Primrose School of Peters Township
Primrose School of Peters Township is a certified child care center in Canonsburg, PA, with capacity for 189 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 10 times and confirmed violations in 2 complaint investigations. The state cited 72 violations, 15 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for health & medication (22 of 72). 15 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #10 of 20 centers in Canonsburg and has more citations per inspection than 81% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
On August 7, 2026 at approximately 10:55am, Certification Representative (CR) arrived at the facility for an unannounced visit. CR rang the bell, but no staff person was at the front desk or in the front office to answer. CR rang the bell an additional 8 times and knocked on the door before calling the facility's main number. There was no response to the door or phone. CR began ringing and knocking again for several minutes, with no response. During this time, CR Supervisor also called the facility's main number and an alternate number, with no answer or response. CR waited a total of twelve minutes before a staff person appeared in the front lobby, providing access to the facility.
In the Pre-K 1 room, an area of peeling paint (approximately 5 inches wide) was observed on the windowsill in the rear left of the room.
In the Pre-K 1 room, a play kitchen was observed to have a broken handle on its oven door.
In the Pre-K room, the wooden backing of the L-shaped work area in the rear left corner of the room was pulling away from the wall, creating a potential pinch point.
In the Infant 1 room, an infant was observed sleeping in a crib that did not have two feet of space on three sides.
The last two Mandated Reporter Trainings for Staff Person #1 were dated more than 60 months apart (8/19/2019 - 6/7/2025). (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file for Staff Person #2 contained PA State Police Clearances that were dated more than 60 months apart (6/11/2020 - 7/8/2025). (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
In the Pre-K 1 room, a cabinet in the rear of the room contained two cans of Xtra Care Shave Cream and eight Dab-o-Ink Bingo daubers, all of which were marked "Keep Out of Reach of Children." Staff indicated that these items were used for arts and crafts activities with the children.
The First Aid Kit in the Toddler 2 room did not contain soap.
In the Toddler 1 room, a play sink and stove located under the window was found not to be in good repair. Specifically, a long piece of the set separating the sink side from the stove side was loose, creating a potential hazard to children.
The file for Child #1, a pre-school aged child, included a recent Health Report which was more than 12 months old (dated 11/12/2024). (SEE LIST CODE SHEET)
The current health assessment on file for Staff Person #1 does not indicate that the staff person was examined for communicable disease.
The two most recent Pediatric First Aid and Pediatric CPR Trainings for Staff Person #3 were dated more than 24 months apart (1/21/2023 - 2/13/2025). (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The most recent staff evaluation on file for Staff Person #2 was dated more than 12 months ago (11/20/2024). (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #1 did not include information on the child's special needs; specifically, the portion of the form was not completed by the parent. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
The Financial Agreements and Emergency Contact Forms for Child #2 and Child #3 were dated more than six months apart. For both children, the updates were dated 2/21/2025 and 9/1/2025. (SEE LIS CODE SHEET)
Show 57 older citations
The most recent Child Abuse Clearances in the file for Staff Person #2 exceeded 60 months between clearances.
On 1/7/25, observed Child #1 sleeping in a bouncer in the Infant #1 Room.
The sink in the Infant #2 Room, which is currently being used by younger toddlers who can stand on their own, was not a proper height, nor was it easily approachable by means of a platform or steps.
The file for Child #4, a Young Toddler, did not include an updated health report conducted within the past 6 months.
The most recent health reports in the file for Child #7, a Preschool Child, exceeded 12 months between reports. The file for Child #3, an Older Toddler, did not include an updated health report conducted within the past 12 months.
Observed alcohol pads, which did not identify the name of the child for whom the medication was intended, in the first aid kits in the Infant #1 and Early Preschool #2 Rooms.
The most recent health assessments in the file for Staff Person #3 exceeded 24 months between assessments. The initial health assessment/TB Screening in the file for Staff Person #4 was conducted more than one year prior to the staff person's first day working in child care and is not valid (See LIS Code Sheet).
The files for Staff Person #7 and #8 contained foreign degrees which had not been transcribed/evaluated by a member of the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services (NACES) or the Association of International Credential Evaluators (AICE).
The most recent written evaluations in the files for #1, 3 and 5 exceeded 12 months between evaluations. The files for Staff Person #2 and 6 did not contain documentation of a written evaluation conducted within the past 12 months.
The emergency contact form in the file for Child #1, who has been enrolled for more than 6 months, has not been updated by the parent. The first parent update for the emergency contact form in the file for Child #2 was more than 6 months after the child's first day in care. The most recent parent updates for the emergency contact form in the file for Child #5 exceeded 6 months between updates. The most recent parent updates for the emergency contact forms and fee agreements in the files for Child #3, 6, 7 and 8 exceeded 6 months between updates.
** Based on interviews at the facility, on 4/10/24, staff #1 was scheduled to be done at 3:45PM. At approximately 4:00 PM, staff #1 took her 7 preschool age children out to staff #2, who was on the playground with 8 preschool age children. Staff #1 provided staff #2 with her identification cards so that she could supervise those children and then she left. This left staff #2 alone with 15 PS age children for approximately 20 minutes. On 4/11/24, it was observed that code orange was called 2 times over the facility intercom. Based on interviews at the facility, code orange notifies administration that the room is over ratio. On 4/11/24, at approximately 10:15 AM, Staff #2 was alone with 11 PS age children for approximately five minutes. On 4/11/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, staff #1 was alone with 12 PS age children for approximately 15 minutes.
* Based on interviews at the facility, on 4/10/24, staff #1 was scheduled to be done at 3:45PM. At approximately 4:00 PM, staff #1 took her 7 preschool age children out to staff #2, who was on the playground with 8 preschool age children. Staff #1 provided staff #2 with her identification cards so that she could supervise those children and then she left. This left staff #2 alone with 15 PS age children for approximately 20 minutes. On 4/11/24, it was observed that code orange was called 2 times over the facility intercom. Based on interviews at the facility, code orange notifies administration that the room is over ratio. On 4/11/24, at approximately 10:15 AM, Staff #2 was alone with 11 PS age children for approximately five minutes. On 4/11/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, staff #1 was alone with 12 PS age children for approximately 15 minutes.
*** Based on interviews at the facility, on 4/10/24, staff #1 was scheduled to be done at 3:45PM. At approximately 4:00 PM, staff #1 took her 7 preschool age children out to staff #2, who was on the playground with 8 preschool age children. Staff #1 provided staff #2 with her identification cards so that she could supervise those children and then she left. This left staff #2 alone with 15 PS age children for approximately 20 minutes. On 4/11/24, it was observed that code orange was called 2 times over the facility intercom. Based on interviews at the facility, code orange notifies administration that the room is over ratio. On 4/11/24, at approximately 10:15 AM, Staff #2 was alone with 11 PS age children for approximately five minutes. On 4/11/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, staff #1 was alone with 12 PS age children for approximately 15 minutes.
Based on staff interviews and observation of the preschool room, there are times that the preschool room which has a capacity of 19 is used for nap time and 20 cots have been in use in the room. The placement of the rest equipment does not allow for 2 feet of space on 3 sides as described at 3270.106(f).
One of the toilets in the EPS 1 room is not flushing.
On 4/11/24, observed 5 cots in the Toddler 1 room which were in use and did not have 2 feet of space on three sides.
Based on staff interviews, the most recent director is no longer employed by the facility and the facility has been without a director since approximately 4/5/24.
Based on interviews with staff, staff have been instructed that the children may not get off their mats during naptime to use the restroom and some of the children have wet their pants.
Based on staff interviews, the staff in the preschool room have been instructed to require the children to remain on their mats for 3 1/2 hours, even though they were finished with their naps so as to maintain compliance with nap ratios.
The rubber wall baseboard on the Early Learning PS 2 room was pulled off by the bathroom wall.
There was urine in the boy's bathroom toilet in the Pre- K 1 room. There was toilet paper on the floor in the girl's bathroom in the Pre -K 1 room.
There was a cracked bin and a cracked toy cup in the PS 1 room. There was a red cracked bin in the Infant 2 room. There was a clear cracked bin in the Toddler 1 room.
There was a highchair with missing straps in the infant 1 room.
The file for child # 3 a preschooler lacked an updated Health Report. The previous report is dated. 9/9/22. The file for child # 5 a preschooler lacked an updated Health Report. The previous report is dated. 9/1/22.
The Solus Cortel medication for child #7 lacked the original container.
The EPI Pen for child # 6 was expired. The medication expiration date was 12/22/23.
Staff # 3 kept a soiled diaper on the changing table until she was done with the diaper change, instead of discarding it immediately into a plastic-lined, hands-free covered can.
The file for staff #2 contained a current health assessment dated 8/17/23. It was not obtained within 24 months of the previous assessment dated 5/21/21.
The file for child # 1contained a current health report that was obtained after 60 days following the first day of attendance at the facility. The child start date was 5/10/23 and the health report was dated 7/14/23. The file for child # 2 a preschooler lacked initial health report. The child has been in care longer than 60 days. start date 5/8/23. The file for child # 4 contained a current health report that was obtained after 60 days following the first day of attendance at the facility. The child start date was 6/20/23 and the health report was dated 10/31/23.
The file for staff #1 lacked the one-hour updated health and safety training course, Pennsylvania Health and Safety Update 2022 by the deadline of 12/30/22.
The emergency contact form for child #1 was not present in the Pathway room where the child was receiving care.
Per staff statements, on 6/23/23, Child #1 was unintentionally left alone, asleep in a crib in Infant Room I for approximately 15 minutes at the end of the day when the staff in the room transitioned to Infant Room II.
Per staff statements, on 6/23/23, Child #1 was unintentionally left alone, asleep in a crib in Infant Room I for approximately 15 minutes at the end of the day when the staff in the room transitioned to Infant Room II.
Per staff statements, on 6/23/23, Child #1 was unintentionally left alone, asleep in a crib in Infant Room I for approximately 15 minutes at the end of the day when the staff in the room transitioned to Infant Room II.
*Per staff statements, on 6/23/23, Child #1 was unintentionally left alone, asleep in a crib in Infant Room I for approximately 15 minutes at the end of the day when the staff in the room transitioned to Infant Room II.
**Per staff statements, on 6/23/23, Child #1 was unintentionally left alone, asleep in a crib in Infant Room I for approximately 15 minutes at the end of the day when the staff in the room transitioned to Infant Room II.
An Epinephrine Injection Pen, for a child in the Infant 2 Room, expired on 12/22.
The two most recent Health Assessments in the file for Staff #1 exceeded the 24-month renewal requirement.
Based on a conversation with the provider, information was not provided to parents of each enrolled child, on how to access the regulations electronically.
The files for Staff #6 and #10 lacked NSOR applications and contained NSOR clearances dated after the first day of employment in child care positions.
During assessment of supervision and ratio in the PK 2 Room at 11:10 AM on 2/9/22, Staff #5 named 8 PS and Staff #12 named 6 PS. There were 15 children in the room at this time. When asked to name their groups again, Staff #5 named 9 PS and Staff #12 named 5 PS. Again, there were still 15 children in the room at this time.
The boys' toilet in the PK 1 Room was observed to lack a handwashing sign.
The file for Child #5 contained consecutive health reports dated more than 6 months apart.
The files for Child #2 and #3 contained records of immunization history which lacked current influenza vaccinations.
During described and observed diaper changes in the Infant, Tod 1 and Tod 2 Rooms, staff left the soiled diaper on the changer until completing the diaper change.
The files for Staff #1 and #9 contained consecutive health assessments dated more than 24 months apart.
The file for Staff #11 contained a health assessment which lacked an indication that a physical examination was conducted.
The observed emergency plan lacked accommodations for children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions.
Documentation of fire detection system testing contained dates of testing more than 30 days apart.
The files for Child #1 and #6 contained initial health reports dated more than 60 days after the enrollment date.
Notification of the location of the facility and program's use of pedestrian and vehicular routes around the child care facility.to local traffic safety authorities was not available at the time of inspection.
The files for Child #5 and #7 contained emergency contact forms which lacked the work telephone numbers for the enrolling parents.
The file for Child #1and #4 contained consecutive updates to the emergency contact form which were dated more than 6 months apart.
The files for Staff #3, #4, #7 and #8 contained documentation of certification in first-aid and CPR which were not listed as pediatric. The file for Staff #5 contained documentation of certification in CPR which was not listed as pediatric and lacked documentation of certification in pediatric first-aid.
The file for Staff #3 contained 7 of the 12 required training hours between 12/19/20 and 12/19/21.
During assessment of ratio and supervision on 1/10/22 at 9:00 AM in the Early PS Room, Staff #1 named 5 OT and Staff #2 named 4 OT. There were 10 children in the room at this time. When asked to re-name their supervisory groups, Staff #1 and #2 named the same children. When asked who was responsible for the unnamed child, staff realized who was missed and Staff #2 claimed that child in her group.
Staff #1, a provisional hire whose file lacked a completed FBI and NSOR clearance, was observed working with children unsupervised on 12/17/21.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
About this center
Common questions
Has Primrose School of Peters Township had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 15 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jan 23, 2026 (background checks): “The last two Mandated Reporter Trainings for Staff Person #1 were dated more than 60 months apart (8/19/2019 - 6/7/2025). (SEE LIS CODE SHEET) The file for Staff Person #2 contained PA State Police Clearances that were…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Primrose School of Peters Township?
Pennsylvania lists 2 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Primrose School of Peters Township’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Apr 24, 2019. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Primrose School of Peters Township compare with other daycares in Canonsburg?
It is #10 of 20 centers in Canonsburg by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 81% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Primrose School of Peters Township last inspected?
Aug 7, 2026 (unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
Who runs Primrose School of Peters Township?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Pertalian LLC.
Certified centers nearby
3075 Washington Rd, Canonsburg · 0.9 mi away · 74 spots More citations than most Extended Day Services LLC-Pleasant Valley Elem
250 E McMurray Rd, Canonsburg · 1.0 mi away Fewer citations than most Kids Unlimited Child Development Corporation
2603 Washington Rd Ste 1, Canonsburg · 1.2 mi away · 65 spots Among the most cited McMurrays Best After School Program & Summer Camp
2510 Washington Rd, Canonsburg · 1.6 mi away · 40 spots More citations than most Bubbles Bears to Books
2500 Washington Rd, Canonsburg · 1.6 mi away · 183 spots Among the most cited Kid Biz/South Hills
3540 Washington Rd, Canonsburg · 1.7 mi away · 109 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.