #2, and #3 were providing care to Child #1 and 11 other school-age children. Based on interviews, Staff #1 yelled for Child #1 to stop and return to the program, but Child #1 kept running. Based on observation, Child #1 ran approximately .3 miles before Staff #3 lost sight of Child #1 and then Child #1 traveled about another .4 miles before arriving home. Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 arrived home at approximately 4:31 PM.
Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 ran away from the child care program at approximately 4:19 PM on 3/25/24 while Staff #1, #2, and #3 were providing care to Child #1 and 11 other school-age children. Based on interviews, Staff #1 yelled for Child #1 to stop and return to the program, but Child #1 kept running. Based on observation, Child #1 ran approximately .3 miles before Staff #3 lost sight of Child #1 and then Child #1 traveled about another .4 miles before arriving home. Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 arrived home at approximately 4:31 PM.
Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 ran away from the child care program at approximately 4:19 PM on 3/25/24 while Staff #1, #2, and #3 were providing care to Child #1 and 11 other school-age children. Based on interviews, Staff #1 yelled for Child #1 to stop and return to the program, but Child #1 kept running. Based on observation, Child #1 ran approximately .3 miles before Staff #3 lost sight of Child #1 and then Child #1 traveled about another .4 miles before arriving home. Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 arrived home at approximately 4:31 PM.
Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 ran away from the child care program at approximately 4:19 PM on 3/25/24 while Staff #1, #2, and #3 were providing care to Child #1 and 11 other school-age children. Based on interviews, Staff #1 yelled for Child #1 to stop and return to the program, but Child #1 kept running. Based on observation, Child #1 ran approximately .3 miles before Staff #3 lost sight of Child #1 and then Child #1 traveled about another .4 miles before arriving home. Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 arrived home at approximately 4:31 PM.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 1/8/24. The file of Staff #1, who was designated as an aide, lacked documentation of meeting one of the applicable staff qualifications for the position in which the person is performing.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 1/8/24. Staff #1, who was designated as an aide, is employed at a facility where less than 46 children are enrolled.
The file of Staff #1 lacked documentation of application for the National Sex Offender Registry Certificate prior to or on the date of initial hire (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 contained documentation of the NSOR requested on 12/8/23 and a NSOR dated 12/12/23.
On 1/8/24 observed broken connector pieces with rough edges. On 1/8/24 observed a cracked stencil.
The file of Child #3 contained a health report which did not include a statement that the child is able to participate in child care and appears to be free from contagious or communicable disease.
The file of Staff #1 lacked a health assessment conducted within 12 months prior to providing initial service in a child care setting (SEE LIS Code Sheet). The file of Staff #1 did not contain a health assessment.
The file of Staff #1 lacked an initial health assessment which included tuberculosis screening by Mantoux method at initial employment (SEE LIS Code Sheet). Staff #1 lacked documentation of a tuberculosis screening by Mantoux method being completed.
The facility created an emergency drill log, but it did not address the time to complete the drill, special accommodations the facility used for any category of children, the total number of adults and children participating in the drill, and problems encountered or observations during the drill.
The file of Child #1 lacked an initial health report no later than 60 days following the first day of attendance at the facility. Child #1 had an admission date of 8/23/23 with no health report in the file.
The file of Staff #1, who was designated as an aide, lacked documentation of meeting one of the applicable staff qualifications for the position in which the person is performing.
The file of Child #2 contained the original copy of the agreement. The facility did not make a copy for the file and give the original to the parent.
The file of Child #2 lacked signed parental consent for emergency medical care prior to admission on the emergency contact form.
The emergency contact for Child #4 was not reviewed and updated at least once in a 6-month period. Child #4's emergency contact was signed on 6/1/23 with no documentation of reviews and updates.
The file of Child #2 lacked signed parental consent for administration of minor first-aid by facility staff prior to admission on the emergency contact form.
It was observed that an agreement was not on file at the date of admission for Child #2. Child #2's date of admission was 8/23/23 with an agreement dated 9/14/23.
On 1/8/24 Certification Representative observed that the child records were not stored in a locked cabinet.
The file of Staff #1 did not include two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
Staff #1, who was designated as an aide, is employed at a facility where less than 46 children are enrolled.
2nd citation. Previously cited on 1/18/23. The file of Child #1 lacked an initial health report no later than 60 days following the first day of attendance at the facility. The file of Child #1, with an admission date of 8/24/22, did not contain a health report.
The file of Staff #1 lacked a State Police Clearance updated every 60 months. Staff #1 had a State Police Clearance dated 8/28/20 with a previous one dated 8/15/15.
At approximately 7:30 AM on 1/12/23 Staff #1 and #4 were caring for a group of mixed age children which included 14 young school age children and 3 older school age children. Staff #1 and #4 indicated they were sharing responsibility of the children. When asked to name the children, Staff #1 was able to name all of them, but Staff #4 was only able to name 6 of them.
The file of Staff #2 lacked documentation of completing the Pennsylvania Health and Safety Update 2022 by December 30, 2022. The emergency plan did not address continuity of operations.
The files of Staff #1 and #2 lacked documentation of receiving training regarding the emergency plan on an annual basis. Thes files of Staff #1 and #2 contained documentation of emergency plan training completed on 10/6/21 but no documentation for 2022.
On 1/12/23 observed a cracked bin containing card games including UNO. On 1/12/23 observed cracked Connector pieces. On 1/12/23 observed a cracked lid on a bin containing wooden blocks.
The files of Staff #1 and #2 lacked a health assessment conducted every 24 months. The file of Staff #1 contained a current health assessment dated 9/15/21 with a previous one dated 9/4/19. The file of Staff #2 contained a current health assessment dated 1/27/22 with a previous one dated 8/28/19.
The file of Staff #2 contained a health assessment which lacked documentation of a physical examination.
The file of Staff #3 lacked an adult health assessment which included a tuberculosis screening by Mantoux method at the time of initial employment (SEE LIS Code Sheet). Staff #3 had a Mantoux read date of 11/9/22.
The file of Staff #2 contained an adult health assessment which did not include an examination for communicable diseases and the results of that examination.
The file of Staff #2 contained an adult health assessment which did not include the physician's or CRNP's assessment of the person's suitability to provide child care.
An emergency drill was not conducted annually. The facility had documentation of an emergency drill being conducted on 11/17/21.
The Director or designated staff person did not ensure that fire drills were conducted at least once every 60 days. The facility provided documentation of fire drills being conducted on 12/20/21, 2/2/22, 3/29/22, 5/20/22, and 10/19/22. The facility was closed from 5/31/22 through 8/23/22 due to summer break.
The facility did not have an emergency plan that provides for accommodations for evacuation of children from the facility building and evacuation of children to a location away from the facility premises. The emergency plan did not contain evacuation routes and evacuation plans or written directions to exit the building.
The files of Children #3 and #5 lacked an initial health report no later than 60 days following the first day of attendance at the facility. The file of Child #3, with an admission date of 8/24/22, did not contain a health report. The file of Child #5, with an admission date of 8/24/22, did not contain a health report.
The operator lacked documentation of notifying the local traffic authorities annually in writing of the location of the facility and the program's use of pedestrian and vehicular routes around the child care facility. The operator provided documentation of local traffic authorities being notified on 10/14/22.
The file of Staff #1 lacked documentation of participating, at least annually, in fire safety training conducted by a fire protection professional. The file of Staff #1 contained documentation of fire safety training completed on 1/13/22 and 8/15/22 but no documentation for 2021.
Staff person #1 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): health and safety training. The health and safety training on file for Staff #1 was not valid because it was completed prior to 9/30/16.
Staff #1 lacked documentation of mandated reporter training completed every 60 months. Staff #1 had documentation of mandated reporter training completed on 12/15/20 with previous training completed on 5/4/15.
The files of Staff #1 and #2 lacked documentation of a written evaluation on a regular basis, a minimum of one evaluation every 12 months. The file of Staff 1 contained a written evaluation dated 3/1/21. The file of Staff #2 contained a written evaluation dated 9/2/21.
The files of Children #1, #2, #3, and #4 contained the original copies of the agreement. The facility did not make a copy for the files and give the original to the parent.
The file of Child #3 lacked the telephone number of the child's physician or source of medical care on the emergency contact form. The file of Child #5 lacked the complete address of the child's physician or source of medical care on the emergency contact form.
The file of Child #3 lacked the work telephone number of the enrolling parent on the emergency contact form.
The files of Children #3 and #5 lacked the health insurance coverage and policy number for a child under a family policy or Medical Assistance benefits, if applicable, on the emergency contact form.
The file of Child #1 lacked the complete address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released on the emergency contact form. The file of Child #3 lacked the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released on the emergency contact form. The file of Child #4 lacked the telephone number of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released on the emergency contact form.
A written plan identifying the means of transporting a child to emergency care and staffing provisions in the event of an emergency was not displayed conspicuously in every child care space.
The emergency contacts and agreements for Children #1, #2, #4, and #5 were not reviewed and updated at least once in a 6-month period. Child #1's emergency contact and agreement were signed on 6/8/22 with no reviews. Child #2's emergency contact and agreement were signed on 6/21/22 with no reviews. Child #4's emergency contact and agreement were signed on 5/23/22 with no reviews. Child #5's emergency contact and agreement were signed on 5/31/22 with no reviews.
The facility's current certificate of compliance was not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents. The certificate of compliance posted was dated 4/20/21 to 4/20/22.
Staff #1 lacked renewal of their certification in pediatric first aid and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on or before the expiration of the most current certification. The most current certification observed on file was dated 3/14/19 with expiration date of 3/14/21.
The emergency contact information for child #1 lacked health insurance coverage and policy number.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $33.00 | $33.00 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $33.00 | $33.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has Fairview Elem Care Program had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 7 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Mar 26, 2024 (caregiver conduct): “Based on interviews and documentation, Child #1 ran away from the child care program at approximately 4:19 PM on 3/25/24 while Staff #1, #2, and #3 were providing care to Child #1 and 11 other school-age children. Based…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Fairview Elem Care Program?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Fairview Elem Care Program’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Sep 4, 2019. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Fairview Elem Care Program compare with other daycares in Waynesboro?
It is #4 of 9 centers in Waynesboro by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 75% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Fairview Elem Care Program last inspected?
Jan 14, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does Fairview Elem Care Program cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $33.00 for young school-age, $33.00 for older school-age in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs Fairview Elem Care Program?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is YMCA Of Waynesboro PA.
Certified centers nearby
100 S Church St, Waynesboro · 0.6 mi away · 135 spots Among the most cited Faith Builders Day Care
801 Park St, Waynesboro · 0.7 mi away · 167 spots Among the most cited Todays New Start Learning Center & Child Care
118 Walnut St, Waynesboro · 0.7 mi away · 68 spots About typical Wee Kare Child Center
508 N Grant St, Waynesboro · 0.9 mi away · 114 spots More citations than most Summitview Elem Care Program
840 E 2nd St, Waynesboro · 1.5 mi away Among the most cited Waynesboro Early Learning Center
1801 E Main St, Waynesboro · 2.2 mi away · 236 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.