The Goddard School · Wexford
The Goddard School is a certified child care center in Wexford, PA, with capacity for 135 children. It holds a Keystone STAR 4 (accredited) rating. Since August 2021, Pennsylvania certification staff have inspected it 7 times and confirmed violations in 4 complaint investigations. The state cited 68 violations, 31 of them core-safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep), most often for supervision (18 of 68). 7 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 on a core-safety topic. Measured by topic-weighted citations per inspection, it is #7 of 8 centers in Wexford and has more citations per inspection than 95% of Pennsylvania certified centers.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
The staff file for Staff person #2 contained a disclosure statement on file that was not signed by a witness.
In the PreK A Room a clear plastic lid with green handles was observed to have multiple cracks on the lid causing it not to be in good repair. A clear plastic bin was observed to have a broken handle with a crack on the side causing it not to be in good repair.
The child file for Child #2, who is a preschool age child, was observed to contain an updated health report dated 8/13/25 which was conducted more than 12 months from the previously dated 7/31/24 health report on file. The child file for Child #7, who is a preschool age child, was observed to contain an updated health report dated 10/29/25 which was conducted more than 12 months from the previously dated 9/7/24 health report on file.
The staff file for Staff person #1 contained a current health assessment dated 10/14/24 that had 'Yes' checked off to having a communicable disease and additional information describing the condition and the risk it might pose was not provided.
The staff file for Staff person #1 contained current staff evaluation dated 11/4/25 which was not completed at least once every 12 months from the previous staff evaluation on file dated 10/14/24.
The child file for Child #1, Child #2, Child #4, Child #5, Child #6, Child #7, and Child #8 was observed to have a current financial agreement form on file that lacked the child's admission date.
The child file for Child #3 contained a current financial agreement and emergency contact form that were not reviewed and signed by the parent every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the financial agreement and emergency contact form were reviewed and signed on 5/4/26 and 10/31/25. The child file for Child #9 contained a current financial agreement and emergency contact form that were not reviewed and signed by the parent every 6 months; the two most recent reviews of the financial agreement and emergency contact form were reviewed and signed on 5/3/26 and 10/31/25.
The file for Staff person #1 was observed not to contain a valid State Police clearance within 45 days of hire (See IS CODE SHEET). The file for Staff person #2 was observed to lack a complete State Police clearance.
The staff file for Staff person #4 contained a current health assessment and tuberculosis screening/results dated 10/2/24 which was not conducted prior to providing initial service in a childcare setting.
The staff file for Staff person #3 contained a current health assessment dated 5/13/25 that was observed to lack an examination for communicable diseases and the results of that examination.
Show 58 older citations
The child file for Child #1 was observed to have a current emergency contact information form that lacked the health insurance policy number.
The file for Staff person #5 was observed to lack documentation of having applied for and received a state sex offender check from the States in which they resided in within the previous five years as required by the Child Protective Service Law (CPSL). The file for Staff person #6 was observed to lack documentation of having applied for and received a state sex offender check and State child abuse and neglect check from the States in which they resided in within the previous five years as required by the Child Protective Service Law (CPSL).
At approximately 1:30pm, during naptime in the Twos Room, Staff person #11 was observed sitting at a child's table and how they were positioned, they could not adequately supervise one of the napping children who was next to the table due to the table and chairs obstructing Staff person #11's ability to see and assess that child.
The letter to the parents explaining the emergency procedures does not mention annual emergency drills, lockdown, or accommodations for infants/toddlers and children with disabilities or chronic medical conditions.
At approximately 10:15am, in the Infant Room, two infants were observed to be asleep in separate cribs; one crib did not have at least 2 feet of space on three sides of that crib and the other crib, which was placed up against a corner wall, did not have 2 feet of space on two sides of that crib while it was in use.
The staff file for Staff person #8, contained a current health assessment dated 4/6/24 which was conducted more than 24 months from the previously dated 3/2/22 health assessment on file. The staff file for Staff person #9, contained a current health assessment dated 11/27/23 that lacked the name of Staff person #9 on the form therefore making it invalid.
Upon review of the facility's 30-day fire testing documentation, the following tests were observed to have been conducted more than 30 days apart: 8/28/23 - 9/28/23 (31 days) and 3/15/24 - 4/15/24 (31 days).
The facility's notice of issuance of a provisional certificate of compliance and all attachments were not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents as evidence by those documents were being covered over by a CPCS recall sign.
Staff person #3, Staff person #4, Staff person #7, Staff person #10 and Staff person #11 have not completed the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Health and Safety Training Revised 10-hour training.
Staff person 6 has acceptable pediatric first aid/CPR training in an approved curriculum; however, the trainer has not provided documentation that they are PQAS-certified in that training topic.
The staff file for Staff person #3 who is functioning as Director, lacked documentation of 1 year of experience working with children.
The child file for Child #1 was observed to have a current financial agreement form that lacked the admission date.
The facility's current provisional certificate of compliance was not posted in a conspicuous location used by parents as evidence by it was being covered over by a CPCS recall sign.
Child #1 was found alone in a classroom with no staff person present with the child, making the room out of ratio.
Staff person #1 and #2 were supervising the PreK A classroom but neither staff person saw Child #1 leave the classroom prior to her being found alone in the Preschool classroom.
** Staff person #1 and #2 were responsible for Child #1 while in the PreK A classroom and neither staff person was aware that Child #1 left the classroom unsupervised.
*** Staff person #1 and #2 were responsible for Child #1 while in the PreK A classroom and neither staff person was aware that Child #1 left the classroom unsupervised.
* Staff person #1 and #2 were responsible for Child #1 while in the PreK A classroom and neither staff person was aware that Child #1 left the classroom unsupervised.
At approximately 11:00 am, on 9.27.23, Staff #1 and Staff #2, took all of the children from the Two's Room, outside to the play space, and left Child #1 behind in the classroom, unsupervised, for approximately 20 minutes. Therefore, ratio was 0:1.
*** At approximately 11:00 am, on 9.27.23, Staff #1 and Staff #2, took all of the children from the Two's Room, outside to the play space, and left Child #1 behind in the classroom, unsupervised, for approximately 20 minutes.
** At approximately 11:00 am, on 9.27.23, Staff #1 and Staff #2, took all of the children from the Two's Room, outside to the play space, and left Child #1 behind in the classroom, unsupervised, for approximately 20 minutes.
At approximately 11:00 am, on 9.27.23, Staff #1 and Staff #2, took all of the children from the Two's Room, outside to the play space, and left Child #1 behind in the classroom, unsupervised, for approximately 20 minutes.
At approximately 11:00 am, on 9.27.23, Staff #1 and Staff #2, took all of the children from the Two's Room, outside to the play space, and left Child #1 behind in the classroom, unsupervised, for approximately 20 minutes. Therefore, no staff were physically present with the child in the child care space.
The file for Staff person #1 includes an FBI clearance obtained through the PA Department of Education, not DHS, making it invalid (See LIS Code Sheet). The file for Staff person #6 was observed to include a child abuse clearance which was obtained for volunteer purposes and is invalid (See LIS Code Sheet).
The two most recent health assessments on file for Child #1, who is a preschool age child, are dated 1/4/22 and 3/17/23, more than 1 year apart. The two most recent health assessments on file for Child #3, who is a preschool age child, are dated 3/28/22 and 5/2/23, more than 1 year apart.
The immunization record on file for Child #2, who is 21 months old, includes 1 of 3 Hepatitis B vaccines recommended by the ACIP for a child this age; no influenza vaccines, recommended annually by the ACIP for a child this age; 0 of 1 MMR vaccines recommended for a child this age; and 0 of 1 Varicella vaccines recommended for a child this age.
The fire alarm 30-day test log includes test dates1/18/23-2/20/23; 3/20/23-4/20/23, and 7/3/23-8/3/23, more than 60 days apart.
The file for Staff person #4, #7, #8, #9, #10, classified as Assistant Group Supervisors, do not include a high school diploma or a general educational development certificate and 30 credits in education or a related human services field; or i high school diploma or a general educational development certificate and 15 credits in education or a related human services field and 1 year of verified child care experience; or a high school diploma or a general educational development certificate with 2 years of verified child care experience.
The file for Staff person #4 and #5 includes only 1 written nonfamily reference.
The file for Staff person #2 includes 9 of 12 required annual training hours completed between 8/9/22-8/9/23, as per Announcement C-21-09. The file for Staff person #3 includes 2 of 12 required annual training hours completed between 12/19/21-12/19/22, with an additional 10 hours of training after 12/19/22 to be counted toward the requirement, as per Announcement C-21-09.
Based on staff interviews it was determined that on several occasions prior to 8.17.23 staff have been out of ratio, typically during drop-off, while they wait an additional staff person to arrive in the classroom.
Based on interviews it was determined that Staff person #1 was observed dragging Child #1, who was sitting on the floor on a foam mat, off the mat and across the tile floor approximately, 10 feet, in a sitting position.
While conducting a complaint investigation on 8/17/23 the Certification representative observed the Infant room out of ratio: Staff person #1 and Staff person #2 were in the room with 1 young toddler and 8 infants for a period of 2 minutes.
Staff person #1 and #2 did not know that Child #1 exited the classroom and was gone for a period of 3 minutes, therefore no staff person was present to maintain ratio requirements.
**** Staff person #1 and #2 left Child #1 unsupervised for approximately 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and exited the facility and stood on the sidewalk outside, until he was discovered by another parent.
*** Staff person #1 and #2 left Child #1 unsupervised for approximately 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and exited the facility and stood on the sidewalk outside, until he was discovered by another parent.
****** Staff person #1 and #2 left Child #1 unsupervised for approximately 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and exited the facility and stood on the sidewalk outside, until he was discovered by another parent.
******* Staff person #1 and #2 left Child #1 unsupervised for approximately 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and exited the facility and stood on the sidewalk outside, until he was discovered by another parent.
* Staff person #1 and #2 left Child #1 unsupervised for approximately 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and exited the facility and stood on the sidewalk outside, until he was discovered by another parent.
** Staff person #1 and #2 left Child #1 unsupervised for approximately 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and exited the facility and stood on the sidewalk outside, until he was discovered by another parent.
Child #1, a preschool child, was alone and unsupervised for a period of 3 minutes when he exited the classroom unseen and walked down the hall and exited the building. Staff person #1 and #2 were unaware of the whereabouts of Child #1 during this time. There was no staff person present with the child to fulfill the staff to child ratio requirement during this time.
The file for Staff #1, employed for more than 45 days, contained a State Police request, and therefore, was incorrectly provisionally hired. The file for Staff #2 lacked requests for out of state clearances prior to working with children. Therefore, she was incorrectly provisionally hired.
At approximately 10:30 AM in Room 10 there were 17 preschool aged children. Staff #1 named 10 of the children as being in her assigned group. Staff #3 named 6 of the children as being in her assigned group but was unable to name the 7th child. Staff #3 stated that she did not know all the names of the children in her "assigned" group.
Multiple staff have reported being out of ratio at various times.
The signed Disclosure statement on file for Staff person #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, and #12 is not dated, making it invalid.
There was a missing outlet cover in the Mailcarriers room, in the back of the room.
There were missing toilet bolt covers in the bathroom on the Bakers classroom and on the handicapped toilet in the bathroom in the Mailcarriers room.
There were areas of peeling paint on the following areas: in the Bakers room under the 3rd window on the right and in the art area; in the Librarians Room, on the Gallery wall and under the smart board.
There were pompoms and sequins in the Older Toddler 1 room (Barbers), used for arts and crafts projects, that were smaller than 1 inch.
The most recent influenza vaccination on file for Child #1, who is 4 years old, is dated 10/12/20, more than 1 year ago, as is recommended annually by the ACIP.
The two most recent health assessments on file for Staff person #2 were dated 5/15/20 and 5/25/22, more than 24 months apart. The two most recent health assessments on file for Staff person #9 were dated 8/11/20 and 8/23/22, more than 24 months apart.
The safety drop-off and pick-up procedures were not posted in a conspicuous location in the child care facility.
The facility does not have proof of purchase for the interconnected fire detection system.
The fire drill log on file at the facility includes fire drills held on 1/10/22-2/11/22; 2/11/22-3/18/22; 3/18/22-4/22/22; 5/12/22-6/30/22, all more than 60 days apart.
Staff person #11 and #12 did not complete the following required pre-service training within 90 days of their date of hire (see LIS code sheet): Pediatric First Aid/CPR. Staff person #11 completed the training on 8/13/22 and Staff person #12 completed the training on 8/11/22
The facility did not have verification of providing the parent of each child enrolled with information on how to access the regulations in this chapter electronically.
The file for Staff person #9 and #11, did not include verification of having completed 12 hours of annual training between 12/19/20-12/19/21 (See LIS CODE SHEET).
Staff person #1 turned her back to Child #1, an infant, who was sitting on the floor, when the child apparently fell, hitting her head and suffering a significant head injury.
“Core safety” marks citations about supervision and staff ratios, discipline and caregiver conduct, background checks, child protection and safe sleep, the topics our score weights most. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity. “Follow-up” marks a violation re-cited at a follow-up visit, counted once. How scores work.
Complaint investigations and reported incidents
Pennsylvania’s search lists complaint investigations in which the state found at least one violation (“verified complaints”). It does not say what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it. Incident investigations look into something that happened at the center; self-reported violations are ones the center reported to the state itself.
Daily rates
| Age group | Full time, per day | Part time, per day |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn (Under 6 Weeks) | $114.55 | $85.91 |
| Infant (6 Weeks-12 mos.) | $114.55 | $85.91 |
| Young Toddler (13-24 mos.) | $105.27 | $82.40 |
| Older Toddler (25-36 mos.) | $105.22 | $78.89 |
| Preschool (37 mos.- Entering K) | $84.85 | $63.65 |
The daily price the center lists in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search for families paying privately. The state notes that rates are subject to change and programs don’t have to share them, so confirm with the center. See what daycare costs in Pennsylvania.
About this center
Common questions
Has The Goddard School had any serious violations?
Pennsylvania cited 31 violations since 2021 on the topics Daycare Record treats as core safety (supervision, staff ratios, discipline, background checks, child protection or safe sleep). The most recent, on Jun 3, 2026 (background checks): “The staff file for Staff person #2 contained a disclosure statement on file that was not signed by a witness.” Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; each citation is listed in full above.
Have there been complaints about The Goddard School?
Pennsylvania lists 4 complaint investigations since 2021 in which it found at least one violation; the violations are listed above. Its search shows these “verified complaints” but not what a complaint alleged, or whether every violation relates to it.
What is The Goddard School’s Keystone STARS rating?
STAR 4 (accredited), effective May 31, 2026. Keystone STARS is Pennsylvania’s quality rating program for child care, from STAR 1 to STAR 4. It measures program quality, not inspection results, so read both.
How does The Goddard School compare with other daycares in Wexford?
It is #7 of 8 centers in Wexford by topic-weighted citations per inspection, and has more citations per inspection than 95% of Pennsylvania certified centers with enough inspection history to compare.
When was The Goddard School last inspected?
Jun 3, 2026 (renewal). The state cited at least one violation during that visit.
How much does The Goddard School cost?
It reported full-time daily rates of $114.55 for newborn, $114.55 for infant, $105.27 for young toddler, $105.22 for older toddler in Pennsylvania’s COMPASS search. Rates can change; confirm with the center.
Who runs The Goddard School?
The legal entity on its Pennsylvania certificate is Kaz Boylston LLC.
Certified centers nearby
10 N Meadows Dr, Wexford · 0.3 mi away · 85 spots More citations than most Wexford Community Presby Church Childrens CTR
10645 Perry Hwy, Wexford · 0.3 mi away · 65 spots About typical Stepping Stones Childrens CTR/Wexford Elementary
250 Brown Rd, Wexford · 0.8 mi away About typical Kiddie Academy of Wexford
140 Swinderman Rd, Wexford · 1.7 mi away · 198 spots Among the most cited KinderCare Learning Center/Wexford
106 Vip Dr, Wexford · 1.8 mi away Among the most cited Solid Foundations Academy LLC
12980 Perry Hwy, Wexford · 1.9 mi away · 101 spots More citations than most
Citations are quoted from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services inspection records (Office of Child Development and Early Learning, Bureau of Certification Services), including each finding and the center’s plan of correction. Rule numbers refer mostly to 55 Pa. Code Chapter 3270, the rules for child care centers; a few cite Chapter 20, which covers every certified facility. Pennsylvania’s records don’t grade violations by severity; the “core safety” label and the score are Daycare Record’s.
To check the state’s own record, search the center’s name on COMPASS Child Care Provider Search and open its inspection history. Data refreshed Oct 16, 2026.
Comparing centers? See how to choose a daycare: 30 questions to ask and a printable checklist.
Concerned about this center? See how to report a daycare: which state line to call, what to write down and what happens next.