YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary
YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary is a certified child care center in Pittsburgh, PA. It holds a Keystone STAR 2 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 9 times. The state cited 38 violations, 11 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for training & qualifications (9 of 38). 10 citations came in the last 12 months, including 4 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #55 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh and has more citations per inspection than 52% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The staff file for Staff person #2 contained a current Child Abuse clearance dated 3/2/26 which was not renewed within 60 months of the previously dated 2/26/21 Child Abuse clearance expiring.
An Auvi-Q epiphren injection for Child #3 was observed to not be in the original container.
The staff file for Staff person #1 lacked a written evaluation every 12 months.
The child file for Child #1 and Child #2 contained a financial agreement and emergency contact information form that were not reviewed and signed by the parent at least once every 6 months; the reviews of the financial agreement and emergency contact information form were last reviewed and signed 8/27/25.
The file for Staff person #2 (See IS Code Sheet), who has resided out of state within the previous five years, was observed to have a Child Abuse and Neglect check from New York dated 3/3/25 and Sex Offender check from New York dated 3/12/25 both of which were obtained seven months after their start date working with children. The staff file for Staff person #3 lacked a valid disclosure statement; the disclosure statement in the file was from prior previous employment with the legal entity.
At approximately 9:35am Staff person #1 was observed coming out of the classroom and towards another empty classroom and approximately 3 seconds later Staff person #2 was observed walking out of the classroom and down the hallway while on the phone. After seeing this certification rep., Staff person #1 alerted Staff person #2 who then turned around and walked back into the classroom. This certification rep entered the classroom and observed Staff person #2 and Staff person #3 with 22 young school age children inside the room. Staff person #1 never returned to the classroom. When Staff person #2 was observed outside the hallway, Staff person #3 was left in the room with 22 young school age children inside the room therefore staff: child ratio was 1:22 young school age children.
At approximately 9:35am Staff person #1 was observed coming out of the classroom and towards another empty classroom and approximately 3 seconds later Staff person #2 was observed walking out of the classroom and down the hallway while on the phone. After seeing this certification rep., Staff person #1 alerted Staff person #2 who then turned around and walked back into the classroom. This certification rep then entered the classroom and observed Staff person #2 and Staff person #3 with 22 young school age children inside the room. During the onset of supervision and ratio, when staff were asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for, Staff person #3 identified and named 12 young school age children, Staff person #2 identified and named 10 young school age children. Staff person #1 never returned to the classroom. When asked, Staff person #2 admitted that they were still the one responsible for their assigned group of children when Staff person #2 stepped out of the classroom on the phone. Therefore, it was determined that Staff person #2 was not physically present with their assigned group of children.
The annual emergency drill documentation for 2024, which has been previously viewed by the certification representative was observed to not be in the file at the of inspection. Therefore, it cannot be determined if this year's annual emergency drill dated 8/21/25 was done timely.
The staff file for Staff person #1 was observed to contain fire safety trainings that were conducted more than 12 months apart; those fire safety trainings are dated 8/31/24 and 9/5/25.
The child file for Child #1 contained a current financial agreement and emergency contact form that were not reviewed and signed by the parent every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the financial agreement and the emergency contact form were dated 9/11/25 and 2/11/25. The child file for Child #2 contained a current financial agreement and emergency contact form that were not reviewed and signed by the parent every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the financial agreement were dated 9/6/25 and 2/18/25 and the emergency contact form dated 9/11/25 and 2/18/25.
Show 28 older citations
At approximately 9:30am Staff person #1 was observed walking down the hallway, away from the classroom, and Staff person #2 was observed in the hallway at that same time assisting one child at their locker. After seeing this certification rep., Staff person #1 turned around to walk back towards the classroom. Staff person #1 and this certification rep entered the classroom together and observed Staff person #3 with 21 young school age children inside the room therefore staff: child ratio was 1:21 young school age children.
At approximately 9:30am Staff person #1 and this certification rep entered the classroom together and observed Staff person #3 with 21 young school age inside the room. Staff person #2, and the child they were assisting out in the hallway, also returned to the room shortly thereafter. During the onset of supervision and ratio, when staff were asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for, Staff person #3 identified and named 11 young school age children, Staff person #2 identified and named 11 young school age children, and Staff person #1 did not claim a supervisory group. Therefore, it was determined that Staff person #2 was not physically present with all of the children in their assigned group during the time Staff person #2 was in the hallway assisting another child at their locker.
Child #1 lacked signed parental consent for administration of an Auvi-Q EpiPen.
Upon arrival at the facility, and throughout the duration of the unannounced inspection, none of the staff present at the facility were able to produce or obtain the fire drill log.
During an incident investigation conducted on 3/28/25 it was determined that on 3/4/25 Child #1 received a laceration while outside on the playground, was taken to the emergency room for treatment, and the facility did not notify the western region office of the incident within 24 hours.
The staff file for Staff person #5 was observed to not have a completed National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) on file until 10/3/24 (SEE IS CODE SHEET). The staff file for Staff person #6 was observed to not have a completed National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) on file until 10/1/24 (SEE IS CODE SHEET).
In the Cafeteria, one trash receptacle specifically used by the school age program to discard trash that has been contaminated by human secretions was observed to not have a lid.
The staff file for Staff person #3 lacked emergency plan training within 90 days of hire.
The child file for Child #1 through Child #4, who have been in attendance for more than 60 days, was observed to lack an initial health report.
Staff person #1 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric First Aid/CPR and Health and Safety Training. Staff person #1 has since completed pediatric first aid/CPR training on 11/30/23 and Health and Safety training on 8/24/24. Staff person #4 has not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric First Aid/CPR. Staff person #4 has completed the training on 11/30/23.
The staff file for Staff person #1 contained current staff evaluation dated 8/15/24 which was not completed at least one every 12 months from the previous staff evaluation on file dated 5/18/23. The staff file for Staff person #2 contained current staff evaluation dated 6/14/24 which was not completed at least one every 12 months from the previous staff evaluation on file dated 5/24/23.
The staff file for Staff person #6, who is functioning as an Aide, lacked proof of a high school diploma.
The child file for Child #1 was observed to contain a current financial agreement form that lacked the departure time.
In the cafeteria, at approximately 7:45am, 1 staff and 13 young school age children were observed. During the assessment of supervision and ratio Staff person #1 identified and named responsibility for 13 young school age children resulting in the staff:child ratio being 1:13.
In the cafeteria, at approximately 7:45am, 1 staff and 13 young school age children were observed. During the assessment of supervision and ratio Staff person #1 identified and named responsibility for 13 young school age children. Staff person #2 and Staff person #3 were observed returning to the cafeteria and were asked to identify and name the children whom they were responsible for. Staff person #2 identified and named responsibility for 5 young school age children, Staff person #3 was not responsible for any children, and Staff person #1 identified and named responsibility for 7 children thus leaving 1 unaccounted for. When staff were asked again to identify and name the children they were responsible the same 1 child was unaccounted for. On the third attempt all children were identified and accounted for.
The staff file for Staff person #1 contained current staff evaluation dated 5/15/23 which was not completed at least one every 12 months from the previous staff evaluation on file dated 4/21/22.
The child file for Child #1 contained an initial health report dated 11/11/22 that lacked the physician's signature.
The file for staff person #2 was observed not to contain documentation of application for a National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR) prior to date of hire (See IS CODE SHEET) required under the Child Protective Service Law (CPSL).
The staff file for Staff person #2 lacked emergency plan training at time of hire (See IS CODE SHEET); Staff person #2 received emergency plan training on 8/22/22.
The child file for Child #2, and Child #4 [See IS CODE SHEET] lacked a copy of their immunization record.
The child file for Child #2, Child #3, and Child #4 [See IS CODE SHEET] lacked an initial health report.
The staff file for Staff person #2, who was hired on 4/30/22 as an aide and has a date of birth of 9/2/2004, was not 18 years of age at time of hire.
The staff file for Staff person #3 contained current first-aid/CPR training dated 10/13/22 which was not renewed on or before the expiration of the previous training certificate on file dated 8/26/20.
Staff person #4 and Staff person #5 had not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric First Aid/CPR; Staff person #4 and Staff person #5 did not obtain Pediatric First Aid/CPR by 6/17/21 as required for all staff hired prior to 12/19/20.
The child file for Child #1 contained a financial agreement and an emergency contact information form that were not reviewed and updated by the parent at least once in a 6-month period; the dates of the most recent updates were 3/9/22 for the financial agreement and 3/21/22 for the emergency contact information form. The child file for Child #2 contained a financial agreement and an emergency contact information form that were not reviewed and updated by the parent with in a 6-month period; the dates of the most two most recent reviews for the financial agreement and the emergency contact information form were 3/23/22 and 10/4/22. The child file for Child #3 contained a financial agreement and an emergency contact information form that were not reviewed and updated by the parent at least once in a 6-month period; the dates of the most recent updates were for the financial agreement and the emergency contact information form was 2/22/22. The child file for Child #4 contained a financial agreement and an emergency contact information form that were not reviewed and updated by the parent with in a 6-month period; the dates of the most two most recent reviews for the financial…
The file for staff person #1, with a start date of 10-25-21, had an FBI clearance dated 5-18-18 that indicated a record and lacked the corresponding rap sheet.
The files for child #1 and #2 had an agreement that lacked the child's admission date.
The file for child #2 had an emergency contact form that lacked the health insurance policy number.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $49.80 | $36.20 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $49.80 | $36.20 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 11 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on May 11, 2026 (background checks): “The staff file for Staff person #2 contained a current Child Abuse clearance dated 3/2/26 which was not renewed within 60 months of the previously dated 2/26/21 Child Abuse clearance expiring.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary?
Pennsylvania lists no complaint investigation that found a violation at YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary since 2021. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 2, effective Jun 18, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary compare with other daycares in Pittsburgh?
It is tied for #55 of 251 centers in Pittsburgh by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 52% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary last inspected?
May 11, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $49.80 for young school-age, $49.80 for older school-age in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs YMCA of Greater PGH/McKnight Elementary?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh.
Certified centers nearby
9100 Babcock Blvd, Pittsburgh · 0.6 mi away · 128 spots More citations than most Animal Crackers Playhouse LLC
9625 Perry Hwy, Pittsburgh · 0.9 mi away · 38 spots Among the most cited Doodle Bugs Childrens Centers
8900 Duncan Ave, Pittsburgh · 0.9 mi away · 223 spots Among the most cited Early Years Child Development Centers
8633 Old Perry Hwy, Pittsburgh · 0.9 mi away · 77 spots More citations than most Tender Care Learning Center/McCandless
8413 Perry Hwy, Pittsburgh · 1.1 mi away · 78 spots More citations than most Kiddie Tech
9600 Babcock Blvd, Allison Park · 1.3 mi away · 101 spots About typical
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.