UPMC Passavant Childrens House
UPMC Passavant Childrens House is a certified child care center in Pittsburgh, PA, with capacity for 128 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 (accredited) rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 8 times. The state cited 42 violations, 14 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). 8 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #78 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh and has more citations per inspection than 68% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The staff file for Staff person #1 was observed to contain a current National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) check dated 7/10/26 which was not obtained prior to first day working with children (See IS CODE SHEET) as required under the Child Protective Service Law (CPSL.)
In the PreK Room, a travel sized hand sanitizer was observed attached to a child's jacket that was hanging approximately a foot and a half from the floor in a cubby allowing it to be accessible to the preschool age children in care.
The child file for Child #2, who is a preschool age child, was observed to contain an updated health report dated 1/6/25 which was conducted more than 12 months from the previously dated 10/31/24 health report on file.
The staff file for Staff person #4 was observed to contain fire safety trainings that were conducted more than 12 months apart; those fire safety trainings are dated 12/24/25 and 10/9/24.
The staff file for Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 contained a current staff evaluation dated Dec. 2025 which was not completed at least once every 12 months from the previous staff evaluation on file dated Nov. 2024.
The staff file for Staff person #3 who is functioning as an Assistant Group Supervisor, lacked proof of education.
The child file for Child #1 contained a current financial agreement for that lacked the operator's signature.
The child file for Child #2 contained a current emergency contact form that was not reviewed and signed by the parent at least once every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the emergency contact form were signed on 1/5/26 and 6/5/25. The child file for Child #3 contained a current emergency contact form that was not reviewed and signed by the parent at least once every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the emergency contact form were signed on 12/15/25 and 5/12/25. The child file for Child #4 contained a current emergency contact form that was not reviewed and signed by the parent at least once every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the emergency contact form were signed on 12/19/25 and 5/4/25. The child file for Child #5 contained a current emergency contact form that was not reviewed and signed by the parent at least once every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the emergency contact form were signed on 12/16/25 and 1/2/25.
In the Gym, one ceiling tile located on the left side of the room nearest the built in shelving unit was observed to not be kept clean as evidence by having a water spot from a previous leak. In the hallway outside of the Toddler 2 Room one ceiling tile was observed to not be kept clean as evidence by having a water spot from a previous leak.
The staff file for Staff person #1, who is functioning as an assistant group supervisor, contained a foreign diploma that lacked additional documentation to show that the diploma had been evaluated to determine its validity and whether or not it meets qualifications for the position.
Show 32 older citations
The last two reviews of the facility emergency plan were not completed annually; those reviews were dated 8/21/23 and 11/16/24.
The child file for Child #1, who is a preschool age child, was observed to contain an updated health report dated 1/8/25 which was conducted more than 12 months from the previously dated 12/27/23 health report on file. The child file for Child #2, who is a preschool age child, was observed to contain an updated health report dated 11/1/24 which was conducted more than 12 months from the previously dated 10/30/23 health report on file.
The most recent emergency drill documented at the facility dated 8/7/24 was observed to lack mention of special accommodation used for any category of children and problems/observations encountered during the drill.
*In the Preschool Room, at approximately 10:30am, two staff and 16 preschool age children were observed. During the onset of supervision and ratio, Staff person #1 identified and named 8 preschool aged children and Staff person #2 identified and named 7 preschool aged children thus leaving 1 child unaccounted for. Staff were again asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for; Staff person #1 identified and named 8 preschool aged children and Staff person #2 identified and named 7 preschool aged children thus still leaving 1 child unaccounted for.
***In the Preschool Room, at approximately 10:30am, two staff and 16 preschool age children were observed. During the onset of supervision and ratio, Staff person #1 identified and named 8 preschool aged children and Staff person #2 identified and named 7 preschool aged children thus leaving 1 child unaccounted for. Staff were again asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for; Staff person #1 identified and named 8 preschool aged children and Staff person #2 identified and named 7 preschool aged children thus still leaving 1 child unaccounted for.
**In the Preschool Room, at approximately 10:30am, two staff and 16 preschool age children were observed. During the onset of supervision and ratio, Staff person #1 identified and named 8 preschool aged children and Staff person #2 identified and named 7 preschool aged children thus leaving 1 child unaccounted for. Staff were again asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for; Staff person #1 identified and named 8 preschool aged children and Staff person #2 identified and named 7 preschool aged children thus still leaving 1 child unaccounted for.
In Kindergarten Prep Room a stapler was observed on a table and accessible to children in care. In the School Age Room a stapler was observed stored on an arts and crafts wood shelving unit and accessible to children in care.
The staff file for Staff person #3 contained a current National Sex Offender Registry check dated 7/20/23 which was applied for timely though not received within 45 days of hire [See IS CODE SHEET] as required for provisional hiring under the Child Protective Service Law (CPSL).
The child file for Child #2, who is a preschool age child, was observed to contain an updated health report dated 6/5/23 which was conducted more than 12 months from the previously dated 5/24/22 health report on file.
Staff person #1, Staff person #2, and Staff person #4 have not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Revised 10hr Health and Safety Training 2022. Staff person #1, Staff person #2, and Staff person #4 contained the old ten-hour Health and Safety Training and the 1hr updated training were on file which are not acceptable for new staff hired after 10/4/22.
The child file for Child #1 contained a current child service report dated 12/1/23 that was not completed every 6 months from the previous report dated 5/15/23. The child file for Child #2 contained a current child service report dated 12/4/23 that was not completed every 6 months from the previous report dated 5/30/23.
During a swimming inspection, at approximately 10:15am, Staff person #1 and eleven young school aged children were observed. During the onset of supervision and ratio, Staff person #1 identified and named 6 young school aged children thus leaving 5 children unaccounted for. Staff person #2 was observed coming out of the restroom and claimed responsibility for the 5 young school aged children allowing all children to be accounted for. Staff person #2 was observed to not be physically present with their assigned group of children.
During a swimming inspection, at approximately 10:15am, Staff person #1 and eleven young school aged children were observed resulting in the staff:child swim ratio being 1:11. Staff person #2 was observed coming out of the restroom and claimed responsibility for the 5 other young school aged children resuming compliance with staff-child ratios.
At approximately 11:15am, outside in the toddler play space, 3 staff and 29 preschool age children were observed outside playing and a first-aid kit was not present.
At approximately 11:15am, outside in the toddler play space, 3 staff and 29 preschool age children were observed outside playing and the emergency contact forms for all of the children were not present.
The file for Staff person #1 was observed to lack documentation of having applied for and received a State sex offender check and State criminal background check from the State in which they resided in within the previous five years as required by the Child Protective Service Law (CPSL).
*Based on staff interviews it was determined that a young toddler was left alone in the gym for approximately nine minutes with no adult supervision. During this time, staff: child ratio was 0:1.
Based on staff interviews it was determined that a young toddler was left alone in the gym for approximately nine minutes with no adult supervision. During this time, staff: child ratio was 0:1.
Based on staff interviews it was determined that a young toddler was left alone in the gym for approximately nine minutes with no adult supervision.
**Based on staff interviews it was determined that a young toddler was left alone in the gym for approximately nine minutes with no adult supervision.
*Based on staff interviews it was determined that a young toddler was left alone in the gym for approximately nine minutes with no adult supervision.
***Based on staff interviews it was determined that a young toddler was left alone in the gym for approximately nine minutes with no adult supervision.
The staff file for Staff person #4, contained a current health assessment dated 11/1/21 which was conducted more than 24 months from the previously dated 10/28/19 health assessment on file.
The staff file for Staff person #2, was observed to contain a tuberculosis screening test results dated 11/16/20 which was conducted more than 12 months prior to providing initial service in a childcare setting (See IS CODE SHEET).
The staff file for Staff person #3 contained current first-aid/CPR training dated 11/5/22 which was not renewed on or before the expiration of the previous training certificate on file dated 1012/20.
Staff person #4 had not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Health and Safety Training; the health and safety training on file was completed prior to 9/30/16 and is not considered an acceptable training. Staff person #4 now has health and safety training on file dated 11/23/22.
The facility had verification of annual testing on 8-30-21 of the fire detection system by a fire safety professional that lacked the required documentation showing that the deficiencies listed on the report were corrected and the fire detection system was in full compliance with 62 P.S. 1016(c)(3). A new report was submitted on 5-5-22 showing that the fire detection system was re-inspected on 5-3-22 and was in full compliance with 62 P.S. 1016(c)(3). The fire detection system was not in compliance between 8-30-21 to 5-3-22.
At approximately 10:25 a.m., the patio and sidewalk outside the back exit doors from the preschool room were observed to be covered with snow.
In the gym, the first-aid kit was in a cabinet with the lock not functioning and was unlocked resulting in the first-aid kit being accessible to children. The pre-k group was observed in the gym, and the backpack with the first-aid kit inside was on the floor and accessible to children.
In the pre-k room, there was peeling paint in one area on the back right wall near the cots.
In the pre-k room, there was Children's Advil for child #1, and the medication log lacked the name of the medication.
The facility lacked proof of purchase of the interconnected fire detection system in accordance with 62 P.S. 1016(c)(3).
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Enforcement actions
Negative sanctions Pennsylvania lists for this center, such as a downgrade to a provisional certificate, refusing to renew or revoking its certificate of compliance, with the status COMPASS shows. “Operation permitted” means the center may keep operating while it appeals; “operation not permitted” means it may not.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $82.22 | $82.22 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $82.22 | $82.22 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $82.22 | $82.22 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $68.59 | $68.59 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $63.93 | $63.93 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $63.93 | $63.93 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has UPMC Passavant Childrens House had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 14 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jul 9, 2026 (background checks): “The staff file for Staff person #1 was observed to contain a current National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) check dated 7/10/26 which was not obtained prior to first day working with children (See IS CODE SHEET) as…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about UPMC Passavant Childrens House?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at UPMC Passavant Childrens House since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is UPMC Passavant Childrens House’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4 (accredited), effective Sep 30, 2025. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does UPMC Passavant Childrens House compare with other daycares in Pittsburgh?
It is tied for #78 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 68% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was UPMC Passavant Childrens House last inspected?
Jan 21, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does UPMC Passavant Childrens House cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $82.22 for infant, $82.22 for young toddler, $82.22 for older toddler, $68.59 for preschool in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs UPMC Passavant Childrens House?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is UPMC.
Certified centers nearby
8900 Duncan Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.5 mi away · 223 spots Among the most cited YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary
500 Cumberland Rd, Pittsburgh · 0.6 mi away About typical Kiddie Tech
9600 Babcock Blvd, Allison Park · 0.7 mi away · 101 spots About typical Animal Crackers Playhouse LLC
9625 Perry Hwy, Pittsburgh · 1.3 mi away · 38 spots Among the most cited Early Years Child Development Centers
8633 Old Perry Hwy, Pittsburgh · 1.5 mi away · 77 spots More citations than most St Pauls Childcare Preschool and Kidz Korner
1965 Ferguson Rd, Allison Park · 1.5 mi away · 273 spots Among the most cited
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.