ST John Neumann School for Children and Families
ST John Neumann School for Children and Families is a certified child care center in Columbia, PA, with capacity for 140 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 2 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times and confirmed violations in 4 complaint investigations. The state cited 36 violations, 6 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for training & qualifications (9 of 36). 6 citations came in the last 12 months, including 2 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #58 of 144 centers in Lancaster County and has more citations per inspection than 51% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
Staff persons #1 and #2 reported that staff in the Blooms classroom have been heard and observed speaking to both children and parents in different manners which is described as a favoring or not favoring manner. Staff person #1 and #2 singled out families/children when this occurred.
Staff persons #1 and #2 reported that they have observed and heard staff in the Blooms classroom use harsh language with the children, such as "You need to..." or "You can't until..."
On 7/21/26, staff person #2, self-reported that the class was lining up to walk back from the park. Child #1 did not want to hold the rope where they were assigned and was resisting leaving the park. Staff #1 grabbed child #1 and held them while they resisted to get them back from the park. Child #1 sustained scratches from staff #1 during this interaction.
In the Buds classroom, a package of diaper wipes labeled "Keep out of reach of children" was observed on a bench in the bathroom, accessible to children. Corrected on site by moving the wipes out of reach of children.
Documentation showing that fire safety training was completed within 12 months of previous completion was not available for Staff #1, as evidenced by the most recent completion date of 1/8/25. Documentation showing that fire safety training was completed within 12 months of previous completion was not available for Staff #2, as evidenced by the most recent completion date of 1/26/25. Documentation showing that fire safety training was completed within 12 months of previous completion was not available for Staff #3, as evidenced by the most recent completion date of 1/29/25. Documentation showing that fire safety training was completed within 12 months of previous completion was not available for Staff #4, as evidenced by the most recent completion date of 2/5/26 and a previous date of 1/9/25. Documentation showing that fire safety training was completed within 12 months of previous completion was not available for Staff #5, as evidenced by the most recent completion date of 1/16/25.
Documentation showed that Staff #2 obtained 8 hours of professional development training during the period of June 2024/June 2025. Corrected with the first 4 hours of training completed in the 2025/26 period. Documentation showed that Staff #3 obtained 9 hours of professional development training during the period of November 2024/November 2025. Corrected with the first 3 hours obtained in the 2025-26 period.
At the time of the inspection, a signature from a physician, physician's assistant or a CRNP was not available on the health assessment for Child #4.
At the time of the paperwork review, documentation that the annual letter to the local traffic authorities was sent in 2024 was not available. The letter was sent 2/17/25, but not prior to that date.
Staff #1 had not completed mandated reporter training within the 60-month requirement. Documentation shows that the current mandated reporter training was completed on 12/10/24 and the previous training was completed on 10/31/19, exceeding the 60-month requirement.
At the time of the inspection, addresses for designated release individuals were not available for Child #1, Child #2, and Child #3. CORRECTED ON SITE for child #1 and child #3.
Show 26 older citations
At the time of the inspection, emergency contact forms located in the child care spaces did not contain addresses of emergency release persons. a proprietary emergency form was being used that did not contain a field for this information.
Observed staff person #1 caring for a group of 4 young toddlers in the Sprout classroom unsupervised by a staff person qualified at a minimum as an assistant group supervisor.
The operator did not contact the central regional office within 24 hours of a child in care at the facility receiving emergency room treatment. The incident occurred on 07/26/2024 and the Central Regional office was not notified until 07/29/2024.
The operator did not mail or deliver a written report to the Central Regional office within 72 hours after emergency room treatment of a child in care. The incident occurred on 07/26/2024 and a copy of the incident report was not emailed to the Central Regional office until 07/29/2024.
The director or designated staff person did not ensure a manual test of the fire detection system is completed at least once every 30 days. The fire detection system is used at least every 60 days during fire drills and an annual inspection report dated 02/20/2024 was on file in lieu of testing every 30 days.
Observed staff person #1 caring for children in the young toddler (Sprouts) classroom as an AGS. The file for staff person #1 included a foreign degree which was not evaluated for equivalency.
The file for staff person #2 did not include documentation of a High School Diploma prior to service at the facility (see LIS code sheet); the file included a Child Development Certificate in lieu of a High School Diploma.
Per the direct statements of Staff Person #2, it was directly witnessed that Staff Person #1 did use multiple and frequent verbal gestures/tones toward children that would be characterized as harsh and/or demeaning. Further, Staff Person #3 indicated that as part of their facility investigation, it was found that Staff Person #1 did act in a manner that was inappropriate with children and was terminated on 4.26.24.
Staff #1 had a state police clearance dated 2/12/24, which was not complete within 45 days of initial employment. State Police Clearance for staff #1 is now on file. Staff #6 had a state police clearance dated 2/12/14, which was not complete within 45 days of initial employment. State Police clearance for staff #6 is now on file. State Police Clearance for staff #12 was dated 2/12/24, which was not complete within 45 days of initial employment. State Police clearance for staff #12 is now on file. Staff #13 was observed to need Maryland clearances. Maryland Clearances were not on file. Staff #13 may not work in a child care position until out of state clearances are obtained. State Police clearance for staff #14 was dated 2/12/24, which was not complete within 45 days of initial employment. State Police clearance for staff #14 is now on file. Staff #15 did not have a complete state police clearance on file. Staff #15 had a receipt of application for the state police clearance on file but was missing the clearance. Corrected on site by obtaining the clearance. Staff #15 was missing an NSOR clearance on file. Staff #15 may not work in a child care position until the clearance is…
Emergency Plan on file did not address continuity of operations in the event that an emergency had occurred.
The Emergency Plan parent letter was missing a method for facility persons to contact parents when an emergency situation arises.
The Emergency Plan parent letter was missing a method for facility persons to inform parents that the emergency has ended and to provide instruction as to how parents can safely be reunited with their children.
Medication log for child #1 and child #2 was missing the dates for administration.
Staff #4 had a health assessment dated 6/16/21 and updated on 12/15/23, which is greater than 24 months. Staff #5 had a health assessment dated 2/26/24 and did not have a previous health assessment on file.
Emergency Plan parent letter on file did not provide for accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions.
Fire drills were conducted greater than 60 days apart on the following occasions: 2/16/23 and again on 8/1/23. 8/1/23 and again on 12/22/23
Emergency plan on file was not sent to the local municipality.
Staff person #10 had CPR dated 3/24/21 and updated on 10/10/23, which is greater than 24 months.
Staff person #2 completed health and safety training on 11/24/23, which is greater than 90 days from employment. Health and Safety training is now complete and on file.
File for staff #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #12, #14, #16, and #17 was missing verification of previous experience.
File for staff # 5 was missing 2 written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person. File for staff #11 was missing 1 written, nonfamily reference from an individual attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person. File for staff #12 was missing 2 written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person. File for staff #14 was missing 2 written, nonfamily references from individuals attesting to the person's suitability to serve as a facility person.
Staff person #12 completed Pediatric CPR/First Aid on 1/8/24, which is greater than 90 days from hire. Pediatric CPR/First Aid is now on file for staff #12.
On 7/18/23, staff person #1 struck child #1 on the hand as a form of discipline.
Fire drill was completed on 2/16/23 and was not completed again since that date.
Staff person #1 did not have approved pediatric CPR/First Aide on file. CPR/First aide on file was not an approved, pediatric curriculum.
Staff #1 and 2 did not obtain Pediatric CPR/First Aide within 90 days of employment. Both staff obtained training on 8/24/22
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
About this center
Common questions
Has ST John Neumann School for Children and Families had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 6 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Aug 3, 2026 (caregiver conduct): “Staff persons #1 and #2 reported that staff in the Blooms classroom have been heard and observed speaking to both children and parents in different manners which is described as a favoring or not favoring manner. Staff…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about ST John Neumann School for Children and Families?
Pennsylvania lists 4 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is ST John Neumann School for Children and Families’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 2, effective Jan 5, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does ST John Neumann School for Children and Families compare with other daycares in Lancaster County?
It is tied for #58 of 144 centers in Lancaster County by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 51% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was ST John Neumann School for Children and Families last inspected?
Feb 27, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
Who runs ST John Neumann School for Children and Families?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Chi ST Joseph Childrens Health.
Certified centers nearby
50 S 6th St, Columbia · 0.2 mi away More citations than most Little People Day Care School of Columbia
780 Chickies Hill Rd, Columbia · 1.0 mi away · 103 spots About typical Wrightsville Elementary School
320 Chestnut St, Wrightsville · 1.7 mi away No citations K-Prep Learning Center
3943 Columbia Ave, Columbia · 2.8 mi away · 72 spots About typical Steps to Success Donegal Intermediate
1177 River Rd, Marietta · 3.1 mi away Fewer citations than most Susquehanna Waldorf School
15 W Walnut St, Marietta · 3.3 mi away · 19 spots More citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.