Kindercare Learning Center

Based on LPA’s interviews and record review of the incident, S1 admitted they did say a curse word in the presence of C1, which poses a potential health risk to the children in care.

Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that, Child 1 (C1) and Child 5 (C5) did not have TB results on file, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that, facility was out of ratio in Toddler Room B on 6/13/2025, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that, facility did not call or fax the Department regarding the unusual incident for facility ratio, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 19 out of 19 infantc in care, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. The LPA observed sleep log pages for June and July that were empty. Staff 4 stated they only keep track sleeping time (begin and end times).

Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 5 staff present, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. Staff 5 did not have a health screening in file. S5 attempted to obtain one from the doctor, but was unable to provide while the LPA was still present.

Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 5 staff present, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. The LPA observed no mandated reporter in file. When LPA asked the director for S5's certificate, the director stated S5 does not have one.

Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in1 out of 5 children files checked during the inspection, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. The LPA observed no LIC9227 for C2. LPA inquired with the director, the director stated C2 had not LIC9227. C2 is over 1 year old but started at the day care before age 1. Therefore, an LIC9227 is/was required.

Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the above regulation in 1 out of 10 infants enrolled, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of clients in care. The director and S3 stated the incident happened and had been corrected.

101700.3 California Lead Action Level at Child Care Centers (b) Testing results with fractional ppb readings of 5.0 ppb or greater shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number, before comparing to the Action Level. (1) A result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. 1 LPA observed Site ID P located inside Toddler A Classroom had the faucet portion removed. Facility provides filtered water through Brita water pitchers for children in care. Based on lab report analysis water from outlet P (6.400 parts per billion) taken on 9/17/2022 indicated levels of lead in exceedance. 8

Based on interview and record review, the Director did not comply with the section cited above in 16 out of 17 staff's training requirements which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.