Skys the Limit Learning Center Program · 1410 N Franklin St, Pittsburgh
Skys the Limit Learning Center Program is a certified child care center in Pittsburgh, PA, with capacity for 39 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 5 times and confirmed violations in 1 complaint investigation. The state cited 56 violations, 4 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for records & paperwork (27 of 56). 23 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #168 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh and has more citations per inspection than 90% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
SECOND CITATION: The file for Staff #1, observed providing childcare, lacked complete and/or requests for National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) Verification and Child Abuse Clearances. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The files for Staff #1 lacked a Health Assessment. Staff #1 was observed to be providing childcare. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The Agreements in the files for Child #1, #2, and #3 lacked the amount of the fee to be charged. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The Agreement in the file for Child #3 lacked the date of the child's admission. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The emergency contact form for Child #4 lacked the telephone number of the child's physician. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The emergency contact form for Child #4 lacked the enrolling parents work address and work phone number. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The emergency contact form in the file for Child #4 lacked written consent signed by a parent for emergency medical care. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The emergency contact form for Child #4 lacked signed parental consent for administration of minor first-aid procedures by facility staff. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The files for Staff 1 and #2 lacked proof of qualifications for education in the form of a diploma, transcript, or letter signed by a representative or the experiential, educational or training entity. Previously cited 10/21/25.
SECOND CITATION: The file for Staff #1, lacked two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the suitability to serve as a facility person. Previously cited 10/21/25.
The file for Staff #1, observed providing childcare, lacked complete and/or requests for PA State Police Clearances and FBI Clearance, National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) Verification, Child Abuse Clearance, and Disclosure Statement as there was no record presented for Staff #1. The file for Staff #2 lacked a National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) Verification and obtained a PA State Police Clearance after first day caring for children with no request in the file for Staff #2.
In Room 3, the closet with washer and dryer located inside the classroom was open and had bottles of Downy Light, Purex and All Detergent that were labeled "keep out of reach of children" and were on the floor in the closet and were accessible to children.
In the outdoor play space, the green outdoor carpet that was covering the ground was observed to be loose and creating a tripping hazard to children in care. In the outdoor play space, five green fence posts that were short enough to be accessible to the children in care were observed to have sharp edges which posed a cutting hazard.
In Room 2, there was peeling paint in one area on back red wall below window and in Room 4, a couple areas of peeling paint on back yellow wall. In downstairs men's bathroom, there was peeling paint in one area near baseboard.
In Room 1 multiple cardboard blocks were observed to be ripped and not in good repair.
The files for Staff #1 lacked a Health Assessment. Staff #1 was observed to be providing childcare.
The file for Staff #1 lacked the results of a tuberculin skin test, x-ray or other medical documentation necessary to confirm freedom from communicable tuberculosis. Staff #1 was observed to be providing childcare.
The Agreements in the files for Child #1, #2, and #3 lacked the amount of the fee to be charged.
The files for Child #1, #2, #3, and #4, whom have been enrolled for more than six months, lacked child service forms that provide information to the family about the child's growth and development in the context of the services being provided.
The Agreement in the file for Child #3 lacked the date of the child's admission.
The file for Child #3 lacked an emergency contact form including the information of who shall be contacted in an emergency.
The emergency contact form for Child #4 lacked the telephone number of the child's physician.
The emergency contact form for Child #4 lacked the enrolling parents work address and work phone number.
The emergency contact form in the file for Child #4 lacked written consent signed by a parent for emergency medical care.
Th emergency transportation plan was not posted in Room #1, #2, #3, and #4.
The files for Child #1, #2, #3, and #4 contained emergency contact forms that had not been updated within the last 6 months.
The files for Child #1, #2, #3, and #4 contained Agreements that had not been updated within the last 6 months.
The emergency contact form for Child #4 lacked signed parental consent for administration of minor first-aid procedures by facility staff.
There was no individual record provided for Staff #1 who was observed providing care for children.
The address and telephone number of Staff #1 was not present at the facility.
Verification of age for Staff #1was not present at the facility.
The file for Staff #2 lacked proof of qualifications for education in the form of a diploma, transcript, or letter signed by a representative or the experiential, educational or training entity. Due to Staff #1 not having a file, the proof of qualifications for education in the form of a diploma, transcript, or letter signed by a representative or the experiential, educational or training entity could not be verified.
The file for Staff #2, lacked two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the suitability to serve as a facility person. Staff #1 lacked a file and therefore, lacked the required two written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the suitability of Staff #1 to serve as a facility person.
Show 33 older citations
The file for Staff #2 lacked a signed disclosure statement.
Staff #1, qualified to be an Aide, was observed to be unsupervised, caring for children in Room 1.
At 11:15 AM Staff #1 an Aide, was observed alone in Room 1. At that time, Staff #1 stated they were responsible for the 1 Infant, 1 Young Toddler, 2 Older Toddlers, and 1 Preschool Age child in Room 1.
Staff person #1 transported an older toddler without another staff person in the vehicle.
The file for Staff #2, holding the title of Assistant Group Supervisor, included proof of high school diploma, but did not include 2500 hours of experience.
In Room 1, Clorox Wipes and Hand sanitizer, labeled "keep out of the reach of children", was on a low table and accessible to children in care.
Observed a can of shaving cream, labeled keep out of the reach of children, in Room 4 with the other art/craft supplies. Staff stated they had used it for sensory activities.
Observed four windows on the second floor that were accessible to children and were not modified to limit the opening to 6 inches or fewer.
Room 1 lacked the telephone numbers of the nearest hospital, police department, fire department, ambulance and poison control center posted by the telephone.
In Room 3 there was a cracked plastic bin creating a pinching hazard to the children in care.
The file for Child #5, enrolled for more that 60 days at the facility, did not contain documentation of a 4th dose of the Pneumococcal vaccination, 1st dose of MMR vaccination, 1st dose of Varicella vaccination, and 2nd dose of the Hep A vaccination as required based on the child's age as per the ACIP recommended schedule.
The Health Report for Child #3 lacked a statement indicating the child is able to participate in childcare and appears to be free from contagious or communicable disease.
The file for Child #5, enrolled for more than 60 days lacked an initial health report.
The Agreements for Child #2 and #5 lacked the amount of the fee to be charged.
The file for Child #1 contained an Agreement which did not specify the child's arrival and departure times.
The Agreements for Child #2 and #3 lacked the date of the child's admission.
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #1 lacked the name of the child's physician. The Emergency Contact Form for Child #4 lacked the name, address, and phone number of the child's physician.
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #4 lacked the enrolling parents work address and telephone number.
The Emergency Contact Form in the file for Child #4 lacked written consent signed by a parent for emergency medical care.
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #1 lacked the health insurance coverage and policy number for the child.
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #4 lacked the address of the individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
Room 1, Room 2, Room 3, and Room 4 lacked a written plan identifying the means of transporting a child to emergency care and staffing provisions in the event of an emergency.
The Emergency Contact Form for Child #4 lacked signed parental consent for administration of minor first-aid procedures by facility staff.
The file for Staff #1 lacked valid proof of education.
Observed two bags of play sand labeled, "Keep out of Reach of Children, that were on the ground in the outdoor play space.
Observed four windows on the second floor that were accessible to children and were not modified to limit the opening to 6 inches or fewer.
The first aid kit located in Room 1 lacked soap.
In Room 1 there was an electrical cord running along the floor from the electrical outlet to the dehumidifier that posed a tripping hazard to the children in care.
In Room 1 along the front wall near the gate was peeling yellow paint. On the top of the railing on the outdoor steps there was flaking red paint.
The child sized table in Room 2 was very wobbly and created a toppling hazard for the children in care. The Grocery Store equipment in Room 3 had a screw that was sticking out and posed a scratching hazard to the children in care.
Observed two metal rings and two zip ties that were in a pack n play in Room 1, posing a choking hazard to the children who are still placing items in their mouths.
The Emergency Plan lacked plans for accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities and children with chronic medical conditions.
The facility's emergency plan did not provide details regarding sheltering in place at the facility.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $75.00 | $70.00 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $72.00 | $69.00 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $70.00 | $66.00 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $70.00 | $66.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $60.00 | $37.00 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $60.00 | $37.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has Skys the Limit Learning Center Program had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 4 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Oct 21, 2025 (background checks): “The file for Staff #1, observed providing childcare, lacked complete and/or requests for PA State Police Clearances and FBI Clearance, National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) Verification, Child Abuse Clearance, and…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Skys the Limit Learning Center Program?
Pennsylvania lists 1 complaint investigation since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Skys the Limit Learning Center Program’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4, effective Aug 14, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Skys the Limit Learning Center Program compare with other daycares in Pittsburgh?
It is tied for #168 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 90% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Skys the Limit Learning Center Program last inspected?
Dec 12, 2025 (unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does Skys the Limit Learning Center Program cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $75.00 for infant, $72.00 for young toddler, $70.00 for older toddler, $70.00 for preschool in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs Skys the Limit Learning Center Program?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Skys The Limit Learning Center Program.
Certified centers nearby
1214 Liverpool St, Pittsburgh · 0.2 mi away · 373 spots Among the most cited Family Resources Therapeutic Preschool
1300 Western Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.4 mi away · 58 spots About typical YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh/Allegheny CDC
600 W North Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.8 mi away Among the most cited Project Destiny Early LRNG CTR at Ccac/Byers Hall
901 Ridge Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.8 mi away · 29 spots Among the most cited Akneka Sharika Wee Care
2809 Brighton Rd, Pittsburgh · 1.0 mi away · 62 spots Among the most cited Akneka Sharika Wee Care
3004 Stayton St, Pittsburgh · 1.1 mi away · 42 spots More citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.