New Holland Early Learning Center
New Holland Early Learning Center is a certified child care center in New Holland, PA, with capacity for 112 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 73 violations, 6 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for building & playground safety (22 of 73). 26 citations came in the last 12 months, including 2 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #130 of 144 centers in Lancaster County and has more citations per inspection than 87% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
At the time of the follow up visit to verify corrections for SIN-00291564 (from 7/7/26), it was observed that the plan of corrections for the violation citing 3270.76 had not been fully implemented. On 8/12/26, sharp/prickly creeping thistle was still present along the fence in preschool play area.
At the time of the follow up visit to verify corrections for SIN-00291564 (from 7/7/26), it was observed that the plan of corrections for the violation citing 3270.102(e) and 3270.103 had not been fully implemented. On 8/12/26, Mulch was still accessible along the edge of the fence on the toddler playground. In addition, pieces of rubber mulch from the preschool playground were observed on the sandy area of the toddler playground.
Staff person #4 worked for a period of time during the previous year with expired clearances on file. The child abuse clearance expired 10/28/2025, but was not updated until 5/6/26. The DHS FBI clearance expired 4/22/26, but was not updated until 4/29/26. Staff person #5's criminal record was not submitted to the regional office for review. Upon beginning work in the facility, the record for staff person #7 did not contain completed a completed NSOR as required under the CPSL. The record for facility person #8 did not include a DHS FBI clearance. In addition, the facility person's previous child abuse clearance expired 12/1/2020, but was not updated until 4/3/26. Upon beginning work in the facility, the record for staff person #10 did not contain completed a completed PA state police clearance as required under the CPSL. The record also did not include documentation the facility person has requested the outstanding clearance as required for provisional hiring under the CPSL. The clearance was obtained 222 days after the employee began working with children. The record for facility person #13 did not include a current NSOR certificate. The record for facility person #16 did not…
The information given to parents about the emergency plan does not address accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities and children with chronic medical conditions.
Pod #4 - The first aid kit did not include gloves. (CORRECTED ON SITE)
Backpacks containing first aid kits were accessible to children on the blacktop area and in the outdoor school-age area. (CORRECTED ON SITE)
A portion of a ceiling tile was missing in the Ladybugs room. 9 ceiling tiles were wet in Pod #3. 1 ceiling tile was wet in Pod #4. Large fence screws were protruding inwards towards the playground on the toddler playground. Old volleyball netting was on the ground on the blacktop where toddlers were playing. (CORRECTED ON SITE) Sharp/prickly creeping thistle was present along the fence in preschool play area.
There was not handwashing sign in the little bathroom.
Blacktop - A cloth soccer ball was ripped and pieces were coming off of it. (CORRECTED ON SITE) The tic-tac-toe on the large climber has a sharp broken piece.
Landscaping mulch was accessible to the toddlers playing on the blacktop area. Mulch was accessible to toddlers along the edge of the toddler fence.
The most recent health assessment on file for child #1 (toddler) was more than 6 months old (dated 9/2025). Health assessments on file for child #3 (toddler) were dated in June of 2025 and subsequently more than 6 months later in February of 2026. Health assessments on file for child #4 (toddler) were dated in March of 2025 and subsequently more than 6 months later in February of 2026. The most recent health assessment on file for child #5 (toddler) was more than 6 months old (dated 8/2025).
The immunization records on file for children #1 and #5 were not in accordance with the schedule recommended by the ACIP. Child #1 - Missing 3rd DTAP, 3rd Pneumococcal, 1st MMR and 1st Varicella. Child #5 - Missing 4th DTAP, 3rd HIB, 1st MMR, 1st Varicella, and 1st Hep A.
Staff person #5 did not have a health assessment on file that was dated in the 12 months prior to their start date. The health assessments on file for staff person #8 were dated in March of 2023 and subsequently more than 24 months later in May of 2026. Facility person #13 did not have a health assessment on file. Facility person #16 did not have a health assessment on file that was dated in the 12 months prior to their start date. The health assessments on file for staff person #25 were dated in October of 2023 and subsequently more than 24 months later in April of 2026.
The health assessment on file for staff person #12 does not include an examination for communicable diseases and the results of that examination. The health assessment also does not include the physician's or CRNP's assessment of the person's suitability to provide child care.
The proof and date of purchase of an interconnected fire detection device was not on file with the facility's fire drill logs.
Staff persons #1, #2, #3, #12, #14, #15, #17, #18, #20, #22, and #25 participated in fire safety training in January of 2025 and subsequently more than 12 months later in May of 2026. Staff person #11 participated in fire safety training in January of 2025 and subsequently more than 12 months later in April of 2026. Facility person #12 participated in fire safety training in October of 2023 and subsequently more than 12 months later in May of 2026. Facility person #19 participated in fire safety training in April of 2025 and subsequently more than 12 months later in June of 2026.
Staff evaluations were completed for staff persons #1, #2, #6, #9, #14, #17, #19, and #20 in July of 2024 and subsequently more than 12 months later in August of 2025. Staff person #23 has been employed for more than 12 months and does not have a staff evaluation on file.
The written plan of daily activities was not posted in Pod #1.
The emergency contact information on file for child #2 did not include the child's health insurance coverage and policy number.
Pod #4 group - Only 2 emergency contact forms were present with a group of 7 children.
The record for child #2 did not include signed parental consent for emergency medical care or for the administration of minor first-aid procedures by facility staff.
The record for staff persons #7 and #8, and for facility person #16 each included just one written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person. The record for facility person #24 does not include two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
Staff person #23 completed professional development in the topic of pediatric first aid and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation 325 days after the date of hire.
During the previous training year (2025), staff person #1 completed 9 clock hours of child care training. During the previous training year (10/24-10/25), staff person #9 completed 10 clock hours of child care training.
The file of facility person #1 does not contain a completed Ohio child abuse clearance or a completed Ohio sexual offender document.
During the unannounced monitoring, it was confirmed by the facility director that the last logged fire alarm system test was completed on 10.9.25 [Current date: 11.18.25], so therefore the maximum period of 30-days has been exceeded between required testing of the system.
Show 47 older citations
Both the Facility Director and the Assistant Director confirmed that on 7.15.25, approximately 8-10 younger school aged children were transported in private vehicles of staff persons without the use of required safety booster or full car seats in place for each child.
The file of Staff Person #1 contains a NSOR dated 6.18.20 which is more than 60 months old. There is an updated NSOR dated 7.15.25, but the facility director admitted that Staff Person #1 was working with children after the expiration of the 6.18.20 document and prior to receiving the updated record. The file of Staff Person #2 does not contain a completed DHS required FBI clearance [Dept. of Education record on file dated 5.30.24]. The file of Staff Person #4 contains a DHS FBI clearance dated 5.18.20 which is more than 60 months old. There is an updated DHS FBI clearance dated 7.16.25, but the facility director admitted that Staff Person #4 was working with children after the expiration of the 5.18.20 document and prior to receiving the updated record.
Upon entry into the facility for the purpose of a renewal inspection, it was observed that the most currently updated emergency plans were not posted, but rather a copy of an outdated emergency plan.
Upon inspection of the physical site area hallways, it was found that multiple containers of sunscreen and diaper ointment had been placed into cubby's that were accessible to children in care.
Upon inspection of each childcare space, it was found that the first aid kits [2] for both portions of the school-aged childcare space were being kept in locations that were within easy access to the children in care.
Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the health assessment on file for Child #1 [dated 2.28.25] did not include a response to the statement that the child is able to participate in childcare and appears to be free from contagious or communicable disease.
Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the health assessment on file for Child #1 [dated 2.28.25] did not include a response to the statement that age-appropriate screenings recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics were conducted since the time of the previous health report required by this section.
Upon inspection of Staff Person records, it was found that the file for Staff Person #3 included a health assessment dated 5.17.23 [expired 5.31.25].
Upon inspection of each childcare space, it was found that a written plan of daily activities and routines was not posted within the school-aged childcare space.
Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the agreement on file for Child #1 - Child #6 did not specify the services which are to be considered as extra.
The file of facility person #3 contains a NSOR dated 1.9.2020 which is more than 60 months old. There is no application in the file for an updated child abuse clearance. In addition, the file for facility person # 3 does not contain an up-to-date verification of the completion of Mandated Reporter Training [certificate on file expired on 2.25.25]. The file of facility person #4 does not contain a completed NSOR verification. The file does not contain copies of request(s) for the clearances/verification. The file of facility person #5 contains a NSOR dated 1.9.2020 which is more than 60 months old. There is no application in the file for an updated child abuse clearance. The file of facility person #6 contains a NSOR dated 1.9.2020 which is more than 60 months old. There is no application in the file for an updated child abuse clearance. The file of facility person #7 contains a NSOR dated 1.9.2020 which is more than 60 months old. There is no application in the file for an updated child abuse clearance. The file of facility person #8 contains a NSOR dated 1.9.2020 which is more than 60 months old. There is no application in the file for an updated child abuse clearance. The file…
Immediately upon arrival at the facility for an Unannounced Monitoring, it was observed that one group [Dragonflies] was playing outdoors. Three staff persons were observed in ratio with 14 children. When Staff Person #2 was asked to name and identify her primary childcare group, she indicated that she could not fully understand the instructions [language barrier], but she could not clearly identify the 5 specific children in her primary care group [however she could identify all 14 children in the outdoor space by name].
Upon inspection of each childcare space, it was observed in the Fireflies space that two types of plants were present that were easily accessible to children in care. Staff Person # 1 identified the plants as Narcissus and Amaryllis, which upon further investigation are found to be toxic to humans.
Upon inspection of each childcare space, it was observed in the Ladybugs space that some cardboard blocks were ripped/torn and not in good condition.
Staff person #3 has not completed Pediatric first aid and CPR training on or before expiration of the most current certification. This is evidenced by the previously documented Pediatric first aid and CPR training on file expiring (8.6.22). Documentation of updated Pediatric first aid and CPR training is not on file, however a document indicating completion of an online component of the required training dated 4.27.24 was on file.
Upon entry to the facility for an Unannounced Monitoring, it was immediately observed that an expired copy [expired 10.28.24] of the Facility Certificate of Compliance was posted at the entryway door.
The file of Staff Person #1 does not contain a completed NSOR verification. The file does not contain copies of request(s) for the clearances/verification.
Upon inspection of each of the physical childcare spaces, it was found that the first aid kit in the school-aged space was accessible to children in care.
Upon inspection of each of the physical childcare spaces, it was found that there was 1 ceiling tile missing and 8 damaged in the Lady Bugs [OT] childcare space.
Upon inspection of each of the physical childcare spaces, it was found that there was peeling paint near the sink in the school-aged childcare space.
Upon inspection of each of the physical childcare spaces, it was found that there was prescription medication accessible to children in the backpack of the school-aged childcare space.
Upon inspection of personnel files, it was found that the results of an initial TB screening were not included in the file of Staff Person #1. The record did show that a screening had been initiated, but no results were found anywhere in the file.
Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that an updated [within 6 months] Child Service Report was not completed or on file for Child #1.
Upon investigation of the self-reported non-compliance concerns resulting in child injury on 6.5.24, it was confirmed that the facility did have scooters that did not have rubberized grip protection [as originally equipped by the manufacturer] on the handlebars, which contributed to the injury of Child #1 when two children collided while at play.
Upon inspection of the facility emergency plans, it was found that a continuity of operations plan was not included in the most recently revised plans.
Upon inspection of the exterior play space, it was found that the area used by the older toddlers and preschool aged children had embedded playground equipment with a mulch depth of less than 1" directly under the equipment.
Upon inspection of the facility first aid kits, it was found that the first aid kit used by the school aged children did not contain soap.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the health assessment on file for child #3 was dated 3.10.21 and therefore expired on 3.10.22. No updated health assessment is on file after that date.
Upon inspection of the infant childcare space, two diaper changes were observed and in both cases, the child's hands were wiped with a diaper wipe, but no soap and water were used prior to returning the child to the childcare space.
Upon inspection of staff files, it was found that no initial health assessment or TB test was on file for staff person #4. Facility director confirmed that staff person #4 had been working with children. Also, it was found that the health assessment on file for staff person #6 was dated 4.5.21 and therefore expired on 4.5.23.
Upon inspection of the facility emergency plans, it was found that accommodations for infants and toddlers was not included in the most recently revised plans.
Upon inspection of the facility's emergency drill logs, it was found that no emergency drill had been performed since the last renewal inspection.
Upon inspection of the facility fire safety logs, it was found that the minimum testing limit of 30 days was exceeded between the testing on 2.20.23 and 3.23.23
Staff person #1 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Health and Safety Training 2022 update; Staff person #3 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric First Aid/CPR training; Staff person #4 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric First Aid/CPR training; Staff person #6 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Health and Safety Training 2022 Update. Staff person #8 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Health and Safety Training 2022 Update.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #6 did not contain the name, address and telephone number of the child's physician or source of medical care.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the designated area for special needs/disabilities on the emergency contact document for child #6 was blank.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #6 did not include the address[s] of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #1 was last reviewed on 12.27.22 and the financial agreement was last reviewed on 12.27.22; Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #2 was last reviewed on 1.11.23 and the financial agreement was last reviewed on 1.11.23; Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #3 was last reviewed on 8.3.22; Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #4 was last reviewed on 12.29.22 and the financial agreement was last reviewed on 12.29.22; Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #5 was last reviewed on 8.5.22 and the financial agreement was last reviewed on 8.5.22; Upon inspection of children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #6 was last reviewed on 12.27.22 and the financial agreement was last reviewed on 12.27.22;
Upon inspection of each individual childcare space, it was found that multiple emergency contact documents on file in each space was old/expired and did not match the master file documentation.
Upon inspection of staff files, it was found that the records for staff persons #1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #7 and #8 did not contain verification of childcare experience either prior to OR from the outset of service at the facility.
Upon inspection of the facility person's files, it was found that facility person #3 had only one written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person; that facility person #4 had no written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person; that facility person #5 had only one written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
Upon inspection of each child care space, it was found that the refrigerator in the young toddler room [Bumblebees] was at/above 50 degrees.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the health assessment for child #2 was dated 1.11.21 and therefore expired.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the record for influenza vaccination for child #2 was missing with no exemption on file AND for child #4, the last influenza vaccination was dated from 2020.
Upon inspection of the facility fire safety logs, it was found that testing of the alarm system was conduct on the following dates: 10.28.21, 11.30.21, 2.14.22, 2.15.22, 3.8.22, 3.14.22, 4.21.22, 5.25.22, 6.21.22. Therefore the required 30 day testing threshold was exceeded on multiple occasions.
Upon inspection of the children's files, it was found that the emergency contact document for child #2 - #5 had not been reviewed/updated within the past six months and the parental agreement for child #3 had not been reviewed/updated within the past six months.
Child #1 was served and did consume a fish-based product, despite the fact that facility records showed that the child did have a seafood allergy.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $53.00 | $45.00 |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $53.00 | $45.00 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $53.00 | $45.00 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $53.00 | $45.00 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $46.40 | $36.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $47.20 | $23.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has New Holland Early Learning Center had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 6 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jul 7, 2026 (background checks): “Staff person #4 worked for a period of time during the previous year with expired clearances on file. The child abuse clearance expired 10/28/2025, but was not updated until 5/6/26. The DHS FBI clearance expired…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about New Holland Early Learning Center?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is New Holland Early Learning Center’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4, effective Sep 14, 2025. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does New Holland Early Learning Center compare with other daycares in Lancaster County?
It is tied for #130 of 144 centers in Lancaster County by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 87% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was New Holland Early Learning Center last inspected?
Aug 12, 2026 (unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does New Holland Early Learning Center cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $53.00 for newborn, $53.00 for infant, $53.00 for young toddler, $53.00 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs New Holland Early Learning Center?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is New Holland Mennonite Church.
Certified centers nearby
428 Ranck Rd, New Holland · 2.3 mi away · 194 spots About typical Steps to Success INC
18 Quarry Rd, Leola · 5.2 mi away · 83 spots Among the most cited Diamond Street Early Childhood Center
1311 Diamond St Ste A, Akron · 5.9 mi away · 169 spots Among the most cited U-Gro Learning Centres
4170 Barrett Blvd, Ephrata · 6.3 mi away · 168 spots More citations than most Chesterbrook Academy
2408 Anita Ct, Leola · 6.3 mi away · 155 spots More citations than most Right at School at Paradise Elementary
20 N Belmont Rd, Paradise · 6.3 mi away About typical
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.