Learning Loft on Baum
Learning Loft on Baum is a certified child care center in Pittsburgh, PA, with capacity for 136 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 (accredited) rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 7 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 59 violations, 5 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for building & playground safety (18 of 59). 4 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #131 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh and has more citations per inspection than 83% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The file for Facility Person #1, who is a volunteer, was observed to lack a valid disclosure statement; the one on file was for employment purposes.
The staff file for Staff person #2 contained current mandated reporter training dated 7/30/24 which was not renewed within 60 months from the previously existing mandated reporter certificate dated 7/15/19.
The child file for Child #1 contained an initial child service report on file dated 6/19/26 which was completed more than 6 months after the child's date of admission.
The child file for Child #2 contained a current financial agreement form that lacked the child's arrival and departure times.
The staff file for Staff person #1 was observed to contain a current National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) check dated 6/15/23 which was not obtained within 45 days of hire (See IS CODE SHEET).
Inside the upstairs bathroom used by the children in care, the doorknob to the storage closest was observed to be semidetached from the door causing it not to be in good repair.
The child file for Child #3, who is a young toddler, was observed to lack an updated health report every 6 months; the most recent health report on file is dated 12/19/24.
The Preschool 4 Annex and the Upstairs Hallway Rooms were observed to lack a written daily schedule of activities.
The child file for Child #1 and Child #2 contained a current financial agreement form that was observed to lack the date on which the fee is to be paid.
The child file for Child #2 contained a current financial agreement form that lacked the child's admission date.
Show 49 older citations
The staff file for Staff person #3 who is functioning as Group Supervisor and Staff persons #2, #4, #5, #7, and #8, who are functioning as an Assistant Group Supervisor, lacked proper documentation of verification of years' experience working with children; The prospective employer filled out the employee verification form and did not properly notate on the form who and when they spoke with the previous employer to verify employment hours.
The staff file for Staff person #2 lacked 7.5 of the 12 clock hours of annual childcare training required from 2/2024 - 2/2025.
In the Front Infant/Toddler Room, the sheets being used in two of the cribs used by an infant in care was observed to be loose fitting thus allowing them to bunch up and cause a potential suffocation hazard.
The letter to the parents explaining the emergency plan does not address annual emergency drills.
In the PreK 3 Room a Clean Smart Toy disinfectant labeled 'Keep Out of Reach of Children' was observed inside an unlocked storage cabinet in the bathroom; the lock on the storage cabinet was broken thus making the disinfectant accessible to the preschool age children in care.
When tested the hot water coming from the upstairs bathroom sinks located to the right of the Flex PS Room, which are used by the children in care to wash their hands, both tested between 114° F and 115° F.
The Back Infant/Toddler Room was observed to lack a first-aid kit.
The sink in the Front Infant/Toddler Room, which is used by the toddlers in care, was observed to lack a platform or steps for the toddlers to use while washing their hands.
The staff file for Staff person #1, contained a current health assessment dated 6/30/23 which was conducted more than 24 months from the previously dated 4/30/21 health assessment on file.
The child file for Child #4 contained a child service report in the file that lacked a date; therefore, it is unable to be determined if the child service report was completed within six months of the prior report.
In the Front Infant/Toddler Room, 6 infants and 1 young toddler were observed to be receiving care in the space and their emergency contact forms were not present.
The child file for Child #1 through Child #10 contained an updated emergency contact information form that lacked an area for signed parental consent for walking excursions.
During a complaint investigation conducted on 6/27/24 it was disclosed that the report for an incident which occurred on 6/12/24 at 5:00pm was not written up and given to the parent until the next morning on 6/13/24.
The mandated reporter training documentation on file for Facility Person #1, presented by the operator upon request for review, appeared to be manipulated. It was confirmed by the training entity that there was no record of Facility Person #1 having completed the mandated reporter training on the date listed on the certificate.
The letter to the parents explaining the facility's emergency plan did not include the plan for lockdown or accommodations.
There were containers of disinfectant wipes on the floor outside of an unlocked exit door from the gym, accessible to children.
There was no first aid kit present in the Pre-K 4 Annex.
First aid kits in rooms used by schoolagers (the Learning Hub, the upper hallway, the large gross motor room) were mounted on walls, in reach of schoolage children in care. There was a first aid kit in a low unlocked cabinet in reach of children.
There were areas of damaged plaster/peeling paint on a wall in the gross motor room near where the riding toys are stored. There were also some paint chips on the floor in this area.
There was a bassinet in the infant room used by a child in care that was not labeled with the child 's name.
The immunization record on file for child #1 did not indicate the child had sufficient doses of the Hepatits A and DTAP vaccines as recommended for a child of their age by the ACIP. There was no documentation of a current influenza vaccine on file for child #4, recommended annually by the ACIP. Children #1 and #4 must be dismissed from care by close of business 8/1/23 and may only return to care when the immunization record is updated or when a parent provides a written, signed exemption letter.
There was triple antibiotic ointment cream in a first aid kit, not labeled with a specific child's name to only be used by that child.
There was insulin in a bag in a low unlocked cabinet in reach of children in the café.
A staff person caring for children in the infant room was observed changing an infant's diaper in the without washing their hands afterwards.
There were no written feeding schedules from parents at the facility for 2 enrolled infants.
Documentation of smoke detector testing on file indicates testing was completed on 3/15/23 and then again on 4/20/23, more than 30 days apart.
Facility Person #2 has not completed mandated reporter training within the last 60 months. This is evidenced by the previously documented mandated reporter training on file on 9/5/23 being dated 7/28/18.
The daily activity schedule posted in the Learning Hub, a space used by school agers, was the schedule that only addressed before and after school programming. During the summer months, when the inspection was conducted, shoolagers receive full day care in the classroom.
The emergency contact forms on file for children #1, #2, and #3 did not include the health insurance information.
The emergency contact forms on file for children #4 and #5 did not include addresses of all release persons listed.
The emergency contact forms present in the classrooms with the children did not include all information required under 3270.124 (physician's information, health insurance information, consent for emergency medical care).
There was a Seventh Generation disinfectant cleaner in an unlocked cabinet in reach of children in the Learning Hub.
There was a loose face plate on a wall outlet in the Preschool 3 room.
There was an area of peeling paint and damaged plaster behind a trash can in the Preschool 3 room.
There was no stool at the sink in the front infant room to allow for the young toddlers in the room to stand on and reach the sink.
Eight of the rest mats in use in the Preschool 4 room and three in the front infant room were not labeled with the names of the children who were using them.
The immunization exemptions for the flu vaccine written by the parents of children #1 and #2 were not signed by the parents.
There were 2 albuterol inhalers present in the cafe with no written instructions in the facility from the individuals who prescribed the medicines.
There were sample packets of medication (burn cream, triple antibiotic ointment) in the first aid kit in the cafe, not labeled with any individual children's names.
There was a tacrolimus ointment in the cafe with no written parental consent for administration on file.
In the infant room bottles and a bottle warmer were located next to a sink where hands are washed after diapering.
The most recent fire alarm test that was completed and documented on the facility's log was notated as completed on 8/4/22, more than 30 days prior.
There was no daily activity schedule posted in the Preschool 4 Annex.
There were no emergency contact forms in the Preschool 4 room for the children who were receiving care in that room.
At approximately 4:35 in the indoor playground, Facility Persons #1, #2, and #3 were supervising 11 preschoolers. When asked to identify which children they were each supervising, FP #1 identified 3 children. Then FP #2 identified 5 children. Then, before FP #3 identified her children, FP#1 left the room and handed her supervision cards to FP #3 to assign them to her care. FP#3 then identified 4 children she was supervising, with the aid of the supervision cards. A total of 9 of the 11 present children were identified as supervised by one of the present staff. It was determined that there was one child in each supervision group that was not identified by the respective staff person.
According to staff statements, children are not taken outdoors. They had not taken the children outside since the program began providing care at the facility on 6/23/22.
There were areas of peeling paint and damaged plaster on the walls in the indoor playground.
Handwashing signs were not present at toilets in the Indoor Playground restroom, the lobby restroom, the Preschool 3 restroom, and the Upstairs Hall restroom
There was no proof of purchase of the interconnected fire alarm system installed in the facility.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $84.04 | $66.72 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $83.56 | $63.57 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $81.46 | $60.10 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $73.02 | $56.19 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $65.93 | $45.64 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $65.93 | $45.64 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has Learning Loft on Baum had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 5 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jul 14, 2026 (background checks): “The file for Facility Person #1, who is a volunteer, was observed to lack a valid disclosure statement; the one on file was for employment purposes.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Learning Loft on Baum?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Learning Loft on Baum’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4 (accredited), effective May 6, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Learning Loft on Baum compare with other daycares in Pittsburgh?
It is tied for #131 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 83% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Learning Loft on Baum last inspected?
Jul 14, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does Learning Loft on Baum cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $84.04 for infant, $83.56 for young toddler, $81.46 for older toddler, $73.02 for preschool in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs Learning Loft on Baum?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Brittini R Wright LLC.
Certified centers nearby
5502 Baum Blvd, Pittsburgh · 0.2 mi away · 83 spots Among the most cited Tender Care Learning Centers
5425 Baum Blvd, Pittsburgh · 0.3 mi away · 90 spots More citations than most Arsenal Family & Childrens Center
336 S Aiken Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.3 mi away · 52 spots About typical Kidsville Daycare
201 S Graham St, Pittsburgh · 0.3 mi away · 109 spots More citations than most London Bridges Child Development LLC
5938 Baum Blvd, Pittsburgh · 0.4 mi away · 84 spots Among the most cited Liberty Extended Day Program
601 Filbert St, Pittsburgh · 0.4 mi away Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.