Little Rascals Early Learning Center
Little Rascals Early Learning Center is a certified child care center in Washington, PA, with capacity for 150 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 10 times and confirmed violations in 3 complaint investigations. The state cited 64 violations, 8 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for building & playground safety (28 of 64). 15 citations came in the last 12 months, including 4 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #3 of 10 centers in Washington and has more citations per inspection than 71% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
Based on investigative findings, on 7/02/26, staff #1 grabbed child #1 by the back of the shirt and ponytail and pushed child #1 out of the room, down the hall, and into the office. In the office, staff #1 pushed child #1 down into a chair.
Based on witness statements, on 7/02/26 in the school aged room, staff #1 singled child #1 out for ridicule while repeatedly shouting that child #1 was crying like a baby, acting like a big baby, and that child #1 should go get her baby doll.
Based on witness statements, on 7/02/26 in the school aged room, staff #1 used harsh and demeaning language while repeatedly shouting that child #1 was crying like a baby, acting like a big baby, and that child #1 should go get her baby doll.
The file for staff #3 contained a disclosure statement which was not signed by a witness. The file for staff #5 contained an invalid state police clearance which lacked the dissemination date. The clearance was requested 9/16/25.
At approximately 11:00AM, Room 2 was observed to be over capacity. A mix of 20 preschool and school age children were present but not participating in a program activity. Room 2 has a measured capacity of 14.
The following cleaning materials were accessible to children; 2 containers of disinfecting spray, 4 packages of disinfecting wipes and 1 container of odor eliminator in an unlocked grey cabinet in room 7. Floor cleaner and deodorizer in an unlocked sink cabinet in room 8.
An unlabeled spray bottle containing cleaning materials was observed in room 8.
A sink in the rear stall of the PS restroom was not fully secured to the wall. Multiple protruding trim nails were observed on the cubbies in room 8. The wooden end caps of the separating walls of the cubbies were no longer in place leaving the nail heads exposed. In the preschool restroom, crumbling rust debris was observed on the bottom of the stall walls between 3 stalls.
Damaged plaster and plaster debris was accessible to children along the baseboard under the windows in Room 7.
Two toilets in the restroom in the toddler hall lacked posted handwashing signs. In the Preschool restroom, a sink in the end stall, designated for staff, lacked a hand-washing sign.
Torn areas which exposed the inner foam filling were observed on the back support pillow on an adult rocking chair in the infant room. A toy garage with a disconnected roof top which created a pinch point was observed in room 8. One cracked toy bin was observed in room 8. A split seam which exposed the inner foam padding was observed on a nap mat in use by a child in room 6. A cracked seat was observed on the ride-on Merry-Go-Round equipment in the outdoor play space.
Small art pom-poms, with a diameter of less than 1 inch, were accessible to children in a plastic storage tower in Room 3. Older toddlers were present in the room.
The file for staff #1, designated on the staff data sheet as the director, did not include documentation of the qualifications required for the position. The degree on file lacked the course of study and transcripts were in the file. The file for staff #4, designated as an aide, did not include documentation of the qualifications required for the position.
The written evaluation for staff #2 dated 12/01/25 was not conducted by the director.
The emergency contact information for children #1 and #2 did not include complete addresses for each individual designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
Show 49 older citations
The emergency contact form of child #1 did not consent from the child's parent for emergency medical care.
The emergency contact form of child #1 did not contain signed consent from the child's parent for administration of minor first-aid procedures by facility staff.
The emergency contact form of child #1, who is picked up at their school bus stop, did not contain signed consent from the child's parent for transportation and walking excursions by facility staff.
The files for children #1 and #2 lacked agreements.
A Swiffer power mop, with the cleaning solution bottle attached, was accessible to children in the older toddler restroom. The mop was observed leaning against the wall in the corner. Children were observed entering and exiting the restroom.
The handle on one restroom door stall was unattached leaving a protruding screw exposed. The restroom is located in the hall to the left of the entrance.
Standing discolored water was observed in the sink in room 4. The sink was clogged at the time of the observation.
A loose hinge creating a pinch point was observed on the play stove in room 3. A broken plastic bin containing "Critter Blocks" was observed in room 3.
In room 1, child #3 was observed napping on a cot labeled for child #4.
The following medication containers were not labeled for a specific child; Diazepam and Tylenol in room 4 and ibuprofen in room 5.
The file for staff #1 contained documentation of consecutive fire safety trainings completed more than 12 months apart; 8/28/23 and 10/14/24.
Staff #2 did not renew mandated reporter training within 60 months. This is evidenced by the previous training certificate being dated 2/07/19 and the most recent training certificate being dated 3/24/24.
The emergency contact form for child #2 did not include the complete address of the child's physician.
The emergency contact form for child #1 did not include the complete work address and phone number for the enrolling parent.
A broken electrical outlet wall plate with sharp edges was observed.
A portion of torn foam was observed on the floor supports of an infant rocker.
Self contained Generators with spotlights were accessible to the children during the complaint investigation due to mesh fence being down.
Young toddlers were observed playing on the gravel area of the outdoor play area, leaving pieces of gravel and stone that are less than 1" accessible to those young toddlers.
While being interviewed numerous staff members told Certification Representative that the water they use when outside for the children is in a sports squirt like bottle. When a child says they are thirsty, they have a child open their mouth and they squirt water into the child's mouth.
The letter for parents explaining the emergency procedures did not include details regarding the accommodations made for infants and toddlers.
A mirror mounted on the wall of the OT room was not securely attached to the frame creating a pinch point. An empty wall-mounted bracket, intended to hold a fire extinguisher, was observed in room 2. The fire extinguisher was not in place leaving the two prongs of the bracket protruding at head level of the children observed in care.
Rest mats with split seams resulting in exposed foam were observed. One mat was observed in the infant room, three were observed in the older toddler room.
Areas of damage were observed on the following pieces of equipment; broken areas on the steps of a plastic outdoor climbing toy, broken plastic on the corners of two storage tubs in the outdoor space, a broken seat on a children's pedal operated merry-go-round, and a broken magnetic closure on the play kitchen in room 2. A wooden table with a loose leg which created a pinch point was observed in the YT room.
Consecutive annual test reports for the facility's fire alarm system were dated more than 12 months apart. The reports were dated 12/10/22 and 1/04/24. A current test report is now on file.
Two 5 gallon buckets containing water were observed in child care space. Both buckets were approximately half full and were observed in room 7 (preschool age) and outside room 1 (young toddlers) within the route the children would use when leaving their room.
The file for staff #2, designated as an AGS on the staff data sheet, did not contain documentation of verified experience with children.
The files for staff #1 and #3 contained consecutive evaluations dated more than 12 months apart. Current evaluations are now on file.
At 10:45 am, staff #1 was observed caring for 11 preschool age children alone in room 7.
The file for staff #1 contained an expired child abuse clearance dated 1/17/18. Proof of applying for the clearance on 1/17/23 was on file, however the completed clearance was not.
The facility's emergency plan did not include details regarding continuity of operations as required in Announcement C-22-04.
Protruding nails were observed on the wooden cubbies in room 8 and room 2 and on the floor near the cubbies in room 3.
The following broken equipment was observed; a plastic orange construction cone in room 7, plastic hub caps of a pink scooter in the blacktop area outside, corners of the lid and tub of two sand/water tables outside. The broken areas created sharp edges and pinch points. A loose table leg, which created a pinch point, was observed on a wooden table in the dramatic play area in room 3.
Tears which exposed the inner foam filling were observed on 2 nap mats in room 1 and on 1 nap mat in the hall outside room 7.
The file for child #1 contained an immunization record which stated the parent refused the influenza vaccine, however a written exemption was not on file.
Three bottles in the infant room were not labeled with the child's name.
Room 7 and room 8 lacked posted written schedules of daily activities.
The files for children #2 and #3 contained emergency contact information which did not include the address of one of the individuals designated by the parent to whom the child may be released.
The emergency contact information for child #5 was not present in the room where the child was observed in care.
The files for children #3 and #4 contained emergency contact forms and agreements which were not updated at least once within a 6 month period. The documents for child #3 were updated on 4/12/21 and again on 12/14/22. The documents for child #4 were updated on 5/16/22 and again on 12/28/22. The documents on file for both children are now current.
According to staff statements, a staff #1, attempt to redirect preschool aged child #1, by grabbing his face to force him to look at her and by telling him to "knock it off" referring to his behavior at that time.
According to staff statements, a staff #1, attempt to redirect preschool aged child #1, by grabbing his face to force him to look at her and by telling him to "knock it off" referring to his behavior at that time.
The closet at the back of the pre-k room contained toxic items that were accessible to children. The closet door was not closed. The lock/latch on the door was unable to hold the door closed. The following toxic items were observed in the closet: Goo Gone cleaner, Sunscreen and staff medication.
In the pre-k counts room the first aid kit lacked, tweezers, gloves and bandages.
There was a broken ceilling tile in the corner of the infant room.
There was a broken bin in the pre-k room, a broken bin in the play kitchen sink in the preschool room, two broken baskets and a baby accessory toy in the school age room.
There was a cracked plastic laundry bin in the infant room.
The file for child #6 lacked the child's arrival and departure times on the agreement form.
The files for child #1,2,3,4 and 5 lacked the address and phone number of the enrolling parent.
The file for child #1 lacked the address and phone number of the release person on the emergency contact form.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $60.00 | $40.00 |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $60.00 | $40.00 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $55.00 | $35.00 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $55.00 | $35.00 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $50.00 | $30.00 |
| Young School-Age (K-3rd gr.) | $45.00 | $25.00 |
| Older School-Age (4th gr.-15 yrs.) | $45.00 | $25.00 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has Little Rascals Early Learning Center had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 8 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jul 9, 2026 (caregiver conduct): “Based on investigative findings, on 7/02/26, staff #1 grabbed child #1 by the back of the shirt and ponytail and pushed child #1 out of the room, down the hall, and into the office. In the office, staff #1 pushed child…” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about Little Rascals Early Learning Center?
Pennsylvania lists 3 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is Little Rascals Early Learning Center’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4, effective Jan 23, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does Little Rascals Early Learning Center compare with other daycares in Washington?
It is tied for #3 of 10 centers in Washington by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 71% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was Little Rascals Early Learning Center last inspected?
Jul 9, 2026 (unannounced monitoring). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does Little Rascals Early Learning Center cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $60.00 for newborn, $60.00 for infant, $55.00 for young toddler, $55.00 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs Little Rascals Early Learning Center?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Little Rascals Early Learning Center LLC.
Certified centers nearby
925 Henderson Ave, Washington · 0.8 mi away · 96 spots Fewer citations than most Gwens Day Care
860 Allison Ave, Washington · 1.4 mi away · 107 spots Among the most cited Rainbows End Learning Center INC
655 Jefferson Ave, Washington · 1.6 mi away · 93 spots Among the most cited KinderCare Learning Center/Washington
63 Wilson Ave, Washington · 1.9 mi away · 99 spots Among the most cited Smartkids Child Care and Learning Center
161 W Beau St, Washington · 2.3 mi away · 104 spots Among the most cited Your Childs Place
289 North Ave, Washington · 2.6 mi away · 53 spots More citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.