Kidsville Daycare is a certified child care center in Pittsburgh, PA, with capacity for 109 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times. The state cited 48 violations, 6 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for records & paperwork (14 of 48). 3 citations came in the last 12 months. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #73 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh and has more citations per inspection than 67% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
An electrical outlet in the hallway located to the right of the boy's bathroom was observed to lack protective covers and is accessible to children 5 years of age or younger.
In the boy's bathroom, one toilet was observed to lack a handwashing sign. In the girl's bathroom, the toilet in the middle stall was observed to lack a handwashing sign.
The staff file for Staff person #1 contained current mandated reporter training dated 10/6/24 which was not renewed within 60 months from the previously existing mandated reporter certificate dated 10/3/19. The staff file for Staff person #2 contained current mandated reporter training dated 11/14/25 which was not renewed within 60 months from the previously existing mandated reporter certificate dated 11/3/20.
At approximately 4:15pm, Staff #3 greeted the Cert. Rep. at the door to allow entry into the facility. Upon entering the gym, 29 young school-age and preschool age children along with three staff were observed. During the onset of supervision and ratio, when each staff were asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for, Staff person #1 identified and named 12 young school aged children, Staff person #2 identified and named 9 preschool age children, and Staff person #3 identified and named 8 preschool age children. Therefore, since no other staff were present at the facility, ratio was determined to have been 2:29 when Staff #3 left the gym.
At approximately 4:15pm, Staff #3 greeted the Cert. Rep. at the door to allow entry into the facility. Upon entering the gym, 29 young school-age and preschool age children along with three staff were observed. During the onset of supervision and ratio, when each staff were asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for, Staff person #1 identified and named 12 young school aged children, Staff person #2 identified and named 9 preschool age children, and Staff person #3 identified and named 8 preschool age children. Therefore, It was determined that staff #3 was not physically present with the children in their group during the time staff left to answer the door.
The facility's annual fire detection system report by a fire professional dated 4/30/24 was observed to be more that 12 months old.
The file for Child #1 through Child #10, who are preschool age children, lacked a child service report.
Six-month reviews of the Emergency Contact Forms and Financial Agreements for Child #1 was deemed invalid due to Staff person #1, who stated that they are in charge of child files, disclosure that they entered the parent's name and backdated the review date to avoid a citation for noncompliance.
**Six-month reviews of the Emergency Contact Forms and Financial Agreements for Child #1 was deemed invalid due to Staff person #1, who stated that they are in charge of child files, disclosure that they entered the parent's name and backdated the review date to avoid a citation for noncompliance.
*Six-month reviews of the Emergency Contact Forms and Financial Agreements for Child #1 was deemed invalid due to Staff person #1, who stated that they are in charge of child files, disclosure that they entered the parent's name and backdated the review date to avoid a citation for noncompliance.
Show 38 older citations
***Six-month reviews of the Emergency Contact Forms and Financial Agreements for Child #1 was deemed invalid due to Staff person #1, who stated that they are in charge of child files, disclosure that they entered the parent's name and backdated the review date to avoid a citation for noncompliance.
The two trash receptacles used in the Gymnasium were observed to contain used yogurt containers, spoons, and milk cartons that have been contaminated by human secretions and to they did not have lids.
The initial health assessment on file for Child #2, who is a school aged, was not dated in accordance with the requirements for medical examinations for school attendance in 28 Pa. Code § 23.2 (relating to medical examinations).
The facility emergency plan was observed to lack the evacuation routes to exit the school building and to a location away from the facility premises.
The staff file for Staff person #1 was observed to contain fire safety trainings that were conducted more than 12 months apart; those fire safety trainings are dated 1/19/23 and 2/7/24.
The child file for Child #1 was observed to have a current financial agreement form that lacked the specific fee amount to be charged.
The facility's emergency plan did not address continuity of operations in the event of an emergency.
The letter to the parents that explains the facility's emergency plan did not include information regarding a lockdown or accommodations in the event of an emergency.
There were two uncovered outlets on the wall in the hallway, outside the restrooms.
There were no handwashing signs posted in the boys restroom at a sink and a toilet.
The pick-up and drop off procedures were not posted at the facility.
The most recent fire alarm inspection report on file at the facility was dated 8/1/22. Act 62 requires an annual inspection when an operator is unable to test the facility's smoke alarms.
There was no documentation of completion of the required health & safety update training on file for Facility Persons #1 and #4. The health & safety update training completed and documented on file for Facility Persons #2, #3, #5 and #6 were completed after the required due date of 12/30/22.
Upon entry to the facility alongside Facility Person #1, at approximately 3:55 PM, it was observed there were 12 young schoolagers and 9 preschoolers present in the hallway outside of the gym/cafeteria with no staff person in the hallway to supervise them until the arrival of Facility Person #1. Current children's agreements on file notate that program begins at 3:50 PM.
Upon entry to the facility alongside Facility Person #1, at approximately 3:55 PM, it was observed there were 12 young schoolagers and 9 preschoolers present in the hallway outside of the gym/cafeteria with no staff person in the hallway to supervise them until the arrival of Facility Person #1. Current children's agreements on file notate that program begins at 3:50 PM.
Upon entry to the facility alongside Facility Person #1, at approximately 3:55 PM, it was observed there were 12 young schoolagers and 9 preschoolers present in the hallway outside of the gym/cafeteria with no staff person in the hallway to supervise them until the arrival of Facility Person #1. Current children's agreements on file notate that program begins at 3:50 PM.
The emergency plan did not include a plan for continuity of operations in the event of an emergency.
The most recent review date documented on the emergency plan was 1/25/19.
The letter to be provided to the parents regarding the emergency plan does not include the facility's plan for a lockdown.
There was hand sanitizer and a spray bottle containing a cleaner on a chest refrigerator in the gym, in reach of the children.
There was a spray bottle containing a cleaner in the gym, not labeled with the contents.
The initial health assessment on file for child #2, a schoolager, was not dated in accordance with the requirements for medical examinations for school attendance in 28 Pa. Code § 23.2 (relating to medical examinations).
The most recent health assessments on file for children #1 and #3 (preschoolers) were completed more than 12 months prior.
The children in care did not wash their hands prior to having their snack.
There was no documentation that an emergency drill had been conducted.
There was no documentation that the current emergency plan was sent to the county emergency management agency and the local municipality.
The daily activity schedule was located in a folder in a backpack taken by staff to child care spaces when in use, not posted in the child care spaces.
There were no child service reports that were completed. and a copy given to parents, on file for children #1 and #3, both enrolled at the facility more than 6 months
The children's emergency contact forms are accessible to staff electronically via the use of an app installed on an ipad. The ipad was located in the hallway while the children were in the cafeteria/gym. Staff supervising children in the cafeteria/gym were unable to access the emergency contact information for the children in care on their devices while in the child care space with them.
The medical emergency transportation plan was located in a folder in a backpack taken by staff to child care spaces when in use, not posted in the child care spaces.
According to staff, the information on how to access the regulations electronically had not yet been shared with the parents.
The file of facility person #1 contained an NSOR verification certificate dated 10/7/2021 which was after the provisional hire period and their start date of 9/8/2021 at this location. Facility person #1 now has a current NSOR verification certificate.
Ten electrical outlets in the gym were not covered with protective receptacle covers.
The first-aid kit was in a backpack on the table accessible to children in care.
An Epi-Pen and Zyrtec were in a backpack on the table accessible to children.
The emergency contact form of child #4 did not contain the address and telephone number and child #5 did not contain the telephone number of their physician or source of medical care.
The emergency contact form of child #1 and 3 did not contain the home telephone number and child #4 did not contain the home telephone number and work address of the enrolling parent.
The emergency contact form of child #2 and 5 did not address information on the child's special needs.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
About this center
Common questions
Has Kidsville Daycare had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 6 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on May 1, 2025 (staff ratios): “At approximately 4:15pm, Staff #3 greeted the Cert. Rep. at the door to allow entry into the facility. Upon entering the gym, 29 young school-age and preschool age children along with three staff were observed. During…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Kidsville Daycare?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at Kidsville Daycare since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Kidsville Daycare’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Jun 27, 2025. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Kidsville Daycare compare with other daycares in Pittsburgh?
It is tied for #73 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 67% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Kidsville Daycare last inspected?
Mar 3, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
Who runs Kidsville Daycare?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Stuckey Daycare INC.
Certified centers nearby
5324 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.2 mi away · 104 spots About typical Arsenal Family & Childrens Center
336 S Aiken Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.2 mi away · 52 spots About typical Endless Potential Nonprofit INC Learning Academy
5321 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.2 mi away · 26 spots Among the most cited Earthen Vessels Outreach
250 S Pacific Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.2 mi away · 66 spots Among the most cited Learning Loft on Baum
5732 Baum Blvd, Pittsburgh · 0.3 mi away · 136 spots More citations than most Shine Bright Child Care & Learning CTR LLC
5502 Baum Blvd, Pittsburgh · 0.3 mi away · 83 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.