Susquehanna Waldorf School is a certified child care center in Marietta, PA, with capacity for 19 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 1 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 5 times. The state cited 39 violations, 2 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for records & paperwork (14 of 39). 7 citations came in the last 12 months. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #4 of 5 centers in Marietta and has more citations per inspection than 77% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
A statement covering the continuity of operations in the emergency plan was not available.
During the inspection, the following plants were observed in the child care environment: pothos, begonia, aloe, amaryllis. Each plant is described as toxic or as having toxic parts.
During the inspection, children were observed to eat snack without handwashing prior to eating.
During the inspection, teachers were observed serving and eating food without washing their hands.
Documentation submitted showed the school's daytime fire drills. Documentation showing fire drills conducted by the after-care program was not available.
Staff person #1 had not completed Pediatric first aid and CPR training on or before expiration of the most recent certification. This is evidenced by the previously documented Pediatric first aid and CPR training on file that expired 8/24/23. The current CPR certificate is dated 9/6/2025.
At the time of inspection, the emergency transportation plan was not available.
At the time of inspection, hot water in the boys and girls bathrooms was observed to be 112 degrees F.
At the time of inspection, documentation of out-of-state (VA) criminal record and sex offender clearances for staff #2 was not available. Staff #2 is beyond the 45-day provisional hiring period.
During the inspection, a classroom stove was being used to bake bread for snack. The stove is in an area accessible to children.
Show 29 older citations
At the time of inspection, the parent letter describing emergency procedures was not available.
At the time of inspection, disinfecting wipes were observed to be stored in a bathroom space on a counter that was accessible to children. CORRECTED ON SITE.
During the inspection, English Ivy and Ornamental Boxwood plants were observed to be on the playground, accessible to children.
At the time of inspection, the rug in the stairwell in from of the exit door to the playground was observed to be lifting up, causing a tripping hazard.
At the time of inspection, documentation showed that Staff #1 had a health assessment on file dated 7/23/24, which was beyond the 24-month requirement for health assessment updates. The previous health assessment is dated 6/24/21. Staff #3 had a health assessment dated 11/21/24 with a previous health assessment dated 10/20/22, exceeding the 24-month requirement.
At the time of inspection, accommodations for infants, toddlers, children with disabilities, and children with chronic medical conditions were not available in the emergency plan.
At the time of inspection, documentation that the emergency plan had been sent to the county EMA was not available.
At the time of inspection, documentation of child service reports conducted every 6 months was not available for child #4 and child #5. The most recent CSR was completed in November 2024 for both children with no documentation of a previous report being created, which was required based on their enrollment dates.
At the time of inspection, documentation of work address and phone number for the enrolling parent of child #5 was not available.
At the time of inspection, signed parental consent for emergency medical care was not available for child #3 and child #5. Initials were used to signify consent for child #4, which is not acceptable.
At the time of inspection, proprietary emergency information cards were available in the classrooms, however, these forms did not include fields for parent workplace, workplace address/phone number, persons to whom the child may be released, and addresses for those individuals.
At the time of inspection, documentation of parental review of the agreement every 6 months was not available for Child #4 and Child #5.
At the time of inspection, signed parental consent for minor first aid was not available for child #3 and child #5. Initials were used to indicate consent for first aid, transportation, walking excursions, wading, and swimming, which is not acceptable.
Emergency Plan on file did not provide for a method for facility persons to contact parents when an emergency situation arises.
Emergency Plan on file did not list the method to inform parents that an emergency has ended.
Health report for child #1 indicated that the child was not free from contagious or communicable disease and not cleared to participate in child care.
Immunization exemption on file for child #5 was observed to be a form letter, which was not written by the parent.
Emergency Plan on file did not provide accommodations for evacuation of children from the facility to a new location away from the facility premises.
Emergency contact form on file did not list a section to provide a parent work, and work address. Parent work address was missing for child #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5
Emergency contact form for child #5 did not list a complete address for persons to whom the child may be released.
On the facility's emergency contact form, there was no section for parents to give the facility consent to administer medication or special dietary restrictions. Child #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 did not have consent for administration of medication or special dietary needs on file.
Staff number 1 required out of state clearances and clearances were not on file at the time of inspection. Out of state clearances for staff #1 obtained on 2/3/23. Staff #1 did not have an approved FBI clearance on file at the time of inspection. FBI clearance obtained on 1/23/23, which was after initial employment. Staff #1 did not have an NSOR clearance on file at the time of inspection. NSOR clearance was obtained on 1/22/23, which was completed after initial employment. Staff number 1 had Mandated Reporter training dated 1/29/23, which was done greater than 90 from employment.
Child #4 was missing an immunization that is recommended by the ACIP. There was no exemption of immunization letter on file for child #4.
Health assessment for staff number 1 was dated 1/30/23, which was not completed before initial employment. TB screening for staff 1 was dated 1/30/23, which was not completed before initial employment. There was no health assessment or TB screening on file for staff #2.
Staff #1 had a TB screening dated 1/30/23, which was not done at initial employment. Staff #2 did not have a TB screening on file.
Emergency Contact form for child number 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 did not have the parent work address or parent work phone number listed.
For child number 3, release persons were listed on agreement form, however release persons, addresses and phone numbers for release persons were not listed on emergency contact form. Emergency contact form for child number 5 did not contain complete addresses for release persons. Addresses on file for release persons were missing the state and zip code.
Staff number 2 did not have verification of education or experience on file.
Staff #2 did not have two written, nonfamily references on file.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
About this center
Common questions
Has Susquehanna Waldorf School had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 2 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jan 31, 2025 (background checks): “At the time of inspection, documentation of out-of-state (VA) criminal record and sex offender clearances for staff #2 was not available. Staff #2 is beyond the 45-day provisional hiring period.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Susquehanna Waldorf School?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at Susquehanna Waldorf School since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Susquehanna Waldorf School’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 1, effective Aug 1, 2019. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Susquehanna Waldorf School compare with other daycares in Marietta?
It is #4 of 5 centers in Marietta by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 77% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Susquehanna Waldorf School last inspected?
Jan 14, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
Who runs Susquehanna Waldorf School?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Susquehanna Waldorf School.
Certified centers nearby
45 W Walnut St, Marietta · under 0.1 mi away · 23 spots Among the most cited Steps to Success Donegal Intermediate
1177 River Rd, Marietta · 0.6 mi away Fewer citations than most Kinderhook Early Learning Center LLC
420 Coffee Goss Rd, Marietta · 0.9 mi away · 141 spots More citations than most Little People Day Care School of Columbia
780 Chickies Hill Rd, Columbia · 2.3 mi away · 103 spots About typical Wrightsville Elementary School
320 Chestnut St, Wrightsville · 2.6 mi away No citations ST John Neumann School for Children and Families
401 Locust St, Columbia · 3.3 mi away · 140 spots About typical
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.